Court appearance for Cameron aide on child abuse charges

A Rock in a hard place: Patrick Rock, formerly a senior civil servant and policy advisor, who now faces allegations that he possessed indecent images of child abuse.

A Rock in a hard place: Patrick Rock, formerly a senior civil servant and policy advisor, who now faces allegations that he possessed indecent images of child abuse.

At long last, Patrick Rock – the former deputy head of 10 Downing Street’s policy unit and aide to David Cameron – is to appear on court to answer charges that he possessed imagery of children being abused.

He will appear at Southwark Crown Court for legal argument on October 16 – more than 20 months after his original arrest. This information was obtained by a member of the public, in spite of protracted attempts by the Cabinet Office to claim that it had no information about what was going on. You can read that particular saga here.

Mr Rock was arrested on February 13, suspected of possessing child abuse imagery – shortly after he resigned his position working on policies that we all thought were intended to make it harder to find such images on the Internet.

Details of his resignation and arrest were not released to the public, but the media sprang into action and in a matter of days, the Daily Mail ran a major story accusing three leading members of the Labour Party of sympathising with paedophile groups.

It was only after this story had run its course that the major news media made the public aware of Mr Rock’s arrest – and Vox Political was not the only blog that voiced suspicions about the sequence of events.

Rest assured that this case is likely to fade into obscurity again unless someone attends Southwark Crown Court on October 16 and publicises the date to which the case is adjourned.

Join the Vox Political Facebook page.

If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!

Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
(
but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:

Donate Button with Credit Cards

Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.

Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:

SWAHTprint SWAHTeBook

8 Comments

  1. wildswimmerpete September 14, 2015 at 2:09 pm - Reply

    “the Daily Mail ran a major story accusing three leading members of the Labour Party of sympathising with paedophile groups.”…………….The odious Lynton Crosby doing the work of his Conservative paymasters.

  2. Alistair Ralph Lazenby September 14, 2015 at 4:05 pm - Reply

    WHO DEFENDING HIM TEAM CAMERON IS IT -, THE BUNGS WILL FLYING EVERYWHERE, Wonder if judge and jury have been payed yet

    • Mike Sivier September 14, 2015 at 6:56 pm - Reply

      So you believe there may be a certain amount of bribery taking place? What makes you suggest that and do you have evidence available?

  3. AndyH September 14, 2015 at 11:23 pm - Reply

    Oh THAT’S why the sudden interest in PIE surfaced (and then died down). The old ‘burying bad news’.

  4. gfranklinpercival September 16, 2015 at 11:00 pm - Reply
  5. gfranklinpercival September 16, 2015 at 11:14 pm - Reply

    Let us not forget that Rock was one of Thatcher’s favourites and a thrice unsuccessful tory parliamentary candidate, nor that he and Cameron worked for Mr Michael Howard in the dim and distant.

    Also memorable is the fact that David Cameron managed to leave his prepubescent daughter Lucy in a public house.

    Was Uncle Patrick unavoidably delayed, one wonders?

  6. mrmarcpc September 17, 2015 at 5:33 pm - Reply

    Will we ever know the truth about these now famous child abuse stories, will we ever see this inquiry about it all produce results, I highly doubt it!

  7. sasson1 September 18, 2015 at 10:34 am - Reply

    Strange. From experience, a court case can take place up to 9 months or a year later, so in a simple case such as this, why has it taken 20 months? And that won’t be the main court case either, just one of the preliminary processes.

Leave A Comment