Witch-hunters are THROUGH the bottom of the barrel with Jeremy Corbyn ‘book foreword’ claim

Jeremy Corbyn: No, he isn’t writing the foreword for another book. If he did, the anti-Semitism police would probably want to burn it.

It’s amazing, isn’t it? Just because Jeremy Corbyn wrote a new foreword for an old book that contains one sentence that might be interpreted as anti-Semitic, not only is that enough to condemn Mr Corbyn as anti-Semitic, but also the century-old text and its well-respected author.

Did I write “amazing”? I mean “utter lunacy“.

And hypocrisy, it seems.

Mr Corbyn wrote a foreword to a new edition of John Atkinson Hobson’s 1902 book Imperialism: A Study in 2011.

Academics and people who are sane consider the book to be a classic text which is still useful today, written by a man of his time. Hobson’s attitudes are acknowledged but are not considered to outweigh the usefulness of what he wrote.

I can certainly understand this. Back when I was at college, studying European literature, we looked at a text by August Strindberg – who was an appalling misogynist. This was acknowledged and formed part of our study of the text.

Were my course leaders misogynists for including this book on my course? Were those of us who were on the course – men and women alike – misogynists for studying it? No – that would be ridiculous.

We acknowledged it for what it is.

As, it seems, Mr Corbyn did in his words about Imperialism: A Study.

As, it seems, did Times journalist and former Tony Blair speech-writer Philip Collins, who was quick to share a link to a Times article condemning Mr Corbyn for writing a foreword to a renowned book, regardless.

Isn’t that a bit hypocritical?

Shadow Business Secretary Rebecca Long-Bailey, forced to comment on this storm-on-a-library-card to Sky News, rightly said Mr Corbyn was writing about the book as a whole, and was not supporting anti-Semitic statements.

This makes perfect sense, and for any blame to be attached to him, he would have had to single out an anti-Semitic comment for praise.

I haven’t read the foreword in question, but I would bet money that he didn’t.

Meanwhile the loonies are having their fun:

https://twitter.com/DrJBPhillips/status/1123557860166840320

He could leave it to Gordon Brown, who has also praised Hobson. I wonder how Jeff Phillips would feel about that?

Oh, but wait.

Isn’t there a big election today (May 2)?

Aren’t millions of people set to visit polling stations to vote in local government elections?

I think they are.

And isn’t it a little too convenient that another anti-Semitism smear against Jeremy Corbyn – even one as pathetic as this – should drop on the eve of such an event?

Some people certainly think so:

Oh, hey, if we’re finding reasons to censor books – A Study in Scarlet by Arthur Conan Doyle features derogatory references to Mormons. Should that book be deleted from cultural memory too? It’s the one that introduced the world to Sherlock Holmes, but that’s of no consequence, right?

Source: Jeremy Corbyn rejects antisemitism claim over book foreword | News | The Guardian


Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
(
but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:

Donate Button with Credit Cards

Here are four ways to be sure you’re among the first to know what’s going on.

1) Register with us by clicking on ‘Subscribe’ (in the left margin). You can then receive notifications of every new article that is posted here.

2) Follow VP on Twitter @VoxPolitical

3) Like the Facebook page at https://www.facebook.com/VoxPolitical/

Join the Vox Political Facebook page.

4) You could even make Vox Political your homepage at http://voxpoliticalonline.com

And do share with your family and friends – so they don’t miss out!

If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!

Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.


The Livingstone Presumption is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:

SWAHTprint SWAHTeBook

3 Comments

  1. WANDA LOZINSKA May 2, 2019 at 1:24 am - Reply

    Here’s some hypocracy:
    TIMES JOURNALIST CAUGHT OUT SHARING ‘OUTRAGE’ RE CORBYN’S FOREWORD – AFTER WRITING HIS OWN PRAISE OF HOBSON

    https://skwawkbox.org/2019/05/01/times-journalist-caught-sharing-outrage-re-corbyns-foreword-after-writing-his-own-praise-of-hobson/?fbclid=IwAR3xACWWhZxU9oFup8QiP5jOgm1X1DL5L4pn9Tv86NIhnGoKABqqUezUpGw

    • Mike Sivier May 2, 2019 at 11:36 am - Reply

      Yes, I mentioned this in the article.

  2. Neville May 2, 2019 at 11:52 am - Reply

    Corbyn wrote the forward in 2011. Where was the condemnation then? He was just a backbencher. Why discuss this now?

Leave A Comment