Asylum and immigration court fees set to rise by more than 500 per cent

Last Updated: April 22, 2016By
The rises are nothing to do with asylum or immigration - they're being brought in to help pay off the Ministry of Justice’s funding deficit [Image: Dan Kitwood/Getty Images].

The rises are nothing to do with asylum or immigration – they’re being brought in to help pay off the Ministry of Justice’s funding deficit [Image: Dan Kitwood/Getty Images].

Richard Murphy of Tax Research UK has said “anyone who calls this justice is a liar” – but the situation is even worse than that.

This vertiginous rise in fees is being imposed not because the administration of asylum and immigration cases requires it, but because the Ministry of Justice is short of a few quid.

The aim, therefore, is to raise £37 million a year with the extra charges – made against people who are likely to have very little money, or none at all. How are they supposed to pay?

It is far more likely that people will be put off making legal applications for asylum or to immigrate here, and will simply try to stay in the UK illegally.

Meanwhile the Ministry of Justice will go without even the money it previously received for asylum and immigration applications and will slip further into debt.

Still, that’s Tory budgeting for you: When businesses run by these rich fools suffer money troubles, they try to squeeze cash out of people who don’t have any.

Asylum and immigration tribunal fees are set to increase by more than 500% in order to help pay off the Ministry of Justice’s funding deficit.

The proposed steep rise in application costs aimed at raising £37m a year is likely to serve as a deterrent to many, preventing those who have arrived in the UK with few resources from challenging decisions to deport them.

Basic fees in the first-tier asylum and immigration tribunals should be increased from £80 to £490 for an application for a decision just on the legal papers, according to an MoJ consultation launched on Thursday. That is more than a fivefold rise.

Fees for a full tribunal hearing should rise from £140 to £800, the MOJ suggests. An extra £455 fee is likely to be introduced to cover applications for permission to appeal to the upper tribunal against first-tier tribunal rulings.

The MoJ said it was “no longer reasonable to expect the taxpayer to fund around 75% of the costs of immigration and asylum proceedings”. Earlier this year the justice secretary, Michael Gove, announced steep increases in probate fees.

This week it was revealed that the MoJ had been forced to borrow £427m from the Treasury last year to cover the cost of a surge in sex offence trials and an unexpected shortfall in fees from other sources.

Source: Asylum and immigration court fees set to rise by over 500% | UK news | The Guardian

Join the Vox Political Facebook page.

If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!

Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
(
but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:

Donate Button with Credit Cards

Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.

Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:

SWAHTprint SWAHTeBook

latest video

news via inbox

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

3 Comments

  1. Terry Davies April 22, 2016 at 11:11 am - Reply

    this will make visa entry requirements change too. an increase of fee is likely admin costs increase as another application form will probably be devised to allow for increased penalties should entrants not adhere to immigration / migrant requirements.

  2. Gigi April 22, 2016 at 2:58 pm - Reply

    This is very unjust.

  3. Barry Davies April 22, 2016 at 3:28 pm - Reply

    I wonder if this is a precursor of charging for PIP appeals

Leave A Comment