Are the dead of Grenfell Tower STILL being charged RENT?
This is ghoulish: It seems Kensington and Chelsea Borough Council may still be taking rent money from the dead and missing residents of Grenfell Tower.
Watch this video of Yvette Williams, from campaigning group Justice 4 Grenfell, explaining the situation:
Grenfell Tower survivor says Kensington & Chelsea Council charged her rent after her flat was destroyed by the blaze pic.twitter.com/yPLrwLWGoR
— Socialist Voice (@SocialistVoice) July 2, 2017
Ms Williams had previously said:
Shocking… Yvette Williams says that a surviving #GrenfellTower resident discovered rent had been taken from her account #Justice4Grenfell pic.twitter.com/G49FfrmPTo
— Ben Claimant 💚 Join a Union (@BenClaimant) July 1, 2017
The cynic in me is whispering that it is an almost-perfect scam; because the emergency services have been gagged, and cannot say whether more than 79 people are dead, the council can take money from the missing people’s bank accounts – never mind the fact that, under housing law, the authority is clearly in breach of contract because nobody could say Grenfell Tower is suitable accommodation now!
The money would then sit in KCBC’s bank account, accumulating interest and adding to the £270+ million of reserves owned by that very rich authority, until the number and names of the dead are finally confirmed – an event which may not happen until sometime around Christmas.
Only then will relatives or those empowered as executors of the dead people’s estates be able to access the financial details of the deceased and find out whether they have still been charged rent, and they would still have to challenge the council for the return of the funds – a matter that could take several more months.
When they council finally pays the money back, it would keep any interest earned on it.
If that is what has happened here, I do not think words exist that could adequately express my disgust.
Meanwhile, council representatives are trying to brush off criticism. Listen to the state of this:
Cllr Catherine Faulks: Grenfell residents still being charged rent is a 'tiny thing' & 'there is a lot of hand holding going on' #R4Today pic.twitter.com/yZmleIMzqD
— Helen Hoddinott (@helenhoddinott) July 1, 2017
It’s a “tiny thing”, according to this (Tory, of course) councillor. She changed her tune straight away but the slip gave her away.
You sort of assume that Tory councillors in Kensington & Chelsea are going to be appalling people, & then it turns out that they really are. https://t.co/vI7M3Ofnk1
— Chris Brooke (@chrisbrooke) July 1, 2017
All too true!
There has been better news. Look at this show of solidarity with the victims of Grenfell – happening all over London:
This happened. Banner drops all over London for #Grenfell https://t.co/EMFiB7ekXL
— Paul Mason (@paulmasonnews) June 30, 2017
And then the resignations started – prompted by this?
https://twitter.com/gaurangmorjaria/status/880768426435858432
https://twitter.com/ToryFibs/status/880773201206411264
Shortly after, the first quitter appeared:
Grenfell Tower management boss Robert Black quits 'to assist with inquiry' https://t.co/5xgRbfRh6A pic.twitter.com/dmEKM2fm4j
— ITV News (@itvnews) June 30, 2017
Does “to assist with the inquiry” mean “to spend more time with his lawyers”?
He was swiftly followed by KCBC leader Nick Paget-Brown:
https://twitter.com/MxJackMonroe/status/880825517963976706
I had something to say about this:
Ha – resigning KCBC leader Nick Paget-Brown has been asked if it's the first good decision he's made. #GrenfellTower #Marr
— Mike Sivier (@MidWalesMike) July 2, 2017
And so did Labour:
It is right that the Kensington & Chelsea Leader has resigned after his handling of the Grenfell fire – @GwynneMP https://t.co/rWY072YfEs
— Labour Press (@labourpress) June 30, 2017
Perhaps the council’s deputy leader should also be considering his position, after Private Eye revealed his comments about Grenfell’s cladding after it was installed last year:
(From
Private Eye 1447)….#GrenfellTower #RBKC "Safe" "Well integrated"…… pic.twitter.com/J6sElM4MRO— Parliament View (@parliamentview) June 30, 2017
Mr Paget-Brown had to go after a farcical attempt to ban the press and the public from a council meeting held to discuss the inferno at Grenfell Tower. Apparently he claimed he had taken legal advice that it was permissible (it wasn’t):
Lawyers would not have advised NPB on what political decision to take. They would only advise on the legal framework. He needs to own this. https://t.co/al61IcWrIz
— The Secret Barrister (@BarristerSecret) June 30, 2017
Representatives of the press had to get a High Court order, forbidding the council from holding its discussions in closed session – and now The Guardian has demanded assurances that no further such attempt will be made:
https://twitter.com/peterwalker99/status/880815750474235904
Of course, Councillor “Tiny Thing” Faulks was on hand to claim the whole fiasco was a storm in a teacup:
Tory councillor says court order making council’s private Grenfell fire meeting public was a 'stunt' https://t.co/n3RbmLEvZU
— The Independent (@Independent) July 1, 2017
Not everybody was running to their lawyer for cover, though. Rydon Construction, the firm responsible for putting flammable cladding around every resident of Grenfell, is threatening legal action against anybody who makes accusations about its conduct:
Firm that refurbished Grenfell Tower threatens legal action against council | UK news | The Guardian https://t.co/cyIxXX5oBf
— Samuel Miller (@Hephaestus7) June 30, 2017
Considering the circumstances, the response has been predictable:
If only @RydonGroup had been as concerned about inflammatory cladding as they are now about inflammatory statements:https://t.co/B27zTtlUan pic.twitter.com/buizG705CE
— Tom Pride (@ThomasPride) June 30, 2017
Labour MPs, and survivors’ groups, have called for KCBC to be stripped of its powers to handle the ongoing crisis:
#GrenfellTower: Kensington and Chelsea Council should be stripped of its powers, Labour and survivors groups say https://t.co/CQhjVmVnIN
— MagsNews (@MagsNews) June 30, 2017
The fact that no accurate count of the dead is likely for many months is a source of huge frustration to the survivors of Grenfell and campaigners who are helping them. They have launched their own, independent, attempt to find the answers the authorities won’t give them:
https://twitter.com/cliodiaspora/status/881081582148366336
Finally, concerns have been raised that the inquiry into what happened at Grenfell Tower is being launched under terms that are far too narrow. The judge appointed to chair it, Sir Martin Moore-Bick, has already said as much and others have joined their voices to his:
Limiting Grenfell enquiry to proximate cause of fire is eerily reminiscent of limiting 1989 Hillsborough hearing to 3:15 pm on day #CoverUp
— Prof Patrick McGhee (@ProfMcGhee) June 30, 2017
#Grenfell inquiry “too narrow” says @jeremycorbyn in letter to PM https://t.co/MTMcoGIhKx pic.twitter.com/yfP3QHQvOx
— Labour Press (@labourpress) June 30, 2017
Perhaps the last word should go to This Site’s old friend, Samuel Miller. With a canny eye for an appropriate comparison, he tweeted this:
How to tell if the establishment is lying to us over Grenfell Tower? Theresa May appoints IDS to determine the final death toll.
— Samuel Miller (@Hephaestus7) June 30, 2017
I spent two years trying to get Mr Duncan Smith to release mortality statistics of people claiming sickness and disability benefits, and when they were finally published, they were incomplete – so I hope you understand exactly what Mr Miller means.
(More information about Grenfell is coming out constantly. This is the second article I have written today (Sunday, July 2) on the fallout from the fire – you can read the other by visiting this address.)
Join the Vox Political Facebook page.
If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!
Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
(but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:
Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.
The Livingstone Presumption is now available
in either print or eBook format here:
Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:
The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:
None of the residents of Grenfell Tower should be paying rent especially those who are dead and missing. In fact Kensington and Chelsea Borough Council should be paying them for all the problems, hurt and contributing to the deaths the council has caused.
Re: Cllr. Catherine Faulks; it’s her attitude! She needs some training on how to deal with members of the public! I used to work for local government, in the finance department, which has nothing to do with housing; that’s a different department. Social Work is also a different department. Council Rents is also a different department, within finance, which incorporates Council Tax, Business Rates, Housing Benefit etc.. A single dedicated person, in the Rents team, could have sorted this but I suspect that nobody thought of it; I don’t believe that it was malicious, merely incompetent, or that people’s minds were focused elsewhere, which, in this case, amounts to the same thing.
What I don’t like, apart from her condescending manner (hand-holding!) is the fact that immediately, she went on the defensive! “I… well, I’m very sorry to hear that and I can understand that’s very distressing but if you think that at the moment we’ve got, erm…” That didn’t sound much like she was sorry, to me. Can understand, or do understand? What about an explanation? It was an oversight… It was a mistake. Steps are being taken to ensure that this doesn’t happen… Anybody to whom this has happened will receive an immediate refund… None of that. “Tiny thing”! Even if she thought it, why did it come out of her mouth? I’ll not say that it’s inexcusable, because we are all human and we make mistakes but take responsibility; that is, after all, what you were elected to do and are paid for. How have we ended up in a situation whereby those who are elected and paid to be take responsibility avoid it, at all costs? Step up, or step down!
The council are the biggest Theaves out and it we were to do this we would be hung drawer and quartered and all the rent and interest should be given to NHS not the council. I lost a good friend in the tower of hell.
Judy
IDS is as incompetant at keeping true records (or in some instances ANY records at all ) as george osbourne was at adding up.
There are words that describe this atrocity, the in-human way councils deal with anything that is beyond their remit, and the blame game that will follow, they are FUBAR