Serial nepotist Boris Johnson has apparently disgraced the Honours system by nominating an alleged wife-beater for a knighthood: his own father, Stanley.
Johnson has previously made his brother Jo a peer, and unsubstantiated reports have previously suggested he wanted to give honours to his wife Carrie and sister Rachel.
The nomination has triggered a backlash – not just against the nomination but against the whole system of giving titles to individuals who are favoured by people who happen to have been in government. For example:
🙄Of course he has 🤷♂️.
“Titles” of Sir, Lord, Lady, Baron, Baroness, Prince, Princess, King or Queen are all made up by entitled 😳people who originally stole property & land from YOU, the people, & still feel they should RULE you!https://t.co/q5iOSDslBF
— John Clarke (@JohnClarke1960) March 6, 2023
The allegations against Stanley Johnson are common knowledge…
So he gets to nominate a wife beater for a knighthood?
— Diana #FBPE #RejoinEU (@Diana38261174) March 6, 2023
… and the whole situation stinks of cronyism, as Wes Streeting (for once, rightly) asserted on BBC Breakfast:
In @RishiSunak Tory Britain
Boris Johnson nominates his dad
Stanley Johnson for a knighthood#LiarJohnson #ToryCorruption#ToriesOut241 #BorisJohnson pic.twitter.com/WOQmCnnhI0
— Jerry Hicks (@JerryHicksUnite) March 6, 2023
Stanley Johnson was also once accused of “inappropriate touching” against Tory MP Caroline Nokes, and against political journalist Ailbhe Rea, in another example of the privilege that high-powered members of the Establishment have over the rest of us; if he had been you or me, the claim would have been “sexual assault”.
What happened about that?
Nevertheless, brace yourself for Johnson Senior to receive the honour.
After all, they gave a knighthood to Tony Blair and an MBE to Rachel Riley.
Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
(but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:
Here are four ways to be sure you’re among the first to know what’s going on.
1) Register with us by clicking on ‘Subscribe’ (in the left margin). You can then receive notifications of every new article that is posted here.
2) Follow VP on Twitter @VoxPolitical
3) Like the Facebook page at https://www.facebook.com/VoxPolitical/
Join the Vox Political Facebook page.
4) You could even make Vox Political your homepage at http://voxpoliticalonline.com
And do share with your family and friends – so they don’t miss out!
If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!
Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.
The Livingstone Presumption is now available
in either print or eBook format here:
Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:
The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:
We should only grant honours those who perform outstanding gallantry and other worthwhile public services. Titles were only invented in order to keep serfs subjugated to their masters who in turn were subjugated to the Monarchy. Another form of slavery. We already have titles to identify each other Mister, Mrs. Miss. Master etc. Why do the English hanker pride in their deplorable age of Empire !!
Johnson and his father should be in the House of Dishonour not the House of :Lords. What has Stanley Johnson done for this country? Foisted his dishonest offspring upon us. For shame!
Ah, Was Streeting. If he ever gets a chance to ennoble his list will include the private health CEOs who will already have prospered well under a Labour government.
Have you noticed no mention of this on BBC News?
When it was briefly discussed on BBC TV, they added “If actually true” showing the possibly of giving Bojob an escape route.
All this fuss and bother makes me wonder what they are up to again, is this to dampen down Matt Hancock’s problems or are they hiding some other serious criminal behaviour or policies they don’t want scrutinised?