Who will (unofficially) sponsor David Cameron’s next Prime Ministerial statements?


Tobacco, fracking or private health companies seem the most likely choices.

The Conservative-led Coalition has become an excellent practitioner of bait-and-switch fraud, it seems. First it ‘baits’ the general public by promising a new law, reforming part of society that is seen to have fallen below the standards expected here in the UK. Then it ‘switches’ the legislation into something else entirely.

So it is with plans for a new law to end lobbying scandals. It won’t do anything of the sort. In fact, it is likely to lessen the legal burdens on lobbyists.

However, it will impose onerous new burdens on trade unions and charities, in what the Trade Union Congress has described as “an outrageous attack on freedom of speech worthy of an authoritarian dictatorship”.

(This is not to say that the TUC believes the UK government is similar to an authoritarian dictatorship. View it instead as the TUC saying this is what the UK government has become under the Coalition)

The Transparency of Lobbying, non-Party Campaigning, and Trade Union Administration Bill apparently features a new, looser definition of ‘campaigning’ that risks including all activities that could be seen as critical of the government of the day – and if any government was likely to crack down on such activities, on any day, it’s this one!

Mr Cameron’s spokesman said this was not the aim, and that the plan was to ensure lobbyists’ allegiances are known, ascertain how much money is spent on third-party political campaigning and ensure trade unions know who their members are. His words may have been sponsored by CTF Partners (look them up).

The proposals are likely to introduce a statutory register of consultant lobbyists, but only firms which say it is their main business need register, only firms which meet ministers and senior civil servants need declare whom they represent, and in-house lobbyists are also exempt – so, from 988 meetings between the Department for Business and lobbyists in 2012, only two were with consultant lobbyists who would have had to declare the meetings under the new law.

An Independent article stated that the plans lack credibility and are regarded as “a bad joke” inside the UK’s £2 billion lobbying industry – so much so that the chairman of Parliament’s Political and Constitutional Reform Select Committee recalled its members before the end of the summer recess, to hold evidence sessions on what he has described as a “dog’s breakfast”.

Graham Allen MP (Labour) told the paper, “This flawed legislation will mean we’ll all be back in a year facing another scandal.”

And lobbyists themselves said the industry could gain nothing from flawed legislation. Iain Anderson, chairman of the Association of Professional Political Consultants (APPC) and director of the lobbying company Cicero, said: “This law will only undermine public confidence.”

The planned legislation would also set a cap on the amount any organisation other than political parties could spend during elections, and would end self-certification of union membership numbers for all but the smallest unions, with records checked by an independent officer.

TUC general secretary Frances O’Grady said in the BBC article that “this rushed Bill has nothing to do with cleaning up lobbying or getting big money out of politics. Instead it is a crude and politically partisan attack on trade unions, particularly those who affiliate to the Labour Party”. Bait-and-switch, see?

But she said the plan was much worse than that: “Its chilling effect will be to shut down dissent for the year before an election. No organisation that criticises a government policy will be able to overdraw their limited ration of dissent without fearing a visit from the police.”

Mr Cameron, now revealed as a corporate mouthpiece after his U-turn on plans for plain packaging on cigarettes (his election strategist Lynton Crosby also works for a major tobacco corporation), his support for fracking (several leading Tories stand to benefit if the process becomes widespread) and his government’s privatisation of the National Health Service, amazingly promised to crack down on lobbying in the Coalition agreement with the Liberal Democrats after he, himself, described it as the “next big political scandal”.

If fears are borne out, the new law would have a direct effect on Vox Political and blogs like it. Rest assured that VP will continue criticising government policy and demanding better from the opposition.

They can’t say we overspend – we don’t have any budget at all.

My e-petition calling for MPs to be banned from voting on matters in which they have a financial interest is here, and is nearly at the point where a reply will be required from the relevant government department. Please support it with your signature, if you haven’t already done so.


  1. Mike Sivier August 19, 2013 at 8:22 pm - Reply

    And here’s a new entry in our ‘Soundbite Britain’ sayings: “Lobbyists – buying democracy while the government sells you dictatorship.”

    • bob archer August 20, 2013 at 6:37 pm - Reply

      hell, im shedding tears of frustration,cos im old and disabled,and cant do anything.god bless you mike,and keep doing what pussy miliband should be doing.and thats fighting for the masses. ps;why not send miliband all your blogs and show him what hes not seeing. or better still,give it to him in person,and ask him to respond to you then you can tell all of us what he says.

      • Mike Sivier August 20, 2013 at 7:43 pm - Reply

        That’s not a bad idea. I mean, I have just collected a load of them into a book, after all…

  2. Alex Casale August 19, 2013 at 9:20 pm - Reply

    Once a government is committed to the principle of silencing the voice of opposition, it has only one way to go, and that is down the path of increasingly repressive measures, until it becomes a source of terror to all its citizens and creates a country where everyone lives in fear.”― Harry S. Truman

  3. […] form Who will (unofficially) sponsor David Cameron’s next Prime Ministerial statements?. 722 […]

  4. Smiling Carcass August 20, 2013 at 4:27 am - Reply

    Reblogged at http://smilingcarcass.wordpress.com/2013/08/20/who-will-unofficially-sponsor-david-camerons-next-prime-ministerial-statements/ with the the comment “My personal opinion is don’t allow lobbying where there is a demonstrable interest. If an MP or his family or close associates would or could gain political, financial or other personal advantage from supporting a “lobbyist’s agenda, then they should be barred from speaking or voting on the issue.

  5. […] Tobacco, fracking or private health companies seem the most likely choices. The Conservative-led Coalition has become an excellent practitioner of bait-and-switch fraud, it seems. First it 'baits' …  […]

  6. sparaszczukster August 20, 2013 at 8:39 am - Reply

    Reblogged this on Grannie's Last Mix and commented:
    This is VITALLY important. Please share it as far and wide as you can.

  7. Brett Snelling August 20, 2013 at 1:18 pm - Reply

    British Democracy the best that money can buy

  8. […] else. Remember, the Conservatives are well-practised at ‘bait-and-switch’ fraud, as mentioned in an earlier article. Perhaps they don’t want us examining their lackadaisical attempts at pretending to counter […]

Leave A Comment