The answer’s simple, but will our pensioners work it out?
With both Labour and the Tories refusing to guarantee the continuation of the triple-lock, there is no reason for the worst-paid pensioners in Europe – ours, here in the UK – to give either party their vote.
Jeremy Hunt refuses to guarantee the pensions triple lock will be in next Tory manifesto.
The same as Labour.
UK present/future retirees condemned to one of the lowest state pensions in Europe.
Find another party to support! Your life depends on it.
Vox Political needs your help! If you want to support this site
(but don’t want to give your money to advertisers) you can make a one-off donation here:
Be among the first to know what’s going on! Here are the ways to manage it:
1) Register with us by clicking on ‘Subscribe’ (in the right margin). You can then receive notifications of every new article that is posted here.
5) Join the uPopulus group at https://upopulus.com/groups/vox-political/
6) Join the MeWe page at https://mewe.com/p-front/voxpolitical
7) Feel free to comment!
And do share with your family and friends – so they don’t miss out!
If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!
16-year-olds have been voting in polls in Scotland and Wales for a few years now, with no apparent societal degeneration.
This Writer tends to believe the Tories are worried that younger people, given the vote, will use it to keep Labour in power. But that’s based on an out-of-date understanding of Labour’s position on the political map.
When Labour was left-wing, and had policies that would have given people starting out in life a better chance for success, then 16- and 17-year-olds might have voted for that party. They would certainly have come out very strongly in support of Jeremy Corbyn’s version of that party.
But Keir Starmer has systematically ditched all of Mr Corbyn’s left-wing policies, turning a once-democratic Socialist party into a mirror-image of the Conservatives.
Teenagers – at least, those with any political nous at all – are therefore far more likely to cast around for other political organisations to support.
If the Tories have anything genuine to fear, it is that impressionable teens – those who don’t have any political savvy – will be fooled by a slogan into voting unexpectedly.
But wouldn’t that be poetic justice for the Tories, who have spent decades trying to train us to support three-word slogans rather than thinking for ourselves?
Vox Political needs your help! If you want to support this site
(but don’t want to give your money to advertisers) you can make a one-off donation here:
Be among the first to know what’s going on! Here are the ways to manage it:
1) Register with us by clicking on ‘Subscribe’ (in the right margin). You can then receive notifications of every new article that is posted here.
5) Join the uPopulus group at https://upopulus.com/groups/vox-political/
6) Join the MeWe page at https://mewe.com/p-front/voxpolitical
7) Feel free to comment!
And do share with your family and friends – so they don’t miss out!
If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!
Yes, I’ve made a video out of the article from last week. There are good reasons for this.
Firstly, it contains excellent advice on how to vote properly. It seems people are confused about the fact that they are expected to vote for whoever has policies they think will be of benefit to the UK as a whole – not for the party they consider to be tribally theirs, even though that organisation hasn’t actually helped them in decades, and not for the party they think is best-placed to keep out another party they don’t like.
Secondly, it contains excellent reasoning on why not to vote for Keir Starmer.
Thirdly, it provides an opportunity for you all to visit the original article, which has not received anything like enough attention. It’s at https://wp.me/p4Sru1-hyZ
Watch and enjoy:
Vox Political needs your help! If you want to support this site
(but don’t want to give your money to advertisers) you can make a one-off donation here:
Be among the first to know what’s going on! Here are the ways to manage it:
1) Register with us by clicking on ‘Subscribe’ (in the right margin). You can then receive notifications of every new article that is posted here.
5) Join the uPopulus group at https://upopulus.com/groups/vox-political/
6) Join the MeWe page at https://mewe.com/p-front/voxpolitical
7) Feel free to comment!
And do share with your family and friends – so they don’t miss out!
If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!
Clement Attlee innovated. Keir Starmer will privatise
Keir Starmer: We can’t win power by spending. We need to reform and create wealth. Tory austerity hasn't secured growth. Why persist? Real average wage same as in 2005. No trickle-down. Economy won't grow without state investment. Neoliberalism has failed.https://t.co/0ilDRNf3dL
That was one politician’s response to Keir Starmer’s interview in The Observer today (Sunday, July 16, 2023).
In it, Starmer contradicts himself by saying he won’t promise to spend any more money but will prioritise economic growth and wealth creation; these cannot be achieved without investment – and indeed, investment is mentioned later in the article.
He also says he intends to impose “radical reform of public services” – by which we may infer that he means more privatisation, despite the fact that the state of the privatised water and energy firms shows it is a disaster for service provision.
We can see evidence that he supports privatisation in an interview with Starmer’s political idol, Tony Blair, on Sophy Ridge’s Sky News show this morning:
The correct response to that is to point out that public sector innovation should come from the people in charge – who are politicians. Blair was in charge of the public sector between 1997 and 2007; if he didn’t bother to innovate, preferring instead to dick around with PFI and “Third Way” nonsense, that was his mistake.
And it will be what loses Starmer his election, if he follows the same road at a time when we can all understand perfectly well that we are being ripped off by the water and energy firms.
The social media responses have gone directly to the point:
Vapid, meaningless twaddle
Investment is needed desperately in cash-starved public services and infrastructure
— Kerry-Anne Mendoza 🏳️🌈 (@TheMendozaWoman) July 16, 2023
So he's a fiscal conservative and a social conservative, but we're not supposed to call him 'a Conservative', because he's the 'opposition' to the Conservatives. I think our politics may be broken.https://t.co/BvdDAxFCcM
What is really depressing about Starmer’s article and interviews today is that he has confirmed he is a full on Thatcherite. He has even gone so far as to say there is no alternative. I despair.
Sir Keir Starmer KC has just confirmed that Labour will keep the two-child policy.
UK set for a massive depopulation crisis. Without the help of immigrants or an improved birth rate to solve that crisis, we face an unsolvable social care crisis in future years.
After Independent candidate wins council by-election, call goes out to support Independents in this week’s Parliamentary polls
Agree with every word of this. We can defeat the Tories & Tory-lite New Labour by voting for independent candidates. It’s the only possible route for real chahge. Labour are under the control of a right wing faction who care more about their own personal power than anything else! https://t.co/jR4pVkTAcB
Expect to see more support for Independent candidates as the week progresses.
As the UK braces for more pollution-induced soaring temperatures, here comes a Bill to stop politicians benefiting from oil and gas profits
Europe is set to record its hottest-ever temperature – beating the 2021 record.
Fossil fuel firms have brought us to the brink of climate disaster.
On Tuesday, I'll present a Parliamentary bill to ban MPs from receiving any financial or other benefits from oil & gas companies. pic.twitter.com/XmYAvsHziJ
Step 1. Only test at places that you control & that you have "designated" as bathing water. Anywhere not designated is not tested, could be highly toxic even if people swim there, doesn't matter, no designation, no testing, no problem. 100% record. (3/7)https://t.co/cSlA3qjB45
Yes I did say that. Even on days that water quality is tested the @EnvAgency dumps the worst 15% of test results and don't use them in the final count. Cheating? 100% record. (5/7) pic.twitter.com/OjYj3SFEn7
Vox Political needs your help! If you want to support this site
(but don’t want to give your money to advertisers) you can make a one-off donation here:
Be among the first to know what’s going on! Here are the ways to manage it:
1) Register with us by clicking on ‘Subscribe’ (in the right margin). You can then receive notifications of every new article that is posted here.
5) Join the uPopulus group at https://upopulus.com/groups/vox-political/
6) Join the MeWe page at https://mewe.com/p-front/voxpolitical
7) Feel free to comment!
And do share with your family and friends – so they don’t miss out!
If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!
It’s a valid criticism. The truth of it is partially in the quality of the people Keir Starmer is attracting, after his changes (This Writer can’t call them reforms):
This really ought to be waving a big, red flag at us – this Tory is comfortable in Starmer's party. Starmer has turned it into a party that is indistinguishable from the Conservatives, such that this kind of floor-crossing is possible. It's really just one big party. https://t.co/kjL8vaHKZf
— Stats for Lefties 🏳️⚧️ (@LeftieStats) July 8, 2023
In other words, Labour would follow Tory policy until such time as the economy improves (and you can bet that the economy won’t improve enough for Keir Starmer to introduce any socialist ideas, or indeed any measures that would improve the lot of the “ordinary working people” he claims to represent.
Think about what Labour has already said it will not do:
Things Labour have RULED OUT doing in power:
Fighting climate crisis Controlling rents Capping energy & food prices Nationalising water to stop private companies profiteering and polluting Increasing benefits to the poorest Increasing taxes on the wealthy
They’re Tories
— Kerry-Anne Mendoza 🏳️🌈 (@TheMendozaWoman) July 11, 2023
Add to this the fact that Labour won’t build more houses:
"If you become chancellor, will you spend tax payers money building houses?"
This is while 1.2 million people are waiting for social housing.
Then again, Labour will continue the privatisation of the National Health Service in England, even though 7.4 million people are waiting for NHS treatment as a result of this progressive mismanagement.
Keir Starmer himself seems to believe he is above the concerns of the people he reckons should be voting for him.
We saw him, last week, shutting up young environmental activists who tried to speak out during his policy announcement on how Labour wanted young people to be able to express themselves in speech. And he lied to them; after promising to meet them after his own speech, Starmer ran away.
Is it because he hates “tree huggers”?
Genuinely intrigued how reactionary this man becomes as PM.
I quite like people who enjoy nature, it’s something which transcends left and right. And I don’t really trust people who don’t. pic.twitter.com/MEPxFW08Mu
The economist Richard Murphy has highlighted that Starmer’s “tree huggers” comment indicates not only that he isn’t interested in new economic and policy thinking about the issues the UK faces as a country, but that he and the rest of the Shadow Cabinet are far more right-wing than Ed Miliband – and Ed (bless ‘im) is himself hardly the socialist his dad was.
Reeves and Starmer: maintainers of the status quo https://t.co/TThCAyHG7z How did Labour come to be led by two people so profoundly conservative, as Reeves and Starmer so very obviously are on any issue you can think of?
This is the attitude of a prospective Labour Chancellor who questions whether we can afford to save the planet because it is instead better to crush the well-being of millions with unnecessary interest rate rises.
Reeves says she and Starmer are as one on issues. I suspect that for now that is true. It is deeply dangerous that such a reactionary pair are in that position and are described as the Opposition when it is so apparent that their goal is perpetuation of the status quo.
Link that with the words of Ian Hodson, below:
Democracy is not the option of voting for different parties that offer the same solutions. Democracy is the ability to vote for an alternative to the policy’s that created the crisis.
Look at its attitude to the scandal of Boris Johnson’s resignation honours list: where once Labour had planned to get rid of the House of Lords altogether, it has shelved the idea – and in any case would want to keep the honours system and the possibility of gifting a place in the second House of Parliament to its… cronies.
It is clear that Keir Starmer’s (and Rachel Reeves’s, and even Ed Miliband’s) party will not be representative of the people of the UK and will not give us the change we desperately need – in fact it will deliberately frustrate any such aim.
It can do this because of the current “First Past The Post” electoral system that ensures each of the two largest parties in Parliament have “safe seats” that they can expect to win at every election. Knowing that, cronyism ensures that these seats go to those who most strongly support the right-wing views of the leaders – never mind what they’re saying to the voters. They don’t have to listen to us.
And that’s why the UK is regressing; our so-called leaders aren’t interested in building a dynamic, go-ahead nation with a restored economy – they just want to ride us all into ruin and then take what they can for themselves.
The answer is clear to those of us who can see it. We need to change the voting system to root out the rot.
Don’t vote Labour at the next election. And don’t vote Tory either.
Vote for candidates who support proportional representation.
Vote for independents who understand the needs of your constituency.
And make sure everyone you know does the same. Starmer’s treachery means it is your only hope.
Vox Political needs your help! If you want to support this site
(but don’t want to give your money to advertisers) you can make a one-off donation here:
Be among the first to know what’s going on! Here are the ways to manage it:
1) Register with us by clicking on ‘Subscribe’ (in the right margin). You can then receive notifications of every new article that is posted here.
5) Join the uPopulus group at https://upopulus.com/groups/vox-political/
6) Join the MeWe page at https://mewe.com/p-front/voxpolitical
7) Feel free to comment!
And do share with your family and friends – so they don’t miss out!
If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!
Johnson’s attitude: satirists created this image in 2021 – and now we find that it was more or less accurate. The video of a lockdown-busting party demonstrates the first two elements, and the responses of Tories to criticism of it demonstrates the third. The people are incandescent with fury at this high-handed ‘one rule for you, another for us’ attitude, and are baying for Boris Johnson’s blood.
Another pal of Boris Johnson has been identified in the lockdown-busting party video that became public knowledge over the weekend:
— Jack White 🔶#SlavaUkraini #FBPE #REJOINNow #NAFO (@WriterJackWhite) June 17, 2023
She joins other identified Tories including Shaun Bailey (made a peer in Johnson’s honours) and Ben Mallet (given an OBE in Johnson’s honours). Bailey has tried to dismiss the matter out-of-hand – indicating that this entitled Tory twit doesn’t understand that he has absolutely no control over the news agenda and if the public is outraged, he’ll have to put up with it:
Elsewhere, questions have arisen over another video clip, in which Jacob Rees-Mogg (knighted in Johnson’s honours list) said a Christmas party that broke Covid-19 lockdown rules would not be investigated by police. Why was he so sure?
I'm just trying to think this one through. For Rees-Mogg to be confident enough to be making these jokes, he must have known that there was some kind of consensus in these circles that in their view the Lockdown was wrong or pointless. Have I got that right? https://t.co/1lJ1GmzwbL
— Michael Rosen 💙💙🎓🎓 (@MichaelRosenYes) June 18, 2023
Rees-Mogg has apparently claimed “officials” told him to say the rules had been followed at all times.
— Sir Norman of Nowhere, KBE, CSE.🏴☠️ (@Normanjam671) June 17, 2023
It’s not looking good, is it?
There are other problems with Johnson’s honours list…
Could Johnson write a column on why junior aide Charlotte Owens deserves a peerage more than the chief medical officer, chief scientist, creator of the vaccine, or any number of doctors, nurses or physios who put themselves in harm’s way to save patients? https://t.co/pBomf0tnWW
— The London Economic (@LondonEconomic) June 19, 2023
Calls for Johnson’s honours list to be rejected in toto have proliferated, but spineless prime minister Rishi Sunak has run away from the responsibility for dealing with this controversy dumped on his doorstep by his forerunner.
Sunak has also run like a rabbit from the responsibility of making his position clear on how his Tory MPs should vote on the recommendation of the Partygate Inquiry.
Sky News reporter, "You promised professionalism, accountability, integrity at every level. Boris Johnson has undermined all of those. Do you not need to set an example and vote for him to be punished for that?"
— Fionna O'Leary, 🕯🇪🇺 (@fascinatorfun) June 17, 2023
Yes indeed.
What happened to all that PPE that Michelle Mone got the Tory government to buy, only to find it couldn’t be used?
Vox Political needs your help! If you want to support this site
(but don’t want to give your money to advertisers) you can make a one-off donation here:
Be among the first to know what’s going on! Here are the ways to manage it:
1) Register with us by clicking on ‘Subscribe’ (in the right margin). You can then receive notifications of every new article that is posted here.
5) Join the uPopulus group at https://upopulus.com/groups/vox-political/
6) Join the MeWe page at https://mewe.com/p-front/voxpolitical
7) Feel free to comment!
And do share with your family and friends – so they don’t miss out!
If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!
Not so much fun now, is it? Whether or not this image means what the Partygate Inquiry concluded, it has helped pitch Boris Johnson out of Parliament. Will their reaction to that inquiry have the same effect on large numbers of Conservative MPs?
The measure of an MP is in how they respond when faced with difficult decisions.
By that standard, it seems most of the current crop of Tories are worse than useless.
It seems a significant number of them will not be willing either to support or oppose the findings and recommendation of the Partygate Inquiry’s report on Boris Johnson – for fear of upsetting various sections of their voter base.
The rationalisations are ridiculous.
Apparently, some are afraid that Johnson’s supporters will turn away from them if they support the report’s findings. But the report itself is extremely thorough and answers any criticisms of its methodology, meaning that its conclusions are as safe as they could possibly be. Anybody who still thinks that Boris Johnson is a pillar of integrity should therefore be considered wrong.
The job of an MP faced with voters who insist that Johnson has been mistreated is to explain that the inquiry was carried out to an extremely high standard and arguments against its findings are just wishful thinking.
And how do these MPs know what the majority of their voters are thinking, anyway? It isn’t even 24 hours since the report was published. Anything said by members of the public before that is now irrelevant; we have all seen opinion polls showing how the mood of voters fluctuates over time – and that they are especially shaped by major events.
Some MPs are upset at what they consider the harshness of the proposed punishments against Mr Johnson. But anyone who reads it will see that he brought these punishments on himself. Originally the sanction was to be a 10-day suspension from Parliament. This was extended to 80 days because of the extremely strong – and public – response that he made after he had received advance notice of the report’s findings. This was itself a serious contempt of Parliament.
Considering the facts of the matter, one is led toward the conclusion that these MPs are not so much concerned about what other people think of Johnson and the report’s findings – they simply don’t want to be part of any final decision on it.
Cowards, one and all. And that seems to include their second-choice prime minister, Rishi Sunak, who “hasn’t yet had time to fully consider the report”, according to the BBC, and has thus managed to avoid commenting on it.
This Writer is heartened to read in that same article the belief of Tory MP Tim Loughton – one of the few who have dared to put their heads over the parapet – that the result’s recommendations will “go through very easily next week”.
We’ll see.
And with a general election looming ever-nearer, the choices these Tories make will be sure to affect not just Boris Johnson’s political future, but their own.
Vox Political needs your help! If you want to support this site
(but don’t want to give your money to advertisers) you can make a one-off donation here:
Be among the first to know what’s going on! Here are the ways to manage it:
1) Register with us by clicking on ‘Subscribe’ (in the right margin). You can then receive notifications of every new article that is posted here.
5) Join the uPopulus group at https://upopulus.com/groups/vox-political/
6) Join the MeWe page at https://mewe.com/p-front/voxpolitical
7) Feel free to comment!
And do share with your family and friends – so they don’t miss out!
If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!
The Tories introduced voter ID at polling stations and the electorate in the local elections turned away from them en masse; they lost 1,063 seats in the greatest local election defeat any UK political party has suffered.
What conclusion did they draw from this? Well…
ID checks to be introduced on Postal votes without Parliamentary scrutiny, as the Tory Government use a rarely-used statutory instrument to change the rules, & sneak the announcement out in a written statement… https://t.co/7BxDekL7IU
It’s possible that the Tories tried to gerrymander postal votes at May’s election, by persuading voters to send their ballot papers to their local Conservative association instead of their local council.
Bringing postal and proxy votes in line with “in person” votes makes sense if such an attempt at gerrymandering failed.
I make this point because in other ways it makes no sense for the Tories to do this at all. For instance:
Newly announced government rules to require identity checks for postal and proxy voting in UK parliamentary elections are likely to make it harder for older people to take part in elections, a leading charity has warned.
Age UK said… [it would] “erect additional barriers to older people exercising their democratic right to vote.
“Rather than strengthening our democracy our worry is that it will weaken it, if some older people with postal votes find it too hard to submit their ID, or to re-register every three years, and simply give up.”
It strikes This Writer as a strange way to treat a segment of the population that has previously been – mostly – supportive of the Conservative Party at recent elections.
Making it harder for pensioners to vote means another group will find it harder to vote Conservative.
One fails to see the logic in it. Considering the need for voter ID was fabricated (there aren’t enough fraudulent attempts to vote to justify it), the logical choice would have been to roll back voter ID altogether.
But then, maybe these Tories have a political death wish.
Vox Political needs your help! If you want to support this site
(but don’t want to give your money to advertisers) you can make a one-off donation here:
Be among the first to know what’s going on! Here are the ways to manage it:
1) Register with us by clicking on ‘Subscribe’ (in the right margin). You can then receive notifications of every new article that is posted here.
5) Join the uPopulus group at https://upopulus.com/groups/vox-political/
6) Join the MeWe page at https://mewe.com/p-front/voxpolitical
7) Feel free to comment!
And do share with your family and friends – so they don’t miss out!
If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!
“The selections for Labour Party candidates needs [sic] to be more democratic and we should end NEC impositions of candidates. Local Party members should select their candidates for every election.”
Well, Islington North Constituency Labour Party has done just that – passing a motion of support for MP Jeremy Corbyn and expressing the desire that he should be their candidate in the next general election.
There’s a problem with that: Keir Starmer’s NEC has ruled that Mr Corbyn may no longer stand for election as a Labour Party candidate. He demanded this NEC imposition in spite of his own words from 2020 that you see at the top of this article.
Responses from those of us who keep an eye on the retreat of democracy in the Labour Party have drawn the logical conclusions:
Indeed. Starmer won’t respect the wishes of Labour Party members and is likely to impose his own preferred candidate (some are already suggesting that Sam Tarry has been chosen). Also…
Suspension (for some spurious reason) of the members that voted in… 3 … 2 … 1
… it does seem likely that Starmer will take revenge on the constituency delegates who voted against his orders.
No doubt we shall see what he does soon enough.
Vox Political needs your help! If you want to support this site
(but don’t want to give your money to advertisers) you can make a one-off donation here:
Be among the first to know what’s going on! Here are the ways to manage it:
1) Register with us by clicking on ‘Subscribe’ (in the right margin). You can then receive notifications of every new article that is posted here.
5) Join the uPopulus group at https://upopulus.com/groups/vox-political/
6) Join the MeWe page at https://mewe.com/p-front/voxpolitical
7) Feel free to comment!
And do share with your family and friends – so they don’t miss out!
If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!
Shifty: Jacob Rees-Mogg has admitted ‘voter ID’ was vote-rigging – and failed. He should be punished – but some media outlets would rather misdirect you to something that hasn’t happened, and perhaps never will.
Don’t you find it strange that an alleged newspaper like the Daily Mail would drag readers’ attention – for two days’ running – to a rubbish Labour Party idea to give the vote to visitors from the EU…
The Daily Mail splashes for the second day in a row on a non-existent Labour plan to "rig" elections, while ignoring the actual plan to rig elections just publicly admitted to by Jacob Rees-Mogg. https://t.co/Uswrmgkg8Npic.twitter.com/DhHuXmp04X
… when a former Conservative minister has admitted that the Tory “voter ID” scheme was a genuine attempt to rig the vote.
Speaking at the National Conservatives’ conference (it makes perfect sense that he would be a Nat-C), Jacob Rees-Mogg said:
“Parties that try and gerrymander end up finding their clever scheme comes back to bite them, as dare I say we found by insisting on voter ID for elections.”
The local government elections in England earlier this month were the first at which people were required to bring photographic identification in order to cast a vote – and the electorate punished the Conservatives by taking 1,063 council seats away from them.
The admission is even more serious for Rees-Mogg because he argued in favour of “voter ID” in Parliament:
So not only did @Jacob_Rees_Mogg vote for a measure that he knew was gerrymandering, he actually argued for it in Parliament when he knew it would disenfranchise voters:
"It is only reasonable to ask people to turn up with their photographic identification".
He must have known then that it was an attempt to gerrymander votes in the Conservatives’ favour – to rig elections. Mustn’t he?
Indeed, Labour’s Dawn Butler has said Rees-Mogg’s admission should be reported to the Parliamentary Standards Authority – or even to the police. The Electoral Commission is another option – although its current status as an arm of the Tory government makes it a poor third choice.
Yet the hard-right headbangers of the Daily Heil want you to concentrate on an idea mooted about by the Labour Party, that is unlikely ever to come to pass.
In light of the fact that election-rigging is a crime, I’ll leave it to you to work out why they might want to do that.
Vox Political needs your help! If you want to support this site
(but don’t want to give your money to advertisers) you can make a one-off donation here:
Be among the first to know what’s going on! Here are the ways to manage it:
1) Register with us by clicking on ‘Subscribe’ (in the right margin). You can then receive notifications of every new article that is posted here.
5) Join the uPopulus group at https://upopulus.com/groups/vox-political/
6) Join the MeWe page at https://mewe.com/p-front/voxpolitical
7) Feel free to comment!
And do share with your family and friends – so they don’t miss out!
If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!
By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. This includes scrolling or continued navigation. more information
The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.
