New Childcare Contract for ATOS – WHY

Last Updated: March 21, 2014By

Take particular note of the last paragraph – I have personal experience of the “vexatious” accusation!
I’m thinking of writing an autobiography and calling it ‘Vexatious Me’…
What I’d like to know is why there aren’t any British companies able to take up this role. Does the government not realise that paying a foreign company for services means money goes out of the UK and cannot contribute to our economy? Even if a British company can only provide the service at a higher price, the benefit is greater as the money stays within British borders.
… or am I making too much sense?

latest video

news via inbox

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.


  1. jaynel62 March 21, 2014 at 12:29 pm - Reply

    It was with you in mind Mike, that I wrote the last paragraph :-)
    And as for your question – I think you’re correct its precisely that you are making sense – something this Govt seem incapable of xx

  2. gfranklinpercival March 21, 2014 at 12:53 pm - Reply

    Mike, for reasons of fiscal efficiency, even if the contract was awarded to a British company, licence fees would have to be paid to somebody who lives in a PO Box in the Cayman Islands to preclude any chance of a profit arising.

  3. jeffrey davies March 21, 2014 at 2:36 pm - Reply

    there are to many ex mps or ministers with a finger in thise pie jeff3

  4. paul dutton March 21, 2014 at 7:37 pm - Reply

    I have not read the full article, I dont need to …. Crooked, dishonesty, bribery, funny hand shakes, the usual immoral practices from you know who !

Leave A Comment