Plan to give Labour’s NEC power over policy are an attack on Corbyn’s democratisation of the party

Last Updated: January 22, 2016By

The sign says “I voted for a new kind of politics”, but Jon Lansman’s proposals would take power away from that person [Image: Justin Tallis/AFP/Getty].

How strange that a founder of Momentum, which is supposed to be a group created in support of Jeremy Corbyn, would propose something that directly contradicts Corbyn’s plan to democratise Labour.

One of the most attractive Corbyn policies is his claim that policy-making power should be taken back from committees like the NPF and the NEC, and put directly into the hands of members – hence his shadow chancellor, John McDonnell’s call for party members to be consulted directly on Labour’s policy on nuclear weapons.

Now here’s someone who says he’s a Corbyn supporter, trying to put the mockers on it.

This Blog says “NO” to Jon Lansman’s proposals. This Writer, despite being a member of the Labour Party, had never heard of them until I read this Guardian article.

A row is brewing before Labour’s national executive committee meets next week after a series of proposals tabled by a leading supporter of Jeremy Corbyn were described as “political and divisive”.

The NEC is to examine calls to give it a greater say over policymaking – at the expense of the national policy forum – and to give the committee a decisive say over the recruitment of Labour party staff.

Critics of Corbyn were alarmed by a set of proposals tabled by Jon Lansman, a veteran supporter of Tony Benn who co-founded the pro-Corbyn Momentum group. Lansman, who is not a member of the NEC but is influential, is proposing that an NEC policy and coordination committee should “oversee and coordinate all aspects of the party’s policymaking process”. An NEC staffing committee should “make all senior appointments” in consultation with the Labour leader’s office, Lansman said.

Source: Plans to give Labour’s NEC more say over policy attacked as ‘political and divisive’ | Politics | The Guardian

Join the Vox Political Facebook page.

If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!

Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
(
but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:

Donate Button with Credit Cards

Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.

Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:

SWAHTprint SWAHTeBook

latest video

news via inbox

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

No Comments

  1. sp4mf15h January 22, 2016 at 10:52 pm - Reply

    Are you sure you are not mistaken here Mike. I am fairly sure the proposals by Landsman are what Jeremy wants. The NEC to help make policy rather than the PLP

    • Mike Sivier January 22, 2016 at 11:25 pm - Reply

      The PLP doesn’t make policy in any event.

  2. philwoodford (@philwoodford) January 22, 2016 at 11:14 pm - Reply

    Just the old sectarian battles of the hard left played out once again. All part of Corbyn’s 80s Revival Party.

    • Mike Sivier January 22, 2016 at 11:55 pm - Reply

      You can’t lay it at Corbyn’s feet when it isn’t a policy he supports.

  3. Florence January 23, 2016 at 1:00 pm - Reply

    Is this a move to restore the powers of the NEC before Blaire stripped them out, so he could have a Presidential grip on policy? I suspect more cock-up here, rather than anything else. The Blairites are a fading force, and we can’t allow the party to be moulded simply as a response to them – we need it to respond to the majority. I always thought that “back in the day” that NEC policy proposals were always subject to ratification by conference, which put the power back with the members through CLP.

Leave A Comment