Hacking trial: what did Cameron really know?

Last Updated: June 26, 2014By

I suggested yesterday that a Prime Minister in a precarious position might find it handy to have someone who knows how to hack a phone on his payroll. Smiling Carcass agrees.
Do you?


  1. Mr.Angry June 26, 2014 at 7:56 am - Reply

    Here here my thoughts entirely and I would love to find out what IDS has on Cameron

  2. jeffrey davies June 26, 2014 at 8:21 am - Reply

    spot on

  3. Matthew Aldridge June 26, 2014 at 9:36 am - Reply

    Isn’t it strange that at the last general election Cameron seemed to be always one step ahead of Brown throughout his election campaign? Just a thought….

  4. Doc Weary June 26, 2014 at 10:18 am - Reply

    I echo Mr Angry’s reply, i would say that he knew and that an employee with such a skill would be a very useful asset.

  5. […] Hacking trial: what did Cameron really know?. […]

  6. Kerry Davies June 26, 2014 at 1:51 pm - Reply

    The conspiracist in me believes that Cameron deliberately sabotaged the second set of charges against Coulson because they carried a far heavier sentence than the hacking charges and Coulson promised to reveal all if he did not.

    We now know that even if Coulson was an exception on DV, to predecessors and those following, the fact that his deputy was DV vetted makes it inevitable that he was given exemptions because of the things that DV would have revealed.

    I think that at least some of the 200 plus being taken to trial will spill the beans over the next two years and this has a long long way to run yet.

  7. Thomas M June 26, 2014 at 4:16 pm - Reply

    Me too.

  8. Thomas M June 26, 2014 at 4:17 pm - Reply

    Btw, the me too comment was in answer to Mr Angry.

Leave A Comment