Tag Archives: Circle Holdings

The Hinchingbrooke Saga – in words and pictures!

150110NHAhinchingbrooke

This is the story of the disaster that befell users of an NHS hospital at Hinchingbrooke, after it was taken over by a private company called Circle Holdings. It is also the story of the wider privatisation of the English National Health Service, which is now falling apart at the seams as a result of this nightmarish, ideologically-imposed policy.

Hinchingbrooke Hospital was the Conservative-led Coalition Government’s flagship scheme to integrate private healthcare with the publicly-funded National Health Service. The contract was signed before Andrew Lansley (funded by Care UK, another private health firm) managed to get his Health and Social Care Act passed into law.

Circle Partnership was created in 2004 by merchant banker Ali Parsa and Massoud Fouladi “to exploit the newly created market in NHS care”. It seems likely that this was made possible by then-Prime Minister Tony Blair’s adherence to ‘Third Way’ politics, in which it was believed to be possible for the private sector to be able to contribute to public service provision. We know now that this is nonsense.

In 2011, Circle won its first major NHS contract from the Conservative-led Coalition Government – Hinchingbrooke Hospital. It beat that other bastion of private enterprise working in the service of the public – Serco. But was Circle helped along its way by the £1.4 million in donations it had made to the Conservative Party since its formation seven years previously?

Tories who benefited from a connection with Circle included: Henry Bellingham (former director of Lansdowne Advisory Ltd, which has shares in private healthcare company Circle),  Mark Simmonds (who was paid £50,000 a year as a “strategic adviser” to Circle Health), Richard Graham (received £3,000 from asset manager Crispin Odey, a major investor in Circle), Mark Harper (received £5,000 from Crispin Odey), Downing Street policy adviser Jo Johnson (received £6,000 from Crispin Odey), Jesse Norman (received £5,000 from Crispin Odey), and Nicholas Soames (received £2,000 from Crispin Odey) – that’s all in addition to the money given directly to the Conservative Party.

Here are some of the things said by Conservatives when the deal was signed:

150111SimonBurnsCircle

150111hinchingbrookeTories

Much was made of the decision by the right-wing press at the time – this Telegraph article and this Mail article provide amusing reading with hindsight.

Then it all fell apart – over a period of three years, which isn’t very long in terms of health provision. The problem, as revealed this week, can be summed up in this infographic, lampooning David Cameron’s infamous “We can’t go on like this; I’ll cut the deficit, not the NHS” poster of 2010:

150110circlehinchingbrookeArtistTaxiDriver

That’s right – Circle couldn’t make a profit out of Hinchingbrooke. The claim had been that it would bring stability to the hospital, which had amassed £40 million worth of debts at the time of the takeover. But the terms of the deal allowed Circle to withdraw if it had to put £5 million or more of its own money into keeping the hospital solvent. On Friday (January 9) it hit that limit, triggering the ‘break clause’ in its contract.

What’s most interesting about the announcement is its timing. Later that same day, the Care Quality Commission recommended that the Trust should be placed into special measures after it was rated ‘inadequate’ on the questions of whether it was caring, safe and well-led.

150110cqchinchingbrooke

According to Health Policy Insight, “This creates a problem for right-wing ideologues, who saw Hinchingbrooke as their proof of concept that the private sector is indefinably yet ineffably better. Circle’s statement blames the same, predictable-if-not-visible-from-space financial and demand pressures facing every other NHS provider. It also gets its retaliation in first on its CQC report: ‘We understand the CQC report will be published soon, and expect it to be both unbalanced and to disagree with many of its conclusions’.”

That statement, to the London Stock Exchange, blames funding cuts, a surge in demand for accident and emergency services and a failure to deliver “joined-up” reform between health and social services. It said the company had entered into discussions with the NHS Trust Development Authority “with the view to ensuring an orderly withdrawal from the current contract”.

In other words, this private sector company was admitting defeat and giving the hospital back to the public-sector NHS.

150110hinchingbrooke

Now comes the politicking. According to The Guardian: Labour’s Andy Burnham inherited the decision to call in the private sector at the troubled hospital when he became health secretary in June 2009 and was in office when a shortlist of three providers, including Circle, was drawn up in March 2010 on the eve of the general election. Circle was selected as the preferred bidder in November 2010 by the Coalition and awarded the contract a year later.

The current Health Secretary, Jeremy Hunt, was therefore wrong when he tweeted: “Disappointing news on Hinchingbrooke, but @andyburnhammp must stop playing politics – he signed off decision to allow private sector operator.”

He added in a tweet: “This [government] makes no apology for seeking solutions for failing hospitals. We won’t be deterred from tackling poor care & driving up standards.”

Driving up standards? What was the overall rating for Hinchingbrooke again? “Inadequate”. Hmm.

And more political embarrassment is likely to follow during the general election campaign in the local constituency, where a Tory MP faces a Labour challenger whose day job is as a paediatric consultant at Hinchingbrooke Hospital.

According to The Guardian (again): “Dr Nik Johnson, who faces a Tory incumbent with a 10,000-plus majority… [said] “Hospital departments are not there to make money. You are not going to make money out of an A&E or an obstetrics unit, and nor should you,” … adding that he would like to see an NHS provider manage Hinchingbrooke.

And that is where we are today. Hinchingbrooke stands as the latest chapter in an ongoing Tory NHS Crisis – but also, perhaps, as the most significant.

It represents the failure of Tory claims that profiteers could run NHS services as effectively as the state-run organisation. After all, what did Jeremy Hunt have to offer, on hearing the announcement of Circle’s decision?

Lies.

Hinchingbrooke failure means end of public tolerance for health privateers

150110hinchingbrooke

Campaigning group 38 Degrees’ response to the announcement that Circle Holdings is withdrawing from its contract to run Hinchingbrooke Hospital.

The failure of Circle Holdings’ management of Hinchingbrooke Hospital has one serious consequence for all political parties – but particularly Labour – and it is this: The British public will no longer tolerate any suggestion that private firms should participate in the National Health Service.

The reason Labour is singled out for special attention in this regard is that Labour has made the repeal of the Conservative Party’s Health and Social Care Act a key campaigning pledge (yes, it was passed in Coalition with the Liberal Democrats, but Andrew Lansley – Conservative – was the MP who spent around seven years working on the legislation in secret while his party leader promised all and sundry, with his ‘sincere’ face on, that the NHS was safe in Tory hands).

Unfortunately for Ed Miliband’s party, such promises are being met with scepticism by the people who should be Labour’s core voters. Only a couple of days ago, Vox Political posted this image to its Facebook page:

150110labourfourmonths

Here are some of the responses:

“Labour are just another neoliberal party serving the financial elite,” wrote Max Anstey. “The economic ideology ‘neoliberalism’ involves the privatisation of things. As Labour are neoliberal, they will not renationalise the NHS. A claim to ‘restore’ the NHS is not good enough from a neoliberal party. We need our public services back in our hands.”

Here’s another, by Gareth Jones: “I would love to see an honest resurgence of socialist ideals in this country. I’d love Labour to be Labour again. However, I just don’t see Ed Miliband being the one to bring it about. Ed is no Tony Benn.”

And Janet Kaiser added: “Labour (if it can still be called that) are going to do bugger-all. You can hope as much as you want, but the fact is the party has been taken over by venture capitalists and shouting the contrary is not going to change anything.”

That is the attitude Labour has to overcome. What’s sad is that it is an attitude that, in many ways, Labour has created. Only today, this blog posted a link to an article by Labour MP Michael Meacher in which he criticised his own front bench’s failure to attack the Conservatives over the economy – and much of what he said there can be applied to the NHS as well.

“Why doesn’t Labour hit out against the Tories where it could so easily secure some significant breakthroughs?” he asked. Why indeed.

The voters didn’t want private companies interfering in the NHS when they went to the polls in 2010. Now that they’ve experienced what it means – and don’t forget the Tory NHS crisis that is most clearly being seen in Accident & Emergency departments is also a symptom of this – they are vehemently against it.

Hinchingbrooke is a perfect opportunity for Labour to lay its cards on the table and promise that all of the expensive, bureaucratic and utterly pointless measures imposed by the Tories, to ensure that private firms get preferential treatment in the awarding of NHS contracts, will be removed – and to vow that the NHS will be restored as a state service providing the best care along with the best value for money.

And Labour stays quiet.

Follow me on Twitter: @MidWalesMike

Join the Vox Political Facebook page.

Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
(
but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:

Donate Button with Credit Cards

Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
asking the important questions.

Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:

SWAHTprint SWAHTeBook