Share this post:
“At 5% of FTSE 350 firms, the CEO earns over 200 times the median worker’s pay. That’s not a pay gap — that’s a chasm.”
We’ve known for years that the gulf between bosses and workers has become grotesque.
But the latest analysis of FTSE 350 pay ratios reminds us just how vast — and entrenched — that inequality has become.
In 2023/24, the median CEO earned 52 times what the average full-time UK worker earns.
For those on lower pay, it’s worse: the typical CEO made 71 times the pay of a worker at the 25th percentile.
In the FTSE 100, these ratios shoot up to 78:1 and 106:1 respectively.
And in some companies, they’re far beyond that: at five per cent of firms, CEOs are pulling in more than 200 times the pay of the average worker.
This isn’t just unjust — it’s unnecessary.
There was a time when mainstream economists and even business leaders took seriously the idea that there should be a ceiling on executive pay.
Legendary management thinker Peter Drucker argued that 20:1 was a reasonable upper limit — warning that greater gaps would undermine trust and social cohesion inside companies.
In the 2010s, there were political proposals in the UK and US alike to enshrine this kind of limit in law.
So what if we actually did it?
Six books are gone – 44 to go!
Just click on the image, make your donation
and provide your details!
The 20:1 thought experiment
Imagine a company where the CEO could earn no more than 20 times the lowest-paid full-time worker.
At current minimum wage levels (£12.21/hour in the UK), a full-time salary is around £23,837. Under a 20:1 cap, that would allow a CEO to earn £476,730 — not exactly hardship. But that’s a far cry from the £3.8 million median pay of FTSE 100 CEOs in 2023.
To stay within the 20:1 cap, companies would have two real options:
-
Lift up the bottom — raise wages across the workforce, especially at the lower end.
-
Reign in the top — reduce excessive executive compensation.
Either outcome would likely improve long-term productivity, morale, and equity — especially when coupled with redistributing excess profits as worker bonuses, investments in training, or more secure jobs.
Buy Cruel Britannia in print here. Buy the Cruel Britannia ebook here. Or just click on the image!
Models that work
This isn’t a utopian dream. It’s a working reality in some firms — just not many in the FTSE.
-
John Lewis operates as a worker-owned partnership. No one there earns more than 75 times the average pay — and executive pay was recently cut to preserve jobs.
-
The Mondragon Corporation in Spain, a network of cooperatives, has long maintained a CEO-to-worker ratio between 6:1 and 9:1.
-
In the US, Portland, Oregon imposes higher corporate tax rates on companies with excessive pay gaps — an idea the UK could adopt tomorrow.
Meanwhile, B Corporations (which must meet social and environmental standards) are more likely to cap internal pay ratios. In many of these firms, the gap between top and bottom is under 10:1.
Why aren’t we doing the same?
Get my free guide: “10 Political Lies You Were Sold This Decade” — just subscribe to our email list here:
👉 https://voxpoliticalonline.com
The justifications don’t hold
The standard argument is that we need sky-high pay to “attract talent.”
But five years of pay ratio disclosures show no clear link between performance and pay.
CEOs didn’t get richer because they were better — they got richer because they could.
That’s the deeper issue.
And meanwhile, the workers who generate actual value — the shop staff, drivers, cleaners, call centre reps, junior engineers — are paid just enough to survive.
In too many cases, not even that.
Six books are gone – 44 to go!
Just click on the image, make your donation
and provide your details!
From chasm to common sense
If the wealth generated by a company is shared more fairly, you get lower turnover, better morale, and more sustainable growth.
This isn’t anti-business — it’s anti-extraction.
A 20:1 economy would reward real contribution, foster internal solidarity, and leave room for investment in people and purpose.
Instead, we’re stuck in a system where 28 per cent of FTSE 350 firms pay their CEOs more than 100 times the lower-quartile worker’s wage — and nine percent of them pay more than 200 times.
In a healthy society, these would be red flags.
Here, they’re business as usual.
We can’t afford to let that stand.
The next time a company tells you it’s doing everything it can for its workers, ask them a simple question: how many worker lifetime salaries does your CEO earn in a year?
Now learn more
The High Pay Centre will be holding an informal call to discuss the report’s findings tomorrow (June 17, 2025), from 11am until midday – online (link available through online registration)
At the event, HPC researcher Paddy Goffey will present key findings from the report.
This will be followed by an open discussion in which audience members will be invited to share their reflections and responses.
Share this post:
Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
(but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:
Be among the first to know what’s going on! Here are the ways to manage it:
1) Register with us by clicking on ‘Subscribe’ (bottom right of the home page). You can then receive notifications of every new article that is posted here.
2) Follow VP on Twitter @VoxPolitical
3) Like the Facebook page at https://www.facebook.com/VoxPolitical/
Join the Vox Political Facebook page.
4) You could even make Vox Political your homepage at http://voxpoliticalonline.com
5) Follow Vox Political writer Mike Sivier on BlueSky
6) Join the MeWe page at https://mewe.com/p-front/voxpolitical
7) Feel free to comment!
And do share with your family and friends – so they don’t miss out!
If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!
Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.
Cruel Britannia is available
in either print or eBook format here:
The Livingstone Presumption is available
in either print or eBook format here:
Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:
The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:
What if… your boss didn’t earn 200 times more than you?
Share this post:
We’ve known for years that the gulf between bosses and workers has become grotesque.
But the latest analysis of FTSE 350 pay ratios reminds us just how vast — and entrenched — that inequality has become.
In 2023/24, the median CEO earned 52 times what the average full-time UK worker earns.
For those on lower pay, it’s worse: the typical CEO made 71 times the pay of a worker at the 25th percentile.
In the FTSE 100, these ratios shoot up to 78:1 and 106:1 respectively.
And in some companies, they’re far beyond that: at five per cent of firms, CEOs are pulling in more than 200 times the pay of the average worker.
This isn’t just unjust — it’s unnecessary.
There was a time when mainstream economists and even business leaders took seriously the idea that there should be a ceiling on executive pay.
Legendary management thinker Peter Drucker argued that 20:1 was a reasonable upper limit — warning that greater gaps would undermine trust and social cohesion inside companies.
In the 2010s, there were political proposals in the UK and US alike to enshrine this kind of limit in law.
So what if we actually did it?
Six books are gone – 44 to go!
Just click on the image, make your donation
and provide your details!
The 20:1 thought experiment
Imagine a company where the CEO could earn no more than 20 times the lowest-paid full-time worker.
At current minimum wage levels (£12.21/hour in the UK), a full-time salary is around £23,837. Under a 20:1 cap, that would allow a CEO to earn £476,730 — not exactly hardship. But that’s a far cry from the £3.8 million median pay of FTSE 100 CEOs in 2023.
To stay within the 20:1 cap, companies would have two real options:
Lift up the bottom — raise wages across the workforce, especially at the lower end.
Reign in the top — reduce excessive executive compensation.
Either outcome would likely improve long-term productivity, morale, and equity — especially when coupled with redistributing excess profits as worker bonuses, investments in training, or more secure jobs.
Buy Cruel Britannia in print here. Buy the Cruel Britannia ebook here. Or just click on the image!
Models that work
This isn’t a utopian dream. It’s a working reality in some firms — just not many in the FTSE.
John Lewis operates as a worker-owned partnership. No one there earns more than 75 times the average pay — and executive pay was recently cut to preserve jobs.
The Mondragon Corporation in Spain, a network of cooperatives, has long maintained a CEO-to-worker ratio between 6:1 and 9:1.
In the US, Portland, Oregon imposes higher corporate tax rates on companies with excessive pay gaps — an idea the UK could adopt tomorrow.
Meanwhile, B Corporations (which must meet social and environmental standards) are more likely to cap internal pay ratios. In many of these firms, the gap between top and bottom is under 10:1.
Why aren’t we doing the same?
Get my free guide: “10 Political Lies You Were Sold This Decade” — just subscribe to our email list here:
👉 https://voxpoliticalonline.com
The justifications don’t hold
The standard argument is that we need sky-high pay to “attract talent.”
But five years of pay ratio disclosures show no clear link between performance and pay.
CEOs didn’t get richer because they were better — they got richer because they could.
That’s the deeper issue.
And meanwhile, the workers who generate actual value — the shop staff, drivers, cleaners, call centre reps, junior engineers — are paid just enough to survive.
In too many cases, not even that.
Six books are gone – 44 to go!
Just click on the image, make your donation
and provide your details!
From chasm to common sense
If the wealth generated by a company is shared more fairly, you get lower turnover, better morale, and more sustainable growth.
This isn’t anti-business — it’s anti-extraction.
A 20:1 economy would reward real contribution, foster internal solidarity, and leave room for investment in people and purpose.
Instead, we’re stuck in a system where 28 per cent of FTSE 350 firms pay their CEOs more than 100 times the lower-quartile worker’s wage — and nine percent of them pay more than 200 times.
In a healthy society, these would be red flags.
Here, they’re business as usual.
We can’t afford to let that stand.
The next time a company tells you it’s doing everything it can for its workers, ask them a simple question: how many worker lifetime salaries does your CEO earn in a year?
Now learn more
The High Pay Centre will be holding an informal call to discuss the report’s findings tomorrow (June 17, 2025), from 11am until midday – online (link available through online registration)
At the event, HPC researcher Paddy Goffey will present key findings from the report.
This will be followed by an open discussion in which audience members will be invited to share their reflections and responses.
Share this post:
Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
(but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:
Be among the first to know what’s going on! Here are the ways to manage it:
1) Register with us by clicking on ‘Subscribe’ (bottom right of the home page). You can then receive notifications of every new article that is posted here.
2) Follow VP on Twitter @VoxPolitical
3) Like the Facebook page at https://www.facebook.com/VoxPolitical/
Join the Vox Political Facebook page.
4) You could even make Vox Political your homepage at http://voxpoliticalonline.com
5) Follow Vox Political writer Mike Sivier on BlueSky
6) Join the MeWe page at https://mewe.com/p-front/voxpolitical
7) Feel free to comment!
And do share with your family and friends – so they don’t miss out!
If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!
Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.
Cruel Britannia is available
in either print or eBook format here:
The Livingstone Presumption is available
in either print or eBook format here:
Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:
The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:
you might also like
Tories and Lib Dems engineer fastest fall in wages since Victorian times
The self-employment deception will leave Osborne wrong-footed over tax returns
Keep talking, Iain – your idiot ideas will run your party right out of office