David Cameron faces questions from journalists about his family’s tax affairs during a visit to PwC in Birmingham

His body language betrays him: The hand up to his head suggests David Cameron was trying to conceal the facts when he faced questions from journalists about his family’s tax affairs during a visit to PwC in Birmingham. PwC is, of course, one of the ‘Big Four’ accountancy firms that helps write tax law in the UK – and is responsible for a huge number of tax avoidance schemes about which the Conservative Government has done very little.

After no less than four different statements on the subject, David Cameron is still no closer to telling us whether he is really going to benefit from his father’s tax avoidance.

Three statements yesterday – and now a fourth one today (April 6) – have claimed that he and his family do not currently receive money from offshore funds and trusts, and will not receive money from offshore sources in the future.

But Blairmore Holdings, the company created for tax avoidance purposes by Cameron’s late father Ian, moved to Ireland in 2010, according to the Telegraph. Does that count as offshore, in the mind of the person or people who wrote those statements?

Nobody seems to be asking about the reasons for creating Blairmore to avoid tax in the first place. Certainly Cameron Sr wanted to enjoy the benefits of a reduced tax bill in his lifetime, and nothing has been said about the financial affairs of his wife, the prime minister’s mother Mary. It seems highly unlikely that she does not benefit from Blairmore or a similar fund. What happens when she passes away?

In short: If David Cameron is not receiving funds from this tax avoidance venture, then who is?

Cameron has certainly gained financially from Blairmore in the past – he received £300,000 from his father in Cameron Sr’s will, after Ian Cameron died in 2010. This means there are questions still to be asked about the Conservative Government’s lax attitude to tax avoidance, which can be summed up in four words: “Talk hard, be soft.”

For example, Chris Bryant – who was responsible for overseas territories and dependencies when Labour was in power – was involved in a standoff with them over transparency. He had pressed them to be more transparent and tried to put pressure on them by refusing to authorise loans, but the standoff ended when the Conservatives took office in 2010. The Tories simply dropped the matter.

Perhaps most importantly of all, with an election now just one month away, this affair has shaken voters’ confidence in the Conservative Party.

How can we believe Tory election promises when we know they don’t act on those pledges?

Join the Vox Political Facebook page.

If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!

Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
(
but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:

Donate Button with Credit Cards

Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.

Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:

SWAHTprint SWAHTeBook