Why did the Tories propose vague ‘anti-terror’ law that they now plan to ditch?
The important question here is why the Conservatives felt the need to propose it in the first place.
Another tool to subjugate the masses?
Amber Rudd fuelled fears the Counter Extremism Bill will be axed during an appearance before MPs and peers.
Doubts have been mounting over the Bill’s future ever since it was announced in last year’s Queen Speech.
Critics said it failed to outline a clear definition of the problem it was designed to tackle.
Source: Tory Home Secretary signals Theresa May’s flagship anti-terror law could be ditched
Join the Vox Political Facebook page.
If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!
Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
(but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:
Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.
The Livingstone Presumption is now available
in either print or eBook format here:
Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:
The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:
Possibly to divert attention from some of their other nasty tricks they are up to.
Maybe they had trouble getting a definition of terrorism that didn’t include their behaviour?