Parliamentary debate won’t solve the scandal of PIP cuts – it can only be resolved in the courts
The words of Corri Wilson MP, which appear below, can only be strengthened by the fact that disability hate crime in London has more than tripled in a single year.
Can anything better illustrate the fact that this government has been “sending a dangerous message to the public that some disabilities are more worthy of support than others, and adding to the increasingly negative perceptions of disabled people that this Government has actively perpetuated”?
I don’t see that yet another debate in Parliament will help the cause of people with disabilities. We’ve had plenty of them before and nothing has changed.
It’s really long past time someone put together a legal case to show that government policy is responsible for the rise in hate crime, the increase in mental ill-health among the disabled, and for the many deaths – either self-inflicted or due to a formerly-treated condition running out of control due to lack of funds.
If a single person has died because of this, then the Tory government must be made to pay.
Just when it seemed that the UK Government’s cruel disregard for disabled people could not have been clearer, the Department for Work and Pensions ‘quietly’ announced another devastating barrage of cuts to Personal Independence Payments (PIP) at the end of February, ultimately excluding an estimated 160,000 people from vital financial assistance.
One thing is crystal clear – these new restrictions are targeted squarely at those suffering from mental health conditions, including autism, dementia and schizophrenia.
Invisible disabilities such as these are too often overlooked and misunderstood, and yet can be just as debilitating as many physical conditions. This was starkly exemplified last week during an LBC Radio phone-in when a clearly distressed caller spoke of his despair over the new raft of cuts.
In a scenario that has become all-too-familiar in the Tory era, he recalled friends suffering from mental health conditions who had attempted suicide following removal of their financial support.
That the Government’s approach forces him to think “People hate us. People hate our guts”, is a damning indictment of seven years of division and failed policies.
In the absence of a U-turn, the democratic way forward is for the Government to commit to a debate in Parliament, where MPs can stand up for the thousands of people in my own constituency, and in constituencies across the country, who will be impacted by this policy.
Accordingly, I have written to the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, Damian Green, urging a fundamental re-think of the policy and calling for a much-needed debate.
Join the Vox Political Facebook page.
If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!
Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
(but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:
Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.
The Livingstone Presumption is now available
in either print or eBook format here:
Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:
The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:
The disability hate crime emanated fro westminster, and if anyone should be prosecuted for the actions it is cameron.
Do you think if some one commited suicide and left a letter pointing finger AT the goverment pip and DWP if a letter was forwarded to goverment pip DWP AS I THINK THIS IS GOING TO BE THE ONLY WAY TO PROVE THAT THERE NASTY CUTS ARE KILLING PEOPLE IN WHICH I THINK IS MURDER
I always try to persuade people who come here contemplating suicide not to go through with it, but I also always say that if they feel they must, they should leave just such a letter – with family, the press and also the government, to ensure there can be no possible attempt at a cover-up.