Tag Archives: Justin Tomlinson

DWP admits abusing data protection laws to shred 50 reviews of benefit-related suicides

Not smiling: and Work and Pensions Secretary Therese Coffey really won’t be, once it gets through to her that the public now knows her department has been taking the p*ss out of all the people it has killed.

This is typical of the DWP: in the week that the minister for disabled people promises the department is working to improve its response to benefit-related deaths, we find it has been destroying records of them.

Particularly interesting for This Writer is the fact that they were records dated before 2015 – a period that I inquired about in a Freedom of Information request that the Department refused to honour.

I had to force the government to issue what turned out to be a tragically limited response, via an order from the Information Commissioner’s Office.

All of the above suggests that Linda Cooksey, sister of DWP victim Tim Salter (who took his own life after being deprived of benefits in 2013), was right to say the Department has been trying to “cover up” the facts.

It seems the DWP has feebly tried to excuse itself with a claim that the destruction was necessary due to data protection requirements.

But the Information Commissioner’s Office (again) has made it clear that there was no need to destroy any documents by a particular date, and in any case they could have been made subjects of a “public interest” protection.

It is interesting to hear that Stephen Timms, chair of the Commons Work and Pensions Committee, said there was a “lack of seriousness” about “putting things right when they go wrong”.

Perhaps that explains why Justin Tomlinson (the afore-mentioned minister for people with disabilities) was caught smirking during a debate about the DWP’s failure to address these issues.

So we see that the DWP minister was making fun of everybody who has suffered at the department’s hands, and the Department itself is laughing at anybody who seriously expects it to change its ways.

Source: ‘Cover-up’: DWP destroyed reports into people who killed themselves after benefits were stopped | The Independent

Have YOU donated to my crowdfunding appeal, raising funds to fight false libel claims by TV celebrities who should know better? These court cases cost a lot of money so every penny will help ensure that wealth doesn’t beat justice.

https://www.crowdjustice.com/case/mike-sivier-libel-fight/


Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
(
but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:

Donate Button with Credit Cards

Here are four ways to be sure you’re among the first to know what’s going on.

1) Register with us by clicking on ‘Subscribe’ (in the left margin). You can then receive notifications of every new article that is posted here.

2) Follow VP on Twitter @VoxPolitical

3) Like the Facebook page at https://www.facebook.com/VoxPolitical/

Join the Vox Political Facebook page.

4) You could even make Vox Political your homepage at http://voxpoliticalonline.com

And do share with your family and friends – so they don’t miss out!

If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!

Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.


The Livingstone Presumption is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:

SWAHTprint SWAHTeBook

Damning verdict on DWP: ‘British citizens are dying as a result of policies implemented by this government’

A bullying lawyer acting for the Tory government at the inquest of Errol Graham tried to claim that the man, who starved to death after the DWP cut off his benefits, had takeaway menus and cartons near him when he was found.

And why was the Tory minister for disabled people caught smirking when this case – and others – was discussed by MPs?

This is a man who starved to death after the Tory-run DWP cut off his benefits.

But the DWP’s lawyer, instead of admitting the government’s culpability in pushing a man to starvation, shouted at family members and at a police officer during the inquest into his death.

MPs in the House of Commons heard Debbie Abrahams say: “Errol’s daughter-in-law, Alison, has been scathing, telling me of the anger she and her husband Lee feel.

“She said that it was particularly shocking that the QC acting on behalf of the Government in the inquest tried to intimidate not just the family but others, shouting at the police officer who found Errol’s body about what else he had seen.

“In particular, they were deeply offended that the police officer was asked whether he had found any takeaway menus or cartons. It was clear at that inquest that the Government were far from being in listening mode or trying to learn from this.

“Rather, they were seeking to blame, which is absolutely unforgivable.”

It is.

Labour MP Lilian Greenwood said it was hard to believe Work and Pensions Secretary Therese Coffey’s claim that the DWP took this death “very seriously”.

She said the inquest took place eight months ago, when the coroner asked for robust policy and guidance for DWP staff to prevent future deaths, “yet the Department’s serious case panel is not even expected to consider the systemic issue identified in Errol’s case until next month”.

Ms Abrahams responded that “this has been going on for years now, and … nobody has responded. Systematic errors are coming out in repeated coroners’ reports and other reports, yet there is still no action”.

She recounted the cases of other people whose names will be familiar to readers of This Site – Jodey Whiting, Stephen Smith, Jimmy Ballentine, Mark Scholfield, David Clapson, Amy Nice, Kevin Dooley, Brian Bailey, Elaine Morrall, Daniella Obeng, Brian Sycamore, Chris Gold, Lawrence Bond, Julia Kelly, Ben McDonald, Chris Smith, Michael Connolly, Robert Barlow, David Barr, Shaun Pilkington and Terry McGarvey.

She made it clear that this was not an exhaustive list – and that many of those she had named had taken their own lives after receiving the DWP’s decision that their benefits were to be withdrawn.

And she said the Commons select committee on Work and Pensions had conducted an inquiry on sanctions policy which recommended: “DWP should seek to establish a body modelled on the Independent Police Complaints Commission, to conduct reviews, at the request of relatives, or automatically where no living relative remains, in all instances where an individual on an out-of-work working-age benefit dies whilst in receipt of that benefit.

“Such a model, operated within the purview of the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman, should ensure that the role of all publicly-funded agencies involved in the provision of services or benefits to the individual is scrutinised, so that a learning document can be produced setting out how policy, and the service delivery pathway, can be improved at every stage.”

It’s not a perfect recommendation as the point is that people were dying after receipt of their benefits was cut off.

Is this what made Justin Tomlinson, the minister for disabled people, smirk?

He denied finding any amusement in the recommendation – which had been rejected out-of-hand by the government. But what do you think?

Ms Abrahams pointed out that further information – made public by Freedom of Information requests – showed that ministers have been repeatedly warned by their own civil servants that their policies to assess people for out-of-work disability benefits were putting the lives of vulnerable claimants at risk.

But the National Audit Office found last month that the DWP does not have a robust record of all contact from coroners, meaning the actual number of people who have taken their lives as a result of government persecution is not known, and the 69 investigations of benefit-related suicides since 2015 represent only the “tip of the iceberg”.

Not only that, but DWP staff are not aware of guidance produced on these matters following safeguarding reviews – nor does this guidance reflect the full scope of issues that could trigger a review.

And system-wide issues that could have been identified by safeguarding reviews have been missed – because the DWP simply doesn’t bother to identify larger trends.

Mr Tomlinson, responding, said that in most cases “we get it right”.

This is not what the evidence shows. The vast majority of appeals against benefit denial are won by the claimant.

And he came out with a lot of flannel about reviews of processes being undertaken by the DWP.

Nothing is being done to change the system now.

Source: Social Security Benefits: Claimant Deaths – Hansard

Have YOU donated to my crowdfunding appeal, raising funds to fight false libel claims by TV celebrities who should know better? These court cases cost a lot of money so every penny will help ensure that wealth doesn’t beat justice.

https://www.crowdjustice.com/case/mike-sivier-libel-fight/


Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
(
but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:

Donate Button with Credit Cards

Here are four ways to be sure you’re among the first to know what’s going on.

1) Register with us by clicking on ‘Subscribe’ (in the left margin). You can then receive notifications of every new article that is posted here.

2) Follow VP on Twitter @VoxPolitical

3) Like the Facebook page at https://www.facebook.com/VoxPolitical/

Join the Vox Political Facebook page.

4) You could even make Vox Political your homepage at http://voxpoliticalonline.com

And do share with your family and friends – so they don’t miss out!

If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!

Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.


The Livingstone Presumption is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:

SWAHTprint SWAHTeBook

How the Tories used Motability to attack more than 100,000 disabled people

It was supposed to be an aid to help disabled people live normal, productive lives – but the trouble with giving people schemes like Motability is they can all-too-easily be taken away.

And that is what the Conservative government has been doing. The latest figure from the Motability Scheme itself shows that 102,000 people have lost their entitlement to a specially-adapted vehicle.

The method the Tories are using to take away this vital lifeline is simple: transfer their benefit claim from Disability Living Allowance to Personal Independence Payment.

And I’ve been reporting it for years.

You see, the Tories toughened the eligibility regime for disability benefit when they introduced PIP and used it to replace DLA.

In 2015, I reported that they were stripping Motability cars from 200 people every week.

So, for example, a teenager called Olivia – who lost a leg to cancer – was told she was not disabled enough for a Motability car. The DWP said she could keep it until a certain date – then reneged on the agreement, leaving her with days to raise £4,900 to buy the vehicle.

As I stated at the time, that’s a tall order for a girl who’s still at sixth form.

By 2016, 14,000 disabled people had lost their cars, based on figures provided to the BBC by Motability. But then-minister for disabled people Justin Tomlinson claimed he did not have that figure when asked a direct question in Parliament.

Was he misleading Parliament?

Later in 2016, his successor Penny Mordaunt misled Parliament on the effect of PIP on Motability users. She claimed that, compared to DLA, “more people are entitled to use the Motability scheme”.

In fact, of customers who had been reassessed for PIP, 44 per cent had lost their entitlement.

By 2018, 75,000 disabled people had been forced to return their Motability cars by an uncaring Tory government – although then-Work and Pensions secretary Esther McVey was caught misleading Parliament about it by Lord Stirling, who co-founded Motability in 1977.

And now the total is 102,000 – and likely to go higher still before reassessments for PIP are concluded in March this year.

The loss of the vehicles means the Tories have denied these people the ability to travel to work and access leisure and other independent living opportunities.

It means they are likely to be condemned to a life staring at the four walls of their home – until the Tories find an excuse to cut off whatever remaining benefits are left to them.

And you’ll spit when you find out the reason used to take away the ability of these people to travel anywhere.

It was a change in the rules that means you lose the higher mobility rate if you can walk further than 20m. Under DLA, it was 50m.

That’s right – think about it.

The Tories took from 102,000 people the ability to travel anywhere, because those people were able to walk up to 30m further than they allowed.

Source: More than 100,000 disabled people lose Motability vehicles when reassessed for PIP

Have YOU donated to my crowdfunding appeal, raising funds to fight false libel claims by TV celebrities who should know better? These court cases cost a lot of money so every penny will help ensure that wealth doesn’t beat justice.

https://www.crowdjustice.com/case/mike-sivier-libel-fight/


Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
(
but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:

Donate Button with Credit Cards

Here are four ways to be sure you’re among the first to know what’s going on.

1) Register with us by clicking on ‘Subscribe’ (in the left margin). You can then receive notifications of every new article that is posted here.

2) Follow VP on Twitter @VoxPolitical

3) Like the Facebook page at https://www.facebook.com/VoxPolitical/

Join the Vox Political Facebook page.

4) You could even make Vox Political your homepage at http://voxpoliticalonline.com

And do share with your family and friends – so they don’t miss out!

If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!

Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.


The Livingstone Presumption is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:

SWAHTprint SWAHTeBook

Benefit-related deaths: Why can the Tories provide SOME death counts but not others?

Government minister Justin Tomlinson raised more questions than he answered when he responded to questions on benefit-related deaths last week.

Labour MP Madeleine Moon asked how many claimants of the disability benefit Personal Independence Payment had died within six months of their claim being refused – under normal rules.

His reply: 10,380 between April 2013 and July 31, 2018.

Firstly, that’s 2,390 more than Ms Moon was told on February 1, when the government stated that 7,990 claimants had died between June 2013 and July 2018.

Did they all die during April and May 2013? That would be an appalling death count if so!

But it seems the toll may actually be worse.

You see, Ms Moon’s original request was for the total number of claimants who had died. Her request last week was only for those who died under normal rules – excluding those who had applied under special rules because they had a terminal condition.

So these figures relate to people who would not be expected to die because of their health condition.

The government’s caveat – “There is no evidence in this data to suggest someone’s reason for claiming PIP was the cause of their death and it would be misleading to suggest otherwise” – doesn’t get it out of possible responsibility for these deaths. We have no reason to believe that their reason for claiming PIP was the cause of their death. Therefore was must assume that something else was responsible – possibly related to the lack of money due to the government ignoring a justified benefit claim?

Ah, but the government never carries out that kind of research and always refuses permission for anybody else to do so. Doesn’t it?

Here’s the record.

But the plot thickens!

It seems that, while the Department for Work and Pensions was entirely capable of providing the statistics on PIP within its own cost limits, it is unable to do the same for deaths of people on Attendance Allowance, Employment Support Allowance or even Universal Credit.

Why not? What’s so special about these benefits that it would be too expensive to reveal the total number of deaths? Is it because that number is embarrassingly large?


Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
(
but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:

Donate Button with Credit Cards

Here are four ways to be sure you’re among the first to know what’s going on.

1) Register with us by clicking on ‘Subscribe’ (in the left margin). You can then receive notifications of every new article that is posted here.

2) Follow VP on Twitter @VoxPolitical

3) Like the Facebook page at https://www.facebook.com/VoxPolitical/

Join the Vox Political Facebook page.

4) You could even make Vox Political your homepage at http://voxpoliticalonline.com

And do share with your family and friends – so they don’t miss out!

If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!

Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.


The Livingstone Presumption is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:

SWAHTprint SWAHTeBook

UN poverty expert has an uphill struggle – with DWP ministers who don’t even understand their own rules

“Ignorant”: Justin Tomlinson.

The United Nations’ special rapporteur on poverty, Professor Philip Alston, has hit back at Conservative government ministers over their refusal to acknowledge his report on the consequences of their austerity policies in the UK.

But it seems he is on a hiding to nothing as at least one Conservative MP at the Department for Work and Pensions has revealed he does not even understand the way his party’s own rules work.

Ignorant Tories including the new Work and Pensions Secretary, Amber Rudd, have been lining up to say they “do not recognise” the validity of Professor Alston’s report, or to suggest its tone is “inappropriate”.

In response, he told The Guardian: “I think that dismissing a report that is full of statistics and first-hand testimony on the grounds that the minister didn’t appreciate the tone of the report rather misses the point.”

The report relied on undisputed statistics, such as the fact that 14 million people in the UK are living in poverty and local authorities have seen a 49 per cent real-terms reduction in funding from 2011 to 2018, and highlighted the disproportionate impact of austerity on children, the disabled and women.

It stated: “There are a number of steps that could be taken simply through instructions provided by the minister to DWP that would make the system much more humane.”

It seems that his faith in Tory ministers to take the right actions has been misplaced – if the behaviour of family support, housing and child maintenance minister Justin Tomlinson is any yardstick.

Mr Tomlinson told members of the Commons Work and Pensions committee, of which he is a member, that families could cope with the poverty created by the Tory benefit cap that limits their income to £20,000 a year – by taking in a lodger.

There’s only one problem: Anybody in a council house or housing association property who takes in a lodger would be breaking the rules of their tenancy and may be evicted.

And most private landlords ban tenants from taking in a lodger, either because of mortgage restrictions or extra legal burdens on the landlord.

Most telling is the fact that this Tory is putting tenants in a vulnerable position, simply to cover a shortfall in rent created by his government.

Professor Alston ended his critique of the government by saying, “I’m hoping that actions will speak louder than words.”

Considering Mr Tomlinson’s words, that may be a forlorn hope.

Visit our JustGiving page to help Vox Political’s Mike Sivier fight anti-Semitism libels in court


Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
(
but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:

Donate Button with Credit Cards

Here are four ways to be sure you’re among the first to know what’s going on.

1) Register with us by clicking on ‘Subscribe’ (in the left margin). You can then receive notifications of every new article that is posted here.

2) Follow VP on Twitter @VoxPolitical

3) Like the Facebook page at https://www.facebook.com/VoxPolitical/

Join the Vox Political Facebook page.

4) You could even make Vox Political your homepage at http://voxpoliticalonline.com

And do share with your family and friends – so they don’t miss out!

If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!

Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.


The Livingstone Presumption is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:

SWAHTprint SWAHTeBook