Facebook’s response to evidence of sexualised child imagery – report complainant to police
An image Facebook initially said did not breach standards appeared to be a still from a child abuse video, the BBC says [Image: Karen Bleier/AFP/Getty].
The incident in which the BBC was reported to the police for pointing out that images that appeared to show child sex abuse were being distributed on the site amounts to protection of the abusers.
It is a wonder Facebook itself has not faced prosecution. It should.
And in the background, the moderation system itself remains as unreliable as it ever was – because Facebook wants to keep it that way.
Can anybody suggest an effective solution?
“Grave doubts” have emerged about the effectiveness of Facebook’s moderation system after an investigation revealed the social network was failing to remove sexualised images of children even after they were reported.
Damian Collins, chair of the culture, media and sport committee, made the comments as he criticised Facebook’s handling of the images, dozens of which were reported to the company by the BBC and fewer than 20% were removed.
After the BBC sent evidence of the photos to Facebook, the social media company reported the BBC to the police for distributing the images, which had been shared on private Facebook groups intended for paedophiles.
“I find it very disturbing. I find that content unacceptable,” Collins said. “I think it raises the question of how can users make effective complaints to Facebook about content that is disturbing, shouldn’t be on the site, and have confidence that that will be acted upon.”
Collins said the decision of Facebook to report the BBC to the police was “extraordinary – because you’re trying to help them clean up their network, from material that shouldn’t be there”.
Source: Facebook’s response over sexualised child images is ‘extraordinary’ | Technology | The Guardian
Join the Vox Political Facebook page.
If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!
Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
(but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:
Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.
The Livingstone Presumption is now available
in either print or eBook format here:
Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:
The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:
They are also happy with posts showing abuse of animals but only remove posts and pages of animal lovers showing!
Seems like they want to be the ‘one stop shop’ for all paedophiles and abusers!
While Farcebook’s reporting of the Beeb to the police and my knowledge of it makes me think FB are in the wrong, I don’t trust the Beeb to properly criticise another news organisation (which is a large part of what FB essentially does). Maybe the images just offended the Blue Rinse Brigade, maybe they were worthy of investigation, maybe they were child porn, but I’m not going to blindly trust Auntie Beeb nor Damian Collins when they’ve been accusing FB of being a purveyor of fake news.