#EUref: Vote Leave and UKIP would keep 85 per cent of net migration as it is

160623 immigration-infograph-2

When UKIP talk about the reducing net migration to 50,000, or Brexit campaigners, like Priti Patel, call for drastic reduction in migration as it is ‘out of control‘ there are only two ways this can be achieved; we cut drastically the number of international students coming to the UK, therefore destroying the international education sector worth over seven billion to our economy.

Or we drastically cut those coming to the UK with skills causing a skills shortage of massive proportions in sectors like the NHS.

The Office of National Statistics (ONS) Migration Statistic Quarterly Report provides a wealth of data on the inflow and outflows of migration. For the year ending 2015 net migration was 286,000.  The report goes on to break down the net migration figures into the reasons for their migration.

Of the 286,000 figure 134,000, or 47 per cent of net migration, were students coming to our universities. On average since 2004, students coming to our world class universities have counted for 66 per cent of total net migration.

All parts of the  Leave Campaign, including UKIP, see International Students as positive for the country and do not want this to change.

Another 78,000 people, or 28 per cent of net migration, were those coming for ‘definite jobs’, therefore filling in the skill gaps in our economy. The Leave Campaign, including UKIP, are well aware that sectors including the NHS, would collapse if these skilled workers were not recruited, and have supported an ‘Australian Style’ immigration policy to recruit these skills.

Therefore, we can assume this figure will not change if there is a Brexit.

So finally, 58,000 people of the net migration figure for 2015 were  ‘looking for work’ from all around the world.  The ONS figures also point to  19,000 UK citizen going to the EU ‘looking for work’ with another  24,000 British Citizens coming back to the UK without work in 2015, a sizable number from the EU.

We could unrealistically suppose that there would be no one from the EU allowed to come to the UK ‘looking for work’ after Brexit, and there would not be a massive inflow in Brits coming back from the EU without jobs after Brexit – both probable.

But even then, being very generous in our estimates, the direct effect of leaving the EU on net migration would be a net reduction of 43,000 on last year.  In other words, the ‘dramatic’ effect of a Brexit would putting 15 per cent of the net migration within our control, and not necessary reduce it by that number.

Source: Vote Leave and UKIP would keep 85 per cent of net migration as it is | Left Foot Forward


Join the Vox Political Facebook page.

If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!

Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:

Donate Button with Credit Cards

Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.

Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:


4 thoughts on “#EUref: Vote Leave and UKIP would keep 85 per cent of net migration as it is

      1. joanna

        I argued those points and others to a couple of people who are voting leave, they couldn’t offer any cogent response, all I got was verbal abuse,such as “you are an uneducated nobody on the sick” and “you (me) should be put in a mental hospital”
        I have taken no notice, the person who said that really means nothing to me. At least I am trying by going to college in September!

    1. Daniel

      Yes it could, since part of the agreement involves open boarders between N.Ireland and the Republic. Brexit would require border controls between the two countries, which would threaten the agreement.

      There’s more to it than that, but that is the most direct way it threatens the agreement.

Comments are closed.