Why has Jeremy Hunt turned the NHS into a profit-creation scheme for private companies?
The claim then was that the information would be used for medical research and screening for common diseases – as is the claim now. Also, that patients could opt out of their data being used. How many of them know that?
The spokesman for the Royal Free said the arrangement with DeepMind is the standard NHS information-sharing agreement set out by NHS England’s corporate information governance department, the same as the other 1,500 agreements with third-party organisations that process NHS patient data, and that’s all very well. How long has this “standard” agreement been running? Since 2014?
If so, then the Department of Health has ignored the wishes of patients across the UK who did not want the government to sell any patient information to private companies.
We simply don’t know what they will do with it.
Are patients starting to receive calls from insurance companies, for example?
The article quotes Sam Smith, of the health data privacy group MedConfidential, who told the New Scientist: “This is not just about kidney function. They’re getting the full data.
“What DeepMind is trying to do is build a generic algorithm that can do this for anything – anything you can do a test for. The big question is why they want it. This is a very rich data set. If you are someone who went to the A&E department, why is your data in this?”
Exactly. The Department of Health has serious questions to answer. The National Health Service is not a profit-creating system for private companies.
A company owned by Google has been given access to the healthcare data of up to 1.6 million patients from three hospitals run by a major London NHS trust.
DeepMind, the tech giant’s London-based company most famous for its innovative use of artificial intelligence, is being provided with the patient information as part of an agreement with the Royal Free NHS trust, which runs the Barnet, Chase Farm and Royal Free hospitals.
It includes information about people who are HIV-positive as well as details of drug overdoses, abortions and patient data from the past five years, according to a report by the New Scientist.
DeepMind announced in February that it was developing a software in partnership with NHS hospitals to alert staff to patients at risk of deterioration and death through kidney failure.
The technology, which is run through a smartphone app, has the support of Lord Darzi, a surgeon and former health minister who is director of the Institute of Global Health Innovation at Imperial College London.
However, the agreement on patient record sharing has caused concern among those who have already been concerned about Google’s moves in the healthcare sector.
A spokesperson for the Royal Free said patients would not be aware that data was being made available but it was encrypted and such an arrangement was standard practice.
Source: Google given access to healthcare data of up to 1.6 million patients | Technology | The Guardian
Join the Vox Political Facebook page.
If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!
Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
(but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:
Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.
Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:
The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:
Because he wants better health care for consumers.
By “consumers”, do you mean people who pay for it?
Great stand up comedy. Just wet myself with laughing
Because Tories hate anything from which they cannot enrich themselves and their cronies at public expense.
It is as simple as that isn’t it? Hunt is engaged in trying to fit saddles to all junior doctors to enable others to ride on their backs.
Yes, and no.
I mean patients. Who would surely be the ones who should pay for it.
They already do.
Sadly that’s not strictly. The money is taken from them, and _someone else_ makes the spending decisions, which both reduces patient choice and competition, keeping quality low.
Oh really? Considering the heights which public approval of the NHS had reached under Labour, and the depths to which it has fallen under the Conservatives, I consider your opinion to be worthless.
Thanks to this site, I had the opportunity of withholding my data. Not being privy to the whole statement though, this passage is misleading:-
“A spokesperson for the Royal Free said patients would not be aware that data was being made available but it was encrypted and such an arrangement was standard practice.”
Whats standard practice, ‘encryption’ ?
This sounds like a soundbite from DC.
The tories only want their own kind and the rich to have healthcare, the plebs can go without and die! Great seeing on the news the tories have blinked first on this subject!
The answer to the question is: Because that is how they receive additional funding in order to over-spend at electoral campaigns like they did in 2014 and 2015.
The profiteers obviously understand that the Tories must be on a bung of some kind.
It is not just football where dodgy practices take place.
Also, the Tories are happy to undermine public confidence in the NHS.
That makes it all the easier to privatize it.
Just ask that nice Mr Hunt – he has even written books about it.