Tory tittle-tattler Perry LIBELS Jeremy Corbyn as an anti-Semite on national TV

Claire Perry: Even in the Commons, it seems she’s a loudmouth.

I hope he sues her out of every single possession she has.

Tory blowhard Claire Perry – who has amazingly managed to con the people of Devizes into making her their MP – appeared on the BBC’s Question Time yesterday evening (November 15) and said the following:

https://twitter.com/GraemeDemianyk/status/1063217597343297536

Jeremy Corbyn is not an anti-Semite.

But Ms Perry probably thought it was worth making the claim because Labour’s chief organising committees don’t need any evidence to find members guilty of anti-Semitism.

His party’s ruling National Executive Committee (of which, yes, he is a member) isn’t above falsely accusing innocent members of anti-Semitism, purely to score points with one or two members of the general public who make false claims, purely (in turn) in order to make Labour’s NEC do exactly as I’ve just described.

And his party’s National Constitutional Committee, which runs the disciplinary hearings at which these cases are heard, isn’t above ignoring the facts of these cases to find these false accusations true.

So Labour certainly has a perception problem when it comes to anti-Semitism. Both those organisations would rather trash the good names of innocent members than risk their party being slagged off as racist by a few liars.

Yet Claire Perry still called Jeremy Corbyn an anti-Semite.

And the NEC and NCC have brought themselves into disrepute with their false accusations and perversions of justice.

And the fact that they have done this means they have jeopardised any credibility a future Labour government might have as being able to deal with facts rather than fantasy.

So I’d like to ask the members of those organisations who came up with the boneheadedly imbecilic idea of pandering to a bunch of liars…

How’s that working out for you?

Afterthought: More shocking than Ms Perry’s libel is the fact that the BBC allowed it to be broadcast. As I understand it,Question Time isn’t recorded live – precisely in order to prevent legally-questionable material being broadcast, because every fresh publication of a libel is a new libel. In broadcasting her outburst, the BBC has made itself liable for legal action as well.

Visit our JustGiving page to help Vox Political’s Mike Sivier fight anti-Semitism libels in court


Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
(
but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:

Donate Button with Credit Cards

Here are four ways to be sure you’re among the first to know what’s going on.

1) Register with us by clicking on ‘Subscribe’ (in the left margin). You can then receive notifications of every new article that is posted here.

2) Follow VP on Twitter @VoxPolitical

3) Like the Facebook page at https://www.facebook.com/VoxPolitical/

Join the Vox Political Facebook page.

4) You could even make Vox Political your homepage at http://voxpoliticalonline.com

And do share with your family and friends – so they don’t miss out!

If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!

Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.


The Livingstone Presumption is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:

SWAHTprint SWAHTeBook

7 Comments

  1. kateuk November 16, 2018 at 11:00 am - Reply

    Isn’t it slander when it’s spoken and libel when it’s written? I saw the program and I was disgusted by what she said, that shouldn’t have been broadcast.

    • Mike Sivier November 17, 2018 at 10:49 am - Reply

      It’s also libel when broadcast on TV and radio.

      • kateuk November 22, 2018 at 5:14 pm - Reply

        Thank you for the clarification.

  2. Jenny Hambidge November 16, 2018 at 1:05 pm - Reply

    Why were so many people clapping? Its appalling.

  3. Joan Edington November 16, 2018 at 1:13 pm - Reply

    I couldn’t believe that it was let go. Someone in the audience ought to have pointed out that this venomous woman was not being protected by her accustomed parliamentary privilege and Corbyn should sue her for slander.

  4. Lynn Dye November 16, 2018 at 8:43 pm - Reply

    What made it even worse for me was that Dimbleby silenced the crowd so that she could repeat the slander again. Atrocious. Jeremy should sue/

  5. henry walsh November 21, 2018 at 7:29 pm - Reply

    IT is knowing that when you are losing the argument you diverse into profanities me thinks she protest to much.

Leave A Comment