Supporters of the current government of Israel also support the murder of children.
No matter whether the Palestinian youth who was killed had committed any crime of his own – and there’s no proof shown here – he should have received medical attention but was instead shot and allowed to bleed to death.
This is just beyond anything…
The kid is just lying there, not a threat, & is then shot & killed at point blank range, an act that was then applauded by a crowd of racist zionist lunatics.
Meanwhile, settlers kill Palestinians, burn crops, steal homes & walk free! https://t.co/mgMv7uwkBB
If that is the culture of Israel, then Israel is barbaric.
Vox Political needs your help! If you want to support this site
(but don’t want to give your money to advertisers) you can make a one-off donation here:
Be among the first to know what’s going on! Here are the ways to manage it:
1) Register with us by clicking on ‘Subscribe’ (in the right margin). You can then receive notifications of every new article that is posted here.
5) Join the uPopulus group at https://upopulus.com/groups/vox-political/
6) Join the MeWe page at https://mewe.com/p-front/voxpolitical
7) Feel free to comment!
And do share with your family and friends – so they don’t miss out!
If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!
Muhammad Tamimi: his two-year-old life was ended after a member of the Israel Defence Forces raided his village and shot this defenceless toddler in the head.
Remember last week, when This Site commented on Jewish Chronicle reviewer Jonathan Sacerdoti’s critique of Maureen Lipman’s performance in the play Rose, in which he stated that it invests “dramatic capital in the outdated notion that Jews kill children”.
Outdated?
This happened last week:
Israeli soldiers shot a 2-year-old in the head!
Haytam Tamimi and his son Muhammad were among five Palestinians injured during a raid on the village of Nabi Saleh that lasted hours.
Israel claims they responded to being shot at in the Neveh Tzuf settlement. This is a lie pic.twitter.com/EjlPnqTsVP
I think it’s time we discussed some of these “notions” that certain people are constantly telling us are “outdated”.
Certainly the claim that armed Israelis shoot children is neither a notion, nor outdated. It is a terrifying fact.
Some have tried to justify the killing of a child by saying his parents put him in the line of fire. This is clearly false; the shooting happened during a raid on a Palestinian village by members of the Israel Defence Forces.
They claimed that they were responding to Palestinian aggression and I am not going to debate that. It might be true but that is irrelevant to what has happened, which is this:
Armed military aggressors attacked unarmed civilians in their homes and shot a toddler in the head, causing injuries from which he later died.
There is no explanation that can justify such an act.
It is unacceptable on any level at all – as all civilised observers must agree. Nobody can ever say they shot an unarmed toddler in the head as an act of self-defence.
And the very least the rest of us should expect is a little contrition from people like Mr Sacerdoti.
Vox Political needs your help! If you want to support this site
(but don’t want to give your money to advertisers) you can make a one-off donation here:
Be among the first to know what’s going on! Here are the ways to manage it:
1) Register with us by clicking on ‘Subscribe’ (in the right margin). You can then receive notifications of every new article that is posted here.
5) Join the uPopulus group at https://upopulus.com/groups/vox-political/
6) Join the MeWe page at https://mewe.com/p-front/voxpolitical
7) Feel free to comment!
And do share with your family and friends – so they don’t miss out!
If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!
Khan and can’t: Imran Ahmad Khan with Boris Johnson. The former committed a sex crime against a minor and, because the latter’s party couldn’t be bothered to record a complaint about him, he ended up on a Home Office panel advising the government on ways to stop the sexual exploitation of children. Think about that before voting Tory on May 5.
The Tories have said they did not know Imran Ahmad Khan had been accused of sexually assaulting an under-age boy – even though he had told their press office.
That’s the reason they’re using for giving him a position on a Home Office panel that advised the government about child sexual exploitation by grooming gangs, while his crime was being investigated by police.
Do you believe that?
Boris Johnson was cagey about the subject when he was challenged about it in Prime Minister’s Questions yesterday (April 27, 2022):
“I believe the Home Office has already made a statement about it,” he said.
Yes – as follows:
The Home Office was not aware of the allegations against him at the time and he no longer has any involvement with the department.”
This is very odd, because the MP’s victim told a court that he had made a complaint to the Conservatives’ press office days before Imran Ahmad Khan was elected as MP for Wakefield in November 2019.
The Tory Party line?
“We have found no record of this complaint.”
That could be because, as the victim stated to the court,
“I wasn’t taken very seriously.”
He said the woman he spoke to sounded “shocked” and passed him on to someone else who sounded more “stern” and asked if he had any “proof”.
“I said, ‘Yes, there’s a police report’ and she said, ‘Well …’, and that was it.
“I said, ‘I’m going to the police’, and she said, ‘Well, you do that’.”
It seems the Tories didn’t even bother making a record of the conversation and passing it on to the Whips’ office.
And it says much about the quality of Conservative MPs that Imran Ahmad Khan never bothered to mention that he was under investigation by the police and might not be an appropriate choice – or simply recused himself.
Considering the recent revelations that a Tory MP smeared Angela Rayner leading to the ‘Basic Instinct’ Mail story, that 56 MPs are accused of sexual misconduct including three Tory Cabinet ministers, and that a Tory frontbencher was caught watching pornography in the Commons chamber, we should not be surprised.
It seems the Conservative Parliamentary benches are full of sexual deviants.
And it seems they know they can get away with their perversions because nobody in their party ever takes complaints about them seriously. Am I right?
Have YOU donated to my crowdfunding appeal, raising funds to fight false libel claims by TV celebrities who should know better? These court cases cost a lot of money so every penny will help ensure that wealth doesn’t beat justice.
Vox Political needs your help! If you want to support this site
(but don’t want to give your money to advertisers) you can make a one-off donation here:
Here are four ways to be sure you’re among the first to know what’s going on.
1) Register with us by clicking on ‘Subscribe’ (in the left margin). You can then receive notifications of every new article that is posted here.
And do share with your family and friends – so they don’t miss out!
If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!
Former Tory PM Edward Heath with paedophile Jimmy Savile. Heath was not the only Tory prime minister to be connected with the disgraced broadcaster. All are now deceased and unable to pay for crimes that have been proven- in the case of Savile – or may be, as regards the others.
It seems staggering revelations are about to take place, when the findings of Operation Conifer are released on Thursday (October 5).
Yet we are constantly told there is no substance to allegations against top politicians – particularly top Conservatives.
What are we to make of this? Is it a conspiracy to cover up the facts, which would also be an abuse of authority, considering the fact that Conservative politicians have been heavily involved with these inquiries (and have been responsible for the loss of important information)? Or do the forthcoming revelations suggest the opposite?
The controversial report into paedophile allegations against Sir Edward Heath includes claims that he sexually assaulted boys as young as 11, it emerged.
Some of the most serious allegations, which include at least one rape and span his five decades as an MP, are linked to the sailing world. The former Prime Minister was a skilled yachtsman.
The report will say that seven of the allegations are sufficiently credible to justify questioning Sir Edward under caution were he alive today. One of the seven is said to involve the rape of an underage boy. Two were linked to his interest in sailing and allegedly occurred in Guernsey and Jersey.
The astonishing disclosures come just four days before the findings of Operation Conifer – a two-year, £1.5 million investigation into Sir Edward – are made public by Wiltshire Police Chief Constable Mike Veale.
Vox Political needs your help! If you want to support this site
(but don’t want to give your money to advertisers) you can make a one-off donation here:
Here are four ways to be sure you’re among the first to know what’s going on.
1) Register with us by clicking on ‘Subscribe’ (in the left margin). You can then receive notifications of every new article that is posted here.
And do share with your family and friends – so they don’t miss out!
If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!
By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. This includes scrolling or continued navigation. more information
The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.
