MPs’ shocking behaviour is par for the course in Cameron’s government
Feeling a bit peaky, David? But the revelations about your Tory friends and Liberal Democrat partners should hardly come as a surprise!
It must have been very difficult for David Cameron, returning from his spectacularly ill-timed holiday in the sun to find that his colleagues had been having a much better time than he has – at home.
It seems that he returned to “crisis talks” at Downing Street, where aides told him of a “sensational love affair” which has potentially significant political implications for him. Apologies for the hyperbolic language involved, but this information comes from the Daily Mail.
The newspaper said it could not disclose the identities of the people involved in these shenanigans, or any details of the relationship, for legal reasons, so the speculation machine has probably gone into overdrive and by the time this reaches your screen, The Sun has probably already disclosed the names of the co-respondents.
For those of us who aren’t that clued-up, it’s great fun to speculate. The paper said they are middle-aged figures, the affair has now concluded, and it does not involve anyone serving in the Cabinet.
Who could it be? Longtime readers of this blog will know that Vox Political has long harboured hopes of a Michael Gove legover crisis – or indeed a Michael leGOVEr crisis (see what we did there?) – but in all honesty this seems unlikely until medical evidence can prove that he is compatible with a human female.
So who, then? Nadine Dorries and Nigel Farage? Peter Bone and a human being? Doubtful. Boris and… Boris and-
Hmm.
It’s probably best not to pursue that line of inquiry. Far more interesting to sit back and wait for the ‘poshed-up’ version of the Jeremy Kyle show, in which all will be revealed.
With the curtains closed, of course – not as the badge of a serial skiver, but simply to avoid the shame of having to admit watching an episode of Kyle.
The worse news is, this wasn’t the only story breaking about government misdeeds. It seems that Cameron’s Liberal Democrat Coalition partners have been playing “pork barrel” politics (yes, it’s the Daily Mail again) by diverting taxpayers’ money into key Liberal Democrat-held constituencies.
We now know that a £2 billion scheme to refurbish roads, pavements and bridges in Nick Clegg’s Sheffield Hallam constituency has been reversed, in a deal with private business that took the project off the government balance sheet. A private finance initiative? We all know that PFI projects don’t turn out well for anyone involved other than the companies, so Clegg may have given himself a shot in the foot, rather than a shot in the arm.
The Mail also reports dodgy dealings by Danny Alexander. Apparently Beaker insisted on extra funds for mountain rescue teams, a VAT cut for ski lifts and the retention of the state subsidy for the Cairngorm Mountain Railway – all in his Highlands constituency.
And Lib Dem Chief Whip Alistair Carmichael (who?) apparently forced the abandonment of plans to cut the coastguard service, affecting his Orkney and Shetland constituency, claiming it was “a Coalition matter”.
So it must have been very difficult indeed for the comedy Prime Minister to return from holiday and learn of such appalling behaviour.
Difficult, but not a surprise.
Let’s face it – it’s little different from the way they behave when he’s at work.
Reblogged this on kickingthecat.
I should say that I have been receiving some wonderfully amusing comments in response to this article – none of which may be published, for legal reasons.
It’s a shame, because some are cripplingly funny. Apologies for not putting them up here but thanks for brightening my day!
Reblogged this on HUMAN RIGHTS & POLITICAL JOURNAL.
When it comes to prominent people, scandals relating to them are left to speculation, in the hope no doubt that someone can make a killing from being wrongly accused like Mc Alpine.
The sick and unemployed are defamed with no redress for hurt feelings by the press.
The difference is that the sick and unemployed are a large enough group that nobody can claim an accusation can reasonably relate to them.
Mike
Try telling that to the people on sickness or disability benefits who have taken their lives because they have not been able to pay the increases levied on them after a campaign of hatred by the press towards them.
The press are as culpable as the government in this mass killing.
I wasn’t making a moral point; I was stating the legal position. You know perfectly well that I find the demonization of the sick and disabled by the right-wing press abhorrent, and if you don’t, you need to have a look through previous Vox Political articles on the subject.
If i misinterpreted your words I apologize but to state that “nobody can claim that an accusation can REASONABLY relate to them” does not come across as in solidarity with the pressures that the press have put on the sick and unemployed collectively which manifests itself in individuals feeling it personally and why should they be made to feel like this?
That’s immaterial to the legality of the situation. I was making the distinction as a journalist with knowledge of the law. Individuals who see a direct reference to them, or members of a SMALL group mentioned in published matter, if it contains allegations which may be considered libellous, may take legal action against the publisher AND the writer with a reasonable chance of success. Members of a larger group (such as the unemployed or the sick) have no such legal recourse. I didn’t do it; it’s the law of the land.