Serial shaming for Iain Duncan Smith in Prime Minister’s Questions

151021IDSshame

Shame: Iain Duncan Smith.

No doubt the secretary-in-a-state about work and pensions won’t admit it, but any cabinet minister who comes under such a sustained assault during questions to the Prime Minister must be doing something wrong.

Iain Duncan Smith was attacked over the United Nations’ inquiry into the possibility that the UK has committed grave and systematic abuses of the human rights of disabled people, over suicides committed by benefit claimants due to DWP decisions, and over the vertiginous increase in food bank use. Just because David Cameron had to field the question, that doesn’t mean the Gentleman Ranker shouldn’t take the blame.

All this, on the day his new mascot (ha ha), a demonic-looking furry something called, ironically, Workie, made its debut in a nationwide TV advertising campaign costing more than £8.5 million. That’s money that could clearly have been better-spent elsewhere.

First up was Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn, quoting a party supporter he named ‘Louis’. Prefacing his question with the comment, “This is deeply embarrassing to all of us in this House and, indeed, to this country as a whole,” he read out the following:

“The United Kingdom is currently being investigated by the UN Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities because of allegations of ‘grave and systematic` violations of disabled people’s human rights.

“This is very sad news indeed, but it is even sadder that we need to be investigated because of violations that have occurred. Will the Prime Minister commit to co-operate fully with the inquiry and publish in full the Government’s response to it, so that we can ensure that people with disabilities are treated properly and legally and given full respect by and opportunities in our society?”

Cameron, perhaps briefed by his Work and Pensions secretary, would not. First, he twisted the question, trying to make it about the number of disabled people who have gained work under the Conservatives (tens of thousands, he reckoned. How many lost their jobs when the Tories closed Remploy, again? Nearly 2,000? And how many of those tens of thousands have gained permanent work? He didn’t say.

He continued: “Of course I will look at any United Nations investigation, but sometimes when you look at these investigations you find that they are not necessarily all they are originally cracked up to be.” Like Tory promises on tax credits (for example)?

“There are many disabled people in our world who do not have any of the rights or any of the support that they get here in Britain, and I think we should be proud of what we do as we co-operate with this report.” Shifting the goalposts, there. Bad conditions endured elsewhere in the world are not an excuse for a Conservative Government to worsen conditions here.

The SNP’s Westminster leader, Angus Robertson, touched on a favourite subject of This Writer when he said: “Information has recently been released showing that a coroner has found that a 60-year-old disabled father of two from north London, Mr Michael O’Sullivan, committed suicide following his work capability assessment. The coroner warned that there is a risk of further deaths. The Department for Work and Pensions has reportedly undertaken 60 investigations into suicides that occurred after benefits were withdrawn or reduced, but it has so far refused to publish what it has learned. Will the Prime Minister publish those findings?”

This was something of a missed opportunity as Mr Robertson could have asked why nobody has been prosecuted for causing Mr O’Sullivan to take his life. Never mind; This Writer has something in the pipeline about that, which will hopefully bring out some useful information.

Cameron didn’t have any: “I am aware of the case the hon. Gentleman raises, although I am sure he will understand that it would not be appropriate for me to discuss the specifics of the cases. Suicide is always a tragic and complex issue. We should take these matters incredibly seriously.” More seriously than this Prime Minister, certainly.

“I will look very carefully at the specific question he asks about publication.” But will he actually publish anything? And if so, will it be as opaque as the death figures the DWP released on August 27?

“We have changed the work capability assessment to lead to significant improvements, following a number of independent reviews, to make sure that people get the support that they need, and I think that is vitally important.” No – because the work capability assessment is still based on a disproved theory that illnesses and disabilities are all in benefit claimants’ minds.

Finally, Labour’s Jo Stevens pointed out: “Food bank use has risen by 1,665 per cent since the Prime Minister took office in 2010.”

HOW MUCH? Let’s have that again:

“1,665 per cent”

Is that one of the achievements that make Cameron “proud”, as he stated in his response to Mr Corbyn?

Back to Ms Stevens: “In Cardiff Central, I meet people every week who rely on food banks to feed their families. Does the Prime Minister know how many more families will be relying on food banks as a result of his Government’s cuts to tax credits, and does he care?”

He didn’t, so he quoted some figures about unemployment instead.

“Of course, I do not want anyone in our country to have to rely on food banks,” he lied (if he doesn’t, why have his policies led to such an exponential increase in their use?) before going on to highlight other Tory economic policies, at least one of which – the so-called National Living Wage – demonstrates perfectly why we cannot trust Tories.

A living wage is one that provides enough for people to cover all their costs without going into debt or resorting to benefits – unlike the forthcoming Tory version. If they can lie about that, they can lie about everything else.

And David Cameron, speaking for Iain Duncan Smith, is a dab hand at dishonesty.

Join the Vox Political Facebook page.

If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!

Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
(
but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:

Donate Button with Credit Cards

Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.

Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:

SWAHTprint SWAHTeBook

14 Comments

  1. Silvia Vousden October 21, 2015 at 8:22 pm - Reply

    I am getting sick and tired of Mr Cameron repeating the lie that the national debt is going down, it isn’t and someone should point this out as brilliantly as yourselves and Another Angry Voice. Deficit is not the same as debt, and I wish this was more blatantly pointed out by members of the opposition parties. The deficit can be reduced by abolishing the tax cuts of the very rich, not the tax credits of the very poor.

  2. Tony Dean October 21, 2015 at 8:22 pm - Reply

    Link to the Angus Robertson question with IDS looking worried at about 24 seconds in:-

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-34595093

    • Janice October 22, 2015 at 4:36 am - Reply

      Don’t think IDS looked worried at all. Same stance and stare and shook his head as usual. Man is devoid of any conscience.
      Never thought I could despise the Tories so much. These are grim times.

  3. che October 21, 2015 at 8:22 pm - Reply

    In the same PMQ Camoron stated tax credits cause poverty !

  4. Nick October 21, 2015 at 9:11 pm - Reply

    It is shocking we know that many countries all mainly conservative/communist abuse their people worldwide but that does not mean that the uk conservative government should do likewise because all the other countries do

  5. Russ Clewlow October 21, 2015 at 10:13 pm - Reply

    Here’s something I posted on FB earlier today regarding ‘Worky’
    There’s a well known phrase up here in the North East – ‘Worky Ticket’. It means Pushing ones luck. Pull a fast one. Causing trouble, sometimes in a mischevious way, sometimes in an agressive way. Forget the mischevious but the rest sums up IDS perfectly and his latest creation. Perhaps Mike you could add ‘Worky Ticket’ to your list of names for IDS along with RTU.

    • Mike Sivier October 22, 2015 at 12:34 am - Reply

      Seems like a good idea to me!

  6. Jane Jacques October 21, 2015 at 10:58 pm - Reply

    Great questions all, but no great answers back in response. Yes things are worse in other parts of the world for many things, and for the disabled as Cameron said. Does this mean his plan is to bring Britain down to the last but one place so he can always come out with ” things are worse in other parts of the world”.

    However he does not mention that unlike the other countries Britain is a rich country with a history of a welfare state and NHS and other state funded services, and that is one reason why we should care for people so much better than this Government.

    We should also working with other countries and aid agencies to help poorer countries develop their needs for these services via the Aid budget, not use it as an excuse to fail our own.

  7. NEXUS MA KIM October 21, 2015 at 11:33 pm - Reply

    So, no video then?

    • Mike Sivier October 22, 2015 at 12:35 am - Reply

      Tony Dean has posted a link to one.

  8. stevecheneysindieopinions4u October 22, 2015 at 6:24 am - Reply

    ““There are many disabled people in our world who do not have any of the rights or any of the support that they get here in Britain, and I think we should be proud of what we do as we co-operate with this report.” Shifting the goalposts, there. Bad conditions endured elsewhere in the world are not an excuse for a Conservative Government to worsen conditions here.”

    This brings back memories of when Blair was trying to convince us that his crackdowns (cracksdown?) on the right to protest and his flagrant disregard for the mass outpouring of opposition to his government’s actions were alright because, after all, if we were in Baghdad, we wouldn’t be able to protest, possibly, for all we know.

    When a PM starts using the equivalent of a “IF U DONT LEIK ENGERLUND, F*** OFF TO SYRIA!” Internet argument on national television, you know something’s up.

    • Mike Sivier October 22, 2015 at 9:45 am - Reply

      I think you’re right. It should be “cracksdown”.

  9. mrmarcpc October 22, 2015 at 3:18 pm - Reply

    Time this charlatan and all the rest of them were brought to bear for what they’ve done, the debt is worse than it’s ever been, more people are on the dole and more people are less well off, how is that better, New Labour’s got nothing on these chinless wonders and like them, they should be out!

Leave A Comment