How many of the BBC’s household names are also tax cheats?

Last Updated: October 13, 2018By Tags: , , , , , , ,

Breaking news: But this time the BBC is the news.

You see that household-name BBC TV presenter you like so much? Chances are, they’ve been cheating on their taxes.

That’s what HM Revenue and Customs is implying in its revelation that more than 100 BBC presenters are being investigated for alleged tax avoidance.

So, while you and I have been working hard to pay the TV licence fee – a tax imposed on all of us before we can watch not only BBC shows but any TV at all – it seems they have been ducking out of paying their fair share.

And they’re being paid a fortune! We’re discussing people who have been paid at least £150,000 per year.

I should stress that this is only an investigation; nobody has actually been found guilty of anything – yet.

But if they are, This Writer wants them to be named and punished.

As for the BBC itself – the Corporation seems to have allowed these people to cheat by paying them through personal service companies, whatever they may be.

What’s wrong with good old Pay As You Earn? The rest of us have to put up with it – why not these entitled ‘faces’?

More than 100 BBC presenters are under investigation for alleged tax avoidance after being suspected of wrongly using personal service companies to minimise their tax bills, HMRC has revealed.

A “very significant number of BBC news presenters” – as well as a number of staff at other broadcasters – face demands to hand over unpaid tax and national insurance contributions after HMRC launched a probe into whether stars had incorrectly declared themselves to be self-employed.

The BBC announced in July that it had moved 85 presenters onto its books as full-time employees, after a report published in 2012 found that the corporation paid more than 124 stars in excess of £150,000 a year via personal service companies.

Source: More than 100 BBC stars facing tax avoidance inquiry, HMRC reveals

Visit our JustGiving page to help Vox Political’s Mike Sivier fight anti-Semitism libels in court


Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
(
but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:

Donate Button with Credit Cards

Here are four ways to be sure you’re among the first to know what’s going on.

1) Register with us by clicking on ‘Subscribe’ (in the left margin). You can then receive notifications of every new article that is posted here.

2) Follow VP on Twitter @VoxPolitical

3) Like the Facebook page at https://www.facebook.com/VoxPolitical/

Join the Vox Political Facebook page.

4) You could even make Vox Political your homepage at http://voxpoliticalonline.com

And do share with your family and friends – so they don’t miss out!

If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!

Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.


The Livingstone Presumption is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:

SWAHTprint SWAHTeBook

7 Comments

  1. Tony October 13, 2018 at 10:23 am - Reply

    I can well remember when Terry Wogan said he was going to waive his fee for doing ‘Children in Need’ one year.

    I was shocked to learn that he had not been doing it already.

  2. nmac064 October 13, 2018 at 10:37 am - Reply

    The nasty fraudulent cheating world of Tory Britain.

  3. Barry Davies October 13, 2018 at 11:04 am - Reply

    Tax avoidance isn’t really regarded as a criminal offence because it means bending rather than breaking the rules, the government needs to tighten up the wording on the legislation so that avoidance can be avoided before it tries anything else.

  4. trev October 13, 2018 at 12:06 pm - Reply

    This should make an interesting News report, they’ll have to interview themselves!

  5. Mr Colin Glazebrook October 13, 2018 at 4:16 pm - Reply

    One of the things I find even more offensive than them evading tax is the fact that some of them get paid a fortune for doing jobs they actually love. Most of us get peanuts for doing dull, monotonous and endlessly repetitive jobs.

  6. george christoforou October 13, 2018 at 9:24 pm - Reply

    They are tax dodgers. Whether it can be proved that they have illegally evaded tax and be prosecuted is another matter.

  7. Dez October 15, 2018 at 8:47 pm - Reply

    I guess they have paid for tax advisors who have promoted/audited and advised their clients about these scams and all the advantages and exposures. The BBC may have led these well paid horses to the lucrative water but BBC will remain at arms length should they take a greedy drink from the trough. What I would be unhappy to see is these same greed driven so called stars claiming extra money from licence paid BBC funds reimbursing these same greedy individuals for their tax losses if they lose their cases. Disclosure of their names for shame would also be a punishment and also avoid them getting some meaningless honour tag later in their careers. Once again the usual sacrifice of the ritual little guys for public gratification and meanwhile the real mega rich Elite globalists slither back under their stones free from real national tax problems….. courtesy of generous political donations.

Leave A Comment