Evidence mounts against the authorities over the Grenfell Tower disaster [STRONG LANGUAGE]
The Metropolitan Police have released images of the interior of Grenfell Tower. Take a look (video from RT as the tweet I tried to use took you to a different website):
That is the physical effect of what happened to that housing block last week. The effect on the survivors – and the effect on British politics – will continue for some time to come.
Of course the latest Jonathan Pie video clip had to be about Grenfell – and asks hard questions. Here it is:
“I’d be amazed if cuts and the ideology of austerity hasn’t in some way contributed to this.”
Let’s have a look, shall we?
For a start, it has emerged that the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea, the council responsible for Grenfell Tower, had stockpiled more than £274 million of usable reserves after years of what The Independent describes as “chronic underspending”. Austerity?
https://twitter.com/JosieLong/status/876225877956329472
This Writer understands that £10 million was made available to refurbish Grenfell Tower, but only £8.6 million of it was used. The difference between the cost of flame-proof cladding and the highly-flammable cladding that was used instead was just £5,000 in total. Cuts?
That would have left £1,395,000 – and I am sure a sprinkler system would not have cost that much. Austerity?
But the decision was made not to buy and install those things and now we are being told 58 people are believed to have died. How many have actually died?
I suggested a couple of days ago that someone should add up the number of people who got out safely and the number in hospital, subtract that from the number of residents and use the answer as a ballpark figure. Evolve Politics has done that – and you’re not going to like the answer:
Grenfell had 600 residents living there. 65 have been rescued, 74 in hospital, 30 dead.
This means 431 people are still unaccounted for. pic.twitter.com/Tc3bGV2PX6
— Evolve Politics (@evolvepolitics) June 18, 2017
It means 461 residents – out of 600 – may have died.
Oh, but wait – we may never see the correct figure recorded, for the following reasons:
Theresa May's days are numbered *if* there's any truth to this. #Marr pic.twitter.com/sdEfPAkfmF
— Rachael Swindon (@Rachael_Swindon) June 18, 2017
The relevant part states: “The government have made a report system to make [it] look like deaths by fire have dropped. So, if people jumped out the window because of the fire and died, they did not die becayuse of the ‘fire’ but from self-inflicted causes… In laymen’s terms, if 10 people were in a fire, and nine jumped and died and one died in the building, then the news will report one death by fire.”
We have already heard that anybody who dies in hospital from injuries suffered during a fire will not be listed as having died because of that blaze.
Philip Hammond, the Chancellor of the Exchequer, appeared on The Andrew Marr Show on Sunday (June 18), when he said expert advice had been sought on whether a sprinkler system would have been effective – to scornful laughter from the Twitterati, and rightly so:
Philip Hammond holds an important position and looks after the budget but he needs an expert to tell him that water puts out fire #Marr
— Filthy Logic (@filthy_logic) June 18, 2017
They definitely help with the smoke, making it easier for people to get out.
— Arkenor (@Arkenor) June 18, 2017
https://twitter.com/alexnunns/status/876363487290720258
Hammond 'Sprinklers might not be the best way to put out fires'
Also breaking news: clocks might not be the best way to tell the time#marr— Alison R (@Alibobbleobs) June 18, 2017
Was at BBC today when Hammond arrived. People were kept away. An out of touch minister in out of touch government. https://t.co/M5gcVKGuAQ
— Marcus Chown (@marcuschown) June 18, 2017
Tomorrow, #PhilipHammond will propose that showering with water is perhaps not the best way to stay clean. #Grenfell
— John Smith (son of Harry Leslie Smith) (@Harryslaststand) June 18, 2017
Never forget that when #PhilipHammond casts doubt on sprinklers for containing fires in buildings that he is also a landlord.
— John Smith (son of Harry Leslie Smith) (@Harryslaststand) June 18, 2017
That would make him one of the 70+ Tory landlords who voted against Jeremy Corbyn’s proposals to make all rented accommodation fit for human habitation, then.
As is Nick Hurd, Theresa May’s new Police and Fire minister.
Here’s the most pertinent comment, from Mr Morgan’s co-host on ITV breakfast television, Susanna Reid:
Chancellor Phillip Hammond says wait for expert advice on fitting sprinklers. Coroner has already made recommendation pic.twitter.com/EtVDs90UTH
— Susanna Reid (@susannareid100) June 18, 2017
Would that be from the report that housing ministers including Gavin Barwell, Theresa May’s new chief of staff, hushed up for four years? (Yes, it would.) Mr Barwell has refused to apologise for his inaction.
This is also interesting:
#Labour tried to get tower block sprinkler funding into London budget. Boris and Tories voted it downhttps://t.co/7IffVxeQl7
— MagsNews (@MagsNews) June 18, 2017
‘Boris’ is Boris Johnson, of course, London Mayor at the time of this attempt (2013). He is now Tory foreign secretary. While we’re discussing him…
Safety audit of tower blocks in Kensington & Chelsea was cancelled last year due to lack of firefighters. @BorisJohnson blood on your hands.
— Aaron Bastani (@AaronBastani) June 18, 2017
Mr Johnson is being suggested as a possible future Tory leader/prime minister – but his image may be tarnished by his connection with this disaster, which is why – it seems – David Davis is being touted as a ‘caretaker’ if Theresa May gets the push.
https://twitter.com/MxJackMonroe/status/876565839864057856
In the same interview, Mr Hammond said: “I think we should be proud of the way we cleared out a lot of the unnecessary regulation to make life easier, particularly for small businesses.”
Yes indeed. But it seems it may have been the clearing of those regulations may have resulted in the disaster – which was entirely avoidable, according to architect Deon Lombard, writing in The Guardian. He states:
Building control departments in many local authorities have been eviscerated. They are invariably under-resourced with no teeth. Often a subset of planning departments, they lack the authority to carry out what is arguably the most important part of a local authority’s remit – to ensure the safety of its residents. Furthermore this function has been partly privatised, with a range of companies competing for the business. It is often those companies with a reputation for gaining “easy” approvals that increasingly dominate the market, further undercutting the council building control.
Second, fire officers play a crucial role in ensuring that all fire regulations are met, and devising a fire strategy for a project [but] a new form of self-certification was … introduced, with the onus on the developer/owner to ensure a project met all fire regulations. This took no cognisance of the fact that different buildings could have very different fire requirements.
The third part of the triple lock is to ensure that all materials used in a building are fit for purpose – obviously particularly important in the case of fire safety… With architects now seldom having the authority to insist on specific products being used, there is a tendency to go for cheaper materials, without necessarily understanding the impact or potential knock-on effect.
Cuts and austerity?
According to the Mirror, tower block safety checks have been cut by a quarter since the Conservatives came to power in 2010.
It seems 30,000 buildings in the UK have been fitted with the flammable cladding, according to Metro – but the company responsible, Harley Facades, says it is “not aware of any link between the fire and the exterior cladding”.
Perhaps this is the reason:
There must have been builders that knew cladding was fire risk. Because of culture of persecuting whistleblowers in UK, couldn't speak out
— Mr Ethical (@nw_nicholas) June 18, 2017
At least Harley Facades was still admitting it had been involved. It seems other firms have been stripping any such evidence from their websites. Labour MP David Lammy, who lost a friend to the fire, asked very important questions about whether other information was being quietly deleted before the police could seize it. He got a hostile response from a Sky News presenter but just watch his reaction:
Trust is very, very low. Contractors are removing Grenfell details from their websites. What else are they deleting? pic.twitter.com/y9G76Cv8v6
— David Lammy (@DavidLammy) June 18, 2017
Residents of Grenfell Tower had been complaining about fire safety – or the lack of it – in the building for many months, and had made it clear they considered “only a catastrophic event will expose the ineptitude and incompetence of our landlord, the KCTMO [Kensington and Chelsea Tenant Management Organisation – a private company running social housing in the borough on behalf of the council], and bring to an end the dangerous living conditions and neglect of health and safety legislation that they inflict upon their tenants and leaseholders… It is our conviction that a serious fire in a tower block… is the most likely reason those who wield power at the KCTMO will be found out and brought to justice”.
Their complaints fell on deaf ears. In fact, the council wrote to two of those concerned, threatening them with legal action if they didn’t stop.
The response of the RBKC to the disaster has been haphazard at best – although a better description would be chaotic, although you’d never know if you believed council leader Nick Pagett-Brown. Here’s his response to the original cladding work (carried out, according to this, by a company called Rydon):
https://twitter.com/liz727/status/876562364434448384
And here he is discussing the disaster:
This is the Tory leader of Kensington Council. (Yes Breitbart, it's a Tory council). Why is he still in charge?pic.twitter.com/eZjcuJK1oM
— Rachael Swindon (@Rachael_Swindon) June 18, 2017
Kensington Council Leader Tory @NickPagetBrown1 hasn't got time for resigning. Social cleansing would probably keep me busy too, Nicholas.
— Rachael Swindon (@Rachael_Swindon) June 18, 2017
We’ll get back to the meaning of that ‘social cleansing’ comment presently. First, we should note that co-ordination of relief efforts was taken away from Tory-run RBKC and handed to officers from Labour-run Ealing Council, who are reportedly doing a much better job.
5 days on Government finally recognises Kensington/Chelsea Boro total failure re Grenfell fire and drafts civil servants in: Why so late?
— Jon Snow (@jonsnowC4) June 18, 2017
The way the council has treated the survivors of Grenfell Tower is abominable.
It seems Mr Pagett-Brown has been caught out in a lie:
They arrived at the Latimer centre after 11am and officers with cash around 2pm. Pagett brown and his cronies are Tory liars.
— Tom Burke 🌻🌻🇺🇦🌻🌻 (@TomBurke01) June 18, 2017
What have they been doing with their money? Watch:
Shocking: Volunteer Nisha Parti says victims of #GrenfellTower fire have no access to donated funds and are being given 'a tenner'. #Peston pic.twitter.com/FXy1Er0Qkk
— EL4C (@EL4JC) June 18, 2017
Watch:
"Why are people sleeping on floors when housing is available". What an inspirational young lady. #Marr #Peston pic.twitter.com/gcnFgEoAA9
— Rachael Swindon (@Rachael_Swindon) June 18, 2017
So the press has been putting forward a misleading impression of what’s been happening, a government task force to help victims was nowhere in sight, and people were still sleeping on floors. So much for Theresa May’s contribution:
— Man In The Shed (@Think_Blue_Sky) June 18, 2017
Mrs May’s lack of interest has provoked angry disagreement between high-profile commentators:
https://twitter.com/James4Labour/status/876378548642226176
So spare me the 'leave poor Theresa alone' crap.
She's not deserving of compassion, not least because she seems incapable of offering it.— Piers Morgan (@piersmorgan) June 17, 2017
Tell that to the people from Grenfell who met her in Downing St yesterday. Judging from what they said afterwards they would beg to differ. https://t.co/QdrGrmNZU9
— Iain Dale ⚒️🇺🇦.🇮🇱 (@IainDale) June 18, 2017
Not a person I met near Grenfell would beg for anything. Proud and angry was the mood. https://t.co/YqlBthD2z1
— Paul Lewis (@paullewismoney) June 18, 2017
They’re getting something anyway. An emergency fund has been announced by the government, totalling £5 million. Let’s put that in context:
MP expenses are around £115m a year. £369m for Buckingham Palace. But we can only manage £5m for the victims of Grenfell Tower. Priorities.
— Rachael Swindon (@Rachael_Swindon) June 18, 2017
We’re told that every survivor will get £5,500 from this fund. That is just £357,500. Who gets the rest?
Downing St: Every household who lost home in #GrenfellTower fire to get £5500 from £5m fund. Details tomorrow. So that leaves well over £4m.
— Paul Lewis (@paullewismoney) June 18, 2017
Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn made an important point about the fact that people are still sleeping on the floor of the local leisure centre:
Good to see Jeremy Corbyn telling it how it is. Where is the Prime Minister? pic.twitter.com/whboIsh8TO
— Rachael Swindon (@Rachael_Swindon) June 18, 2017
Presumably the prime minister is on the side of RBKC, which is apparently forcing the Grenfell Tower survivors to move as far away as Preston – or be re-categorised as “intentionally homeless”:
Victims being sent Preston? Accept what's offered or you're "intentionally homeless". These people are humans ffs. https://t.co/Mu3WaIJsWQ
— Rachael Swindon (@Rachael_Swindon) June 18, 2017
More on families forced out of London. Chart displays only figures from the 15 councils who responded to FOI request https://t.co/EngZUXuNdL pic.twitter.com/n6TYrPmAth
— Dan Hancox (@danhancox) June 18, 2017
This is a scandal without precedent. Locals adamant more than 100 dead, meanwhile council moving survivors out of London. Sickening. https://t.co/o3kut9RnRq
— Aaron Bastani (@AaronBastani) June 18, 2017
Interestingly:
Spoken to housing expert. This could well be illegal: council has legal duty to house them & find long term like-for-like accommodation. https://t.co/IvLxkNEJGj
— Aaron Bastani (@AaronBastani) June 18, 2017
In Portugal 61 dead, govt announces 3 days of national mourning. Possible 100 s dead at #GrenfellTower fire & survivors treated like rubbish
— Lady Blah Blah 🍉 (@glynbmil) June 18, 2017
With the residents out of the way, RBKC may consider what to do with the burnt-out shell of Grenfell Tower itself – and should consider it very carefully. Remember, in the immediate aftermath of the fire, there were recriminations against the council for wanting to ‘gentrify’ this part of London, pushing out the poor to make way for luxury apartments for the very rich. Any move in that direction now could be seen as an admission of guilt.
Paul Lewis has made this suggestion:
How about keeping Grenfell Tower as it is. Not a war grave, but a class war grave. And a monument to hubris, profit, and stupidity. pic.twitter.com/nyySeA5rzN
— Paul Lewis (@paullewismoney) June 18, 2017
This Writer cannot support the idea because the building is in a dangerous condition.
But it would serve the council right if it were forced to turn the site into a memorial – a garden of remembrance, perhaps – ensuring that no greedy businesses profit from the deaths of hundreds of innocent people.
Looking at all the evidence, you can see where the finger of blame is pointing:
At the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea.
At Philip Hammond.
At Nick Hurd.
At Gavin Barwell.
At Boris Johnson.
At the other Tory MPs who are landlords.
At the Conservative government in general, including all its members since 2010.
At the companies hired to carry out substandard improvement work on Grenfell House, using substandard materials.
At the mainstream news media.
And at Theresa May, the prime minister.
Do you think any of them will face justice over it?
#Tories just cannot accept responsibility for any part in #Grenfell
Utterly reckless when it comes to any form of social responsibility
— Nick (@Mylegalforum) June 18, 2017
If not, who will?
https://twitter.com/xugla/status/876537163881611264
This will not go away; more information is certain to become available soon.
Join the Vox Political Facebook page.
If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!
Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
(but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:
Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.
The Livingstone Presumption is now available
in either print or eBook format here:
Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:
The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:
Why are they ding the true casualty figures from the public?
The two things from this information that concern me intensly is the description, albeit second hand, from on the ground firemen describing the body bag count as in the 100’s yet the media count still seems at odds with this high number.. I rather believe first hand witness statements than a media being fed data by the Elite puppets. What is the correct death count, irrespective of how they died, resulting from this incident. The Government controls the media they will have to declare the count so stop hiding the facts……Gov talks about controlling fake news yet Gov actually creates fake news. The control of all data and information regarding this refurb including computers emails minutes of meetings that are not on public record need safeguarding although probably to late in a lot of cases now. Did the police go in and taken possession of all the necessary criminal evidence. I would also
be taking physical evidence from all the flats that were not firedamaged and intact including undamaged cladding so that the actual evidence of product and build quality and what was actually used in protecting these occupants is safely captured…. before it is convenently lost as real evidence. A lot of substandard materials have been imported into this country with its paperwork claiming to be EU standard but found later from EU studies to be far short of what was claimed on its imported paperwork. From the films of the destruction it appears that walls that form the compartments were solid however the internal divide walls probably plasterboard all seems missing and destroyed. If solid walls were not used as compartmentalisation then even fire rated plaster board would not have been much of a fire break to prevent spread. Speed of investigation is crucial for experts to capture evidence for much later and needs to be made secure.
Add in the deaths that have yet to happen, among those people who had to make their way out of the burning building choking on the chemical laden neurotoxic, endocrine disrupting, carcinogenic etc smoke. Cancers, heart disease, lungs and other organ failure, brain aneurysms, miscarriages and neonate deaths and/or disabilities. Every one of the survivors and most first emergency responders (especially the firemen & women) face shortened lives even with the required specialised health care & monitoring … which I doubt they will receive anyhow.
I’m amazed that there are 41% of voters still identifying as tory. We are now negotiating Brexit without a government and without a plan. Looking at May’s three principal negotiators, most of us would hesitate to let them into our houses to do something as uncomplicated as read a gas meter. May and the tories are utterly fragmented and it’s unpatriotic of them to try to hang on to power when they’re so incapable of government.
David
I live in a block it looks just like Grenfell and it is same no sprinklers no fire escapes its 21 floors high Grenfell was 24 it is done up same way as Grenfell cheape and nasty, brodickhouse saxon road tower hamlets. are we to suffer the same fate as these poor souls like Grenfell did before something is done. the building was only designed to be up 30 years its been up 60 now and they want to keep paper overing the cracks to keep saving money.most of the money thats been granted to councils from goverment is being spent on councilors keep giving there selfs fat wage increases all the time whilst the poor are getting drip fed. a councilor can get anything between ten thousand upwards to attend a meeting that may only be a hour long its a bloody disgrace i have to work 6 months to earn anything like that.they own all the property’s around east London. this is were our money is being wasted or should i say saved, so these fat cats can get more wage increases more holidays for themselfs.i have worked for the council for 30 years so i know what i am talking about.and have watched how these people are ripping off the money being invested into the community for themselfs its a disgrace.
FOR WHAT IT IS WORTH I HAVE POSTED THIS ON MAY’S FB PAGE WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENT……….. IF YOU HAD THE SLIGHTEST AMOUNT OF DECENCY YOU WOULD RESIGN. IT IS BECOMING CLEAR THAT THE NUMBER OF DEAD FROM THE FIRE AT GRENFELL TOWER VASTLY EXCEEDS OFFICIAL STATISTICS. WHATEVER ANGLE YOU LOOK AT THIS FROM YOU AND YOUR PARTY ARE CULPABLE. WHAT IS WORSE IS THAT THE AFTERMATH IS A SHAMBLES AS WELL. YOU BRING SHAME ON THIS COUNTRY..
I HAVE ALREADY SUGGESTED THE TOWER BE LEFT AS A MONUMENT TO TORY AUSTERITY AND GREED IN THE SAME WAY THE VILLAGE OF ORADOUR SUR GLANE, IN SOUTH WEST FRANCE WAS, WAS LEFT AS A REMINDER OF THE BARBARITY OF THE GERMAN SS WHO MURDERED ALL THE RESIDENTS WHILE RETREATING TOWARDS THE END OF WW2. SORRY ABOUT CAPITALS BOTH ANGRY AND WAITING FOR CATARACT OPS!