Is this how Osborne negotiated Google’s corporation tax payment?

Last Updated: January 29, 2016By

160129OsborneGoogleTaxNegotiation

The reference to the Chancellor’s family business, Osborne and Little, has the ring of truth about it, don’t you think?

Join the Vox Political Facebook page.

If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!

Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
(
but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:

Donate Button with Credit Cards

Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.

Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:

SWAHTprint SWAHTeBook

latest video

news via inbox

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

No Comments

  1. Dez January 29, 2016 at 9:07 pm - Reply

    Great to know we are all in this together. This years tax form contained inquisition type questions enquiring if one used an advisor and/or utilised a tax avoidance schemes? Great….was this for the newly formed village renegades or all the little guys playing with light tax ideas. The big multi country blue chip big boys will not be completing this form and swearing the form contents are true and fully declaring avoidance scheme etc.
    It’s still one for the rich one for the poor.

  2. mohandeer January 29, 2016 at 9:24 pm - Reply

    All the inuendo and possibilities are “probably” true

  3. Terry Davies January 30, 2016 at 4:13 pm - Reply

    the taxes for all corporations should incur penalties. MPs who want a chancery should have no business interests during their time in office. Maybe this principle should apply to all MPs in office.

    • Mike Sivier February 3, 2016 at 3:34 pm - Reply

      Why would they want a division of the High Court, or an office in an embassy or consulate?

Leave A Comment