Dubs refugee scheme could be reinstated as Commons lose faith in Tory excuses

Last Updated: March 7, 2017By

A girl takes part in a protest outside Downing Street to call for Britain to accept more refugee children [Image: Guy Bell/Rex/Shutterstock].

It’s interesting that the Tory government has claimed there aren’t any council places for children to be housed under the ‘Dubs amendment’ scheme for refugee children – councils have said this isn’t true at all.

And, you know, This Writer seems to remember the Tories claiming that the Dubs scheme could be used for people trafficking – a pernicious claim as it was intended to prevent that crime.

The Home Affairs Select Committee said evidence from charities and other organisations contradicted the Home Office’s assertion.

Oh, and what about Amber Rudd’s claim that the UK has already allowed thousands of refugee children in?

Forgotten, it seems.

Let us hope that humanity prevails when this matter is debated today (March 7).

The government faces a potential Commons defeat over its decision to end the arrival of unaccompanied refugee children under the Dubs scheme, with up to 30 Conservative MPs possibly voting to revive the process.

Ministers announced last month that the numbers arriving under the system, introduced through an amendment by the Labour peer Lord Alf Dubs, who came to Britain as a child refugee before the second world war, was to be stopped at the current 350.

Campaigners had hoped that as many as 3,000 children could be helped. The government said the scheme had to end because no more council spaces were available to accommodate them.

However, some councils have since disputed this, saying they do have the resources to take more unaccompanied minors.

The issue will be the subject of a House of Commons vote on Tuesday when MPs debate amendments attached to the wider children and social work bill, connected to the status of child refugees.

Source: Up to 30 Tory MPs could vote against ministers over Dubs refugee scheme | World news | The Guardian

Join the Vox Political Facebook page.

If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!

Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
(
but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:

Donate Button with Credit Cards

Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.


The Livingstone Presumption is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:

SWAHTprint SWAHTeBook

latest video

news via inbox

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

One Comment

  1. Barry Davies March 7, 2017 at 10:00 am - Reply

    I wonder which councils have said there is space for them given the amount of homeless and the length of waiting lists for publicly owned housing, also if they are children where exactly are they going to be housed anyway there is a pitiful amount of children accommodation outside the penal system.

Leave A Comment