News media: Don’t criticise Labour for falling membership without knowing WHY

Last Updated: March 22, 2017By

Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn addresses delegates and members at the party conference last year. Look at the body language in the image chosen by the Guardian‘s editors – like he’s challenging the members. That’s deliberate – to create an impression of an adversarial leader who stands against the members, rather than one with the majority of his party supporting him [Image: Christopher Furlong/Getty Images].

Here’s The Guardian making a pig’s ear out of a reported fall in Labour membership figures.

Deputy political editor Rowena Mason seems keen to pin the fall on disenchantment with Jeremy Corbyn, but the evidence doesn’t demonstrate this.

Firstly, the report shows that 40,000 members are in arrears – many are likely to pay their sub after a reminder.

Ms Mason is forced to admit that it is not known whether the lapsed members are supporters or detractors of Mr Corbyn.

And the information that many resigned because Labour supported the Article 50 Bill is unhelpful because, of course, this was a decision by the party to support the result of the EU membership referendum, that was made before the referendum took place and to which the leadership was honour-bound to adhere.

Some MPs reneged against that promise, but that reflects poorly on them, not Mr Corbyn or the party generally.

The simple fact is that a small drop in membership was inevitable after the activity of recent months.

Labour remains the largest political party in the UK – bigger than all the other main parties put together.

Ms Mason skates over this by merely providing membership figures for the other parties without drawing the obvious conclusion.

And there’s always the opportunity to get a rentaquote from a right-wing party member to reinforce the slant Ms Mason wants to put on the story.

This is a poorly-conceived effort to denigrate the current left-wing Labour leadership. Whatever happened to the Graun‘s integrity?

Labour membership is expected to fall below half a million for the first time since its peak under Jeremy Corbyn because about 40,000 people are in arrears.

The unusual number of lapsed payments was discussed at a meeting of Labour’s ruling national executive committee (NEC) on Tuesday, as the drop will hit Labour’s budget.

A source present at the meeting said the number of members who are up to date with their payments is now about 483,000, with about 40,000 having fallen behind.

Updated data was presented to the NEC on Tuesday, but it is hard to know if those failing to renew their membership are supporters of Corbyn who joined to vote in the leadership contest, or his opponents who do not like the direction the party is taking.

A Labour source said many of those who gave a reason for resigning their membership said it was because of Corbyn’s decision to whip his MPs in favour of voting for article 50.

Source: Labour membership expected to fall below half a million | Politics | The Guardian

Join the Vox Political Facebook page.

If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!

Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
(
but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:

Donate Button with Credit Cards

Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.


The Livingstone Presumption is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:

SWAHTprint SWAHTeBook

latest video

news via inbox

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

8 Comments

  1. chriskitcher March 22, 2017 at 11:55 am - Reply

    Perhaps they can no longer afford to pay due to the Tory governments austerity measures?

  2. David Woods March 22, 2017 at 12:25 pm - Reply

    What is far more concerning is how many MP’s are happy to ignore a democratic result!
    Labour MP’s willing to ignore their party members choice of leader – it wasn’t the result they wanted so forced another ‘election’ which they again lost and they still fight against ‘the people’s choice’!
    MP’s of all parties refusing to accept the people’s choice of Brexit!
    75% of voters turned out to vote on Brexit; Average for general elections 30%, local elections less than 20% yet never a cry of wrong result we need another election from any of them!
    Whenever MP’s are ‘caught out’ they all close ranks and shut out the public; Has any of the illegally obtained expenses ‘ever’ been returned to the public purse?
    Does anyone truly believe the Tories will be punished for their election fraud?

    Personally I think if anyone believes what any MP says these days they need to seriously work on their gullibility issues!

    • Mike Sivier March 23, 2017 at 11:15 pm - Reply

      The average turnout for general elections is much higher than 30 per cent. The winning party usually has around 30 per cent of the vote, though.

  3. John Thatcher March 22, 2017 at 1:17 pm - Reply

    What Guardian integrity?

  4. Ian bradshaw March 22, 2017 at 5:18 pm - Reply

    No mention of the ones who joined specifically to support Smith, and have now left.

    • Mike Sivier March 23, 2017 at 4:21 pm - Reply

      Did anyone do that?

  5. Audrey POOL March 22, 2017 at 7:35 pm - Reply

    I believe that its the fact that the labour party is denying new members voting rights and equality with older members and constantly changing the rules to stop new members(particularly Corbyn supporters) from influencing branch and national policies that is responsible for any downturn in membership.

    • Mike Sivier March 23, 2017 at 3:50 pm - Reply

      So you’d blame the right-wing apparatchiks who currently hold senior positions in the party, rather than the party itself, I think.
      I would agree.

Leave A Comment