Melania Trump sues Mail Online *again* because it ‘ruined her chances of cashing in as First Lady’
Commercial brand: Donald Trump and his wife Melania.
This will be of interest to our readers in the United States, who seem to be starved of this kind of information for some reason.
The First Lady of the United States is not letting the Daily Mail off the hook in a lawsuit that has Washington shocked.
In August last year the Daily Mail published (and then retracted) a false article claiming that Melania Trump had once worked as an escort.
The article was published in print and online.
More astonishingly, she claims in the lawsuit that the Mail robbed her of a ‘once-in-a-lifetime’ opportunity to cash in as the First Lady.
The text of the lawsuit reads:
“Plaintiff had the unique, once-in-a-lifetime opportunity, as an extremely famous and well-known person…to launch a broad-based commercial brand in multiple product categories, each of which could have garnered multi-million dollar business relationships for a multi-year term during which plaintiff is one of the most photographed women in the world.”
In other words, the Trumps aren’t even hiding the fact they want to cash in on business opportunities while in the White House.
Join the Vox Political Facebook page.
If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!
Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
(but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:
Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.
The Livingstone Presumption is now available
in either print or eBook format here:
Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:
The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:
She was a model, clearly defaming her by claiming she was an escort could have a detrimental effect on her career as a model because no brand would want an escort girl as their face, or any new business she may have decided upon like perfume or clothes a common route for ex models. Where in the statement did she say being first lady in the claim? This looks like false news from a paper renown for it.
“For a multi-year term during which plaintiff is one of the most photographed women in the world.”
It’s hard to take sides on this one. Both equally obnoxious.
It’s hard to take sides on this one. Both equally obnoxious; yes, and the irony is hilarious. Not that the Trumps will get the joke.