Online advertising raises more Tory electoral fraud claims
Battle bus: It seems this is not the only area in which the Conservatives lied about their spending.
Online advertising paid off massively for the Conservative Party in the 2015 General Election. It’s just a shame the Tories don’t seem to have declare the spending in their expenses returns.
So now Energy Secretary Amber Rudd and Amber Valley MP Nigel Mill are facing allegations that they used ads designed by M & C Saatchi in their local campaigns, but failed to declare them in their spending returns.
And then there is the allegation by New Scientist that the Conservatives spent £1.3 million on Facebook ads in the 40 constituencies they needed to win the election – that’s £32,500 per constituency, which is more than twice as much as the local spending limit in the ‘short’ campaign.
Here’s how the Mirror reported the allegations against the individual MPs:
The Tories paid £395,575 to M&C Saatchi for advertising costs in the run up to poll last May, including one “wrecking ball” advert.
The poster and video ad used the slogan “Recovering Economy” and a wrecking ball carrying the words “Don’t Let Labour Wreck It”.
These costs were declared nationally as party spending where the Tories were more than £2 million below the spending cap.
But Amber Rudd, Secretary of State for Energy, ran what appeared to be a local version of the same advert on her YouTube channel on March 29. The slogan was changed to “Unemployment down by 1,921 in Hastings and Rye since 2010”.
It was uploaded on March 29, the last day of the “long campaign”, but does not appear in Ms Rudd’s long campaign election spending return.
Under “advertising”, the only online costs declared were a series of Facebook ads and one £60 bill to her local conservative association for a “pop up banner”.
Another Tory MP, Nigel Mills, posted what appeared to be a local version of the “wrecking ball” ad with the slogan changed to “Unemployment down by 59% in Amber Valley since 2010”.
It was uploaded to the votenigelmills YouTube channel on April 8, during the short campaign, which lasts for the final 39 days before the vote. But the only online costs Mr Mills declared for the short campaign was £76 paid by his local conservative association for registering and hosting votenigelmills.com.
Mr Mills is being investigated by Derbyshire Police for failing to declare the costs of a ‘battle bus’ packed with party activists, but more than a year has passed since Ms Rudd filed her return, meaning she cannot be prosecuted under the Representation of the People Act 1983.
Meanwhile, here’s the New Scientist on how the Tories targeted 40 constituencies they needed:
In the 2015 UK general election, the Conservatives spent £1.3 million on Facebook adverts, targeting people who lived in the 40 constituencies they needed for a majority. Before the vote, everything pointed to a hung parliament, with the Labour party likely to be the largest party. On the night, the Tories came out on top.
Source: How your Facebook feed will affect your Brexit vote | New Scientist
The article doesn’t say whether the money was spent in the ‘long’ campaign or the ‘short’, but if it was declared as a national expense, then this was wrong; the article specifically states that this was spending “targeting people who lived in the 40 constituencies they needed for a majority”.
It seems to This Writer that, even after months of digging, we have not yet plumbed the depths of Conservative corruption with regard to last year’s general election.
The one-year deadline for opening investigations has now passed – or at least, it has for most MPs – so it seems likely that many who won their Parliamentary seats by criminally out-spending their opponents will go unpunished.
If the Conservatives had an ounce of decency about them, they would admit the investigation has undermined public faith in the legitimacy of their government. They should declare the last election void and call another one.
They haven’t done this, and they won’t. Draw your own conclusions.
ADVERT
Join the Vox Political Facebook page.
If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!
Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
(but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:
Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.
Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:
The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:
to act honestly to be upfront to help britain forward isnt the tory way just dishonesty and they in power ops jeff3
This Tory Government is hiding it’s smug smiles because it know’s no-one can touch them. They have made a mockery of the British Democracy, henceforth in their honour to be known as the British Democratic Debacle.
It’s becoming endemic.
In an online discussion with the leader of my local council i came across a video (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ogV5Mrzaeck) that they posted the day before the local council elections this year – as a aside I asked (given the current interest in such things) if they had declared the cost of its production on their electoral expenses. Their (Donna Jones) response was “no costs were incurred in the 2016 election video. Happy to be open and transparent” – i then retorted “no costs at all? I’m surprised! Was all the media and music supplied “royalty free”? Was is produced, in any part, by an employee of PCC? I’ll check, but would expect it would still have to recorded in your election expenses as pro-bono, in the interests of transparency”.
I’ve since forwarded details to the electoral commission for clarification.
The Tory regime has no legitimacy, and if they won’t go willingly, and if no legal process is used to remove them, we are only left with one alternative – people power.
If they don’t respond to pressure, revolution is the only option remaining, and as it is a matter of life and death for many people, is entirely justified (and therefore legal) as self-defence.