New Childcare Contract for ATOS – WHY

Take particular note of the last paragraph – I have personal experience of the “vexatious” accusation!
I’m thinking of writing an autobiography and calling it ‘Vexatious Me’…
What I’d like to know is why there aren’t any British companies able to take up this role. Does the government not realise that paying a foreign company for services means money goes out of the UK and cannot contribute to our economy? Even if a British company can only provide the service at a higher price, the benefit is greater as the money stays within British borders.
… or am I making too much sense?

4 thoughts on “New Childcare Contract for ATOS – WHY

  1. jaynel62

    It was with you in mind Mike, that I wrote the last paragraph 🙂
    And as for your question – I think you’re correct its precisely that you are making sense – something this Govt seem incapable of xx

  2. gfranklinpercival

    Mike, for reasons of fiscal efficiency, even if the contract was awarded to a British company, licence fees would have to be paid to somebody who lives in a PO Box in the Cayman Islands to preclude any chance of a profit arising.

  3. paul dutton

    I have not read the full article, I dont need to …. Crooked, dishonesty, bribery, funny hand shakes, the usual immoral practices from you know who !

Comments are closed.