You don’t eliminate child poverty by redefining it, Mr Osborne

Last Updated: November 25, 2015By

130617childpoverty
George Osborne has claimed child poverty has been reduced. It has not.

The way child poverty is currently measured means a child is considered to be in poverty if his or her family earns 60 per cent or less of average family income.

But average family income has fallen since the Conservatives took office in 2010.

So – without becoming wealthier – fewer families are now considered to be in poverty.

Not only that, but Gentleman Ranker Iain Duncan Smith is planning to change the way the UK measures child poverty, in order to claim that even fewer families are in poverty.

Meanwhile, increasing numbers of these children will be starving; their parents attending food banks or hospitals with malnutrition – an issue that is already being reported by the news media.

Join the Vox Political Facebook page.

If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!

Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
(
but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:

Donate Button with Credit Cards

Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.

Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:

SWAHTprint SWAHTeBook

2 Comments

  1. mili68 November 25, 2015 at 1:36 pm - Reply

    Tweeted @melissacade68

  2. Robert Fillies November 25, 2015 at 4:49 pm - Reply

    Shame on the whole Government, but they won’t care.

Leave A Comment