Private prison run by Serco cancelled brain scan that could have saved immigration detainee

Last Updated: May 26, 2016By
[Image: Serco.]

[Image: Serco.]

Would Bruno Dos Santos be alive if staff employed by private firm Serco had understood the rules? Possibly.

Is Serco to blame for the death?

That has yet to be determined. The verdict could be groundbreaking with regard to the employment of private firms to run prisons.

Healthcare staff at Thameside Prison in London were unaware that a young man in their care was detained for immigration purposes, which led to him missing a hospital appointment that might have saved his life, an inquest jury heard yesterday.

Bruno Dos Santos, 25, was detained at HMP Thameside for several months from September 2013 until May 2014, a court sitting in Dorchester was told yesterday. In May he was transferred to the Verne Immigration Removal Centre in Dorset, where he died on 4 June.

Dos Santos had a complex medical history and was taking medication for epilepsy, depression and shoulder pain. He suffered from severe epileptic fits and had dislocated both shoulders as a result of frequent seizures. In February 2014, while detained at Thameside, Dos Santos was assessed by Dr Giovanni Cocco, a consultant neurologist.

Following the appointment Dr Cocco wrote to a GP working at the prison explaining that the young man’s fits were a result of trauma after being knocked down by car aged 10. After the car accident Dos Santos was in a coma for two or three days. He then spent several months in hospital re-learning how to walk, talk and carry out basic tasks. Dr Cocco recommended Dos Santos undergo an MRI, EEG and an ECG, and that his anti-epileptic medication be increased gradually. An MRI appointment was booked for 23 February.

The court heard that Rida Kamsilla, a nurse working at Thameside, spoke to Dos Santos the day before his appointment on 23 February. When he told her about it, she told the wing officer that Dos Santos “is not going anywhere tomorrow”. She then passed the same message on to the senior nurse on duty asking for the appointment to be cancelled. Nurse Kamsilla told the court that she was following prison policy at the time, which was that patients should not be given dates regarding external appointments. This was for security reasons, she said.

Nick Brown, the barrister representing the family, suggested that Nurse Kamsilla had been “over officious” in making this decision. “It was not your decision to make,” he said. Instead, he said, she should have passed it on to another member of staff to carry out a proper risk assessment. She replied that she was simply following the policy. Brown asked if the policy was written anywhere and nurse Kamsilla replied that it was not. Brown then questioned the nurse about Dos Santos’s immigration status.

Brown: “Were you aware that he was an immigration detainee?”

Kamsilla: “No, I was not aware.”

Brown: “Were you aware of the policy on immigration detainees at that time?”

Kamsilla: “No.”

Brown then read from the Detention Services Order 2012 which states that: “Every effort must be made to keep and fulfil medical appointments of detainees, both those arranged prior to and during detention.”

The rules also state that external appointments must be considered on a case by case basis, he said. This assessment would consider factors such as the seriousness of the condition of the detainee.

Source: Private prison run by Serco cancelled immigration detainee’s brain scan | openDemocracy

ADVERT




Join the Vox Political Facebook page.

If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!

Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
(
but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:

Donate Button with Credit Cards

Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.

Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:

SWAHTprint SWAHTeBook

latest video

news via inbox

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

3 Comments

  1. Phil Lee May 27, 2016 at 3:00 am - Reply

    That “nurse”, Rida Kamsilla, needs striking off the register, and Serco charged with corporate manslaughter, at the very least.
    And Serco have shown that they are unfit to be running any public services, so should be removed from any they are running and excluded from consideration for any further ones.

  2. casalealex May 27, 2016 at 8:08 am - Reply

    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/serco-given-yarls-wood-immigration-contract-despite-vast-failings-9880772.html

    Serco given Yarl’s Wood immigration contract despite ‘vast failings’

    http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/home-news/serco-has-failed-over-asylum-seeker-worries.25972884

    Serco ‘has failed over asylum seeker worries’

    http://www.theguardian.com/business/2014/nov/10/serco-profits-warning-shares-crash

    Serco shares crash after latest profits warning

    http://www.theguardian.com/business/2014/nov/11/australian-detention-centre-profit-propping-up-serco

    Australian detention centre profits propping up UK’s Serco

    nt.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/serco-faces-fresh-allegations-over-its-running-of-yarls-wood-detention-centre-9849243.html

    Serco faces fresh allegations over its running of Yarl’s Wood detention centre

    Why does this country use these infamous private companies to get away with murder?

  3. shaun May 28, 2016 at 10:04 pm - Reply

    Dear Casalealex, It keeps using these private companies because Cameron, Blair and others in power believe the provision of public services, for any service and under any circumstance is always bad; whereas, the provision of public services by private enterprise is always the best solution. This for them is a matter of faith (not to mention the generation of wealth for themselves), and so not only is evidence not required to support their belief, but contrary facts are a positive distraction from their message.

Leave A Comment