Riley libel case: Positive result from first day in court – but it’s not over!

I know judges don’t actually use gavels in UK courts. This is just a representative image.

The libel case against me finally arrived in court on October 25 – and the judge agreed with my approach.

Another judge had ordered a short directions hearing after Rachel Riley’s representatives had objected to a proposal for a TPI – trial of preliminary issues – a hearing on the meaning of the words I wrote that Ms Riley claims were libellous, and on whether they count as assertions of fact or simply opinions based on the evidence available.

At the hearing, after considering my representative’s submissions on case law, the judge ordered that the TPI would go ahead.

So we are back to facing the hearing we would have had earlier this month – going through the same process we proposed over the summer.

And there has been extra cost, of course.

So I have to appeal for you to keep the donations coming in. I have said all along that I think this case is a confrontation between my demand for justice and Ms Riley’s wealth – that she thinks she can buy the result she wants by forcing me to spend all the money available to me before the evidence can be heard.

If that is her strategy, it may well succeed. Bear in mind that some of the total raised on this page has already been spent, and more will go soon.

Follow the following instructions, if you would still like to help me win:

Email five of your friends, asking them to pledge to this CrowdJustice site. The address is https://www.crowdjustice.com/case/mike-sivier-libel-fight/

You could also post a link to Facebook, asking your friends to pledge.

If you’re on Twitter, you could tweet in support, quoting the address of the appeal.

If you use other social media platforms, please mention the campaign there, quoting the appeal address.

And if you can afford it, please consider pledging some cash yourself.

I have the arguments and I have the evidence. All I need is a chance to present them to a judge.

Have YOU donated to my crowdfunding appeal, raising funds to fight false libel claims by TV celebrities who should know better? These court cases cost a lot of money so every penny will help ensure that wealth doesn’t beat justice.

https://www.crowdjustice.com/case/mike-sivier-libel-fight/


Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
(
but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:

Donate Button with Credit Cards

Here are four ways to be sure you’re among the first to know what’s going on.

1) Register with us by clicking on ‘Subscribe’ (in the left margin). You can then receive notifications of every new article that is posted here.

2) Follow VP on Twitter @VoxPolitical

3) Like the Facebook page at https://www.facebook.com/VoxPolitical/

Join the Vox Political Facebook page.

4) You could even make Vox Political your homepage at http://voxpoliticalonline.com

And do share with your family and friends – so they don’t miss out!

If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!

Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.


The Livingstone Presumption is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:

SWAHTprint SWAHTeBook

7 thoughts on “Riley libel case: Positive result from first day in court – but it’s not over!

  1. G Millward

    Sounds to me as if the other side got their fingers burned. Like I said right at the beginning of all this, they picked the wrong one when they picked on you.

  2. Zippi

    The journey of 1,000 miles begins with one step and you’ve made it so, congratulations. Do you know how much you need?

    1. Mike Sivier Post author

      No. It depends on what happens next. The other side may give up after the preliminary hearing, depending on what is said there. Alternatively, they may take it to full trial, which may cost considerably more money. We shall see.

      I have a feeling this may be something of a “test case” in terms of crowdfunding to support court action.

      Thanks for the congratulations!

      1. Zippi

        We may have our disagreements, Mike, as is right and proper but what is happening to you is disgusting and I cannot stand idly by, because of a difference of opinion. I cannot abide injustice. I wish that I could have contributed more but I have been on the shelf for a wee. Money will be coming, again, soon so, who knows?

      2. Mike Sivier Post author

        That’s very kind. Thank you very much, along with everybody else who has kindly contributed.

  3. Kenneth Billis

    Hello Mike, you may already have seen it but in the last issue of Private Eye (No 1507), in what they call Commentatorballs (page 23) they include this quote by Rachel Riley on Radio 3

    “Popular science has come a long way. I think Brian Cox has done amazing things for astrology”

Comments are closed.