Mail’s hypocritical Jamal al-Harith claim – an attack on Blair for opposing Brexit?

Jamal al-Harith, a former Guantánamo Bay detainee, was reportedly paid £1m in compensation by the UK government [Image: Andy Hall for the Observer].

The fact that This Site is going to have to defend Tony Blair, after having criticised his attack on Jeremy Corbyn over Brexit, simply goes to show how fragmented politics is becoming.

Blair launched a rather futile campaign to keep ‘Remain’-supporters at odds with those who support Brexit last week, in a bid to nobble Labour’s chances of winning the by-elections in Stoke-on-Trent Central and Copeland.

But the Brextremist Daily Mail seems to have taken umbrage and launched a front-page attack on Mr Blair over the death of Jamal al-Harith, a UK subject formerly known as Ronald Fiddler, who allegedly killed himself in a suicide bombing in Iraq, earlier this month.

Fiddler/al-Harith is or was a former Guantanamo Bay detainee who was released at the request of the then-Labour government in 2004, because there was no evidence that he was an enemy combatant in the war in the Middle East that was ongoing at the time.

The Mail‘s story alleges that Labour paid him £1 million – but Mr Blair has denied this, pointing out that the money was in fact paid by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat Coalition government in 2010.

It seems to This Writer that an opportunist at the Mail saw the information that al-Harith had died in a suicide bombing and considered it a chance to smear Mr Blair in response to his anti-Brexit speech last week.

Here’s Mr Blair’s response to the story:

As you can see, the Mail did indeed report favourably on al-Harith’s release in 2004.

The UK government did indeed make a payout to the ex-Guantanamo detainees, and it was indeed made by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat Coalition – not Labour – in November 2010. It was to settle civil damages claims brought by the detainees and the conditions were subject to a legally-binding confidentiality agreement – so the amount that may have been paid to al-Harith was not known.

So the Mail‘s claims are not true.

Why publish a lie, then – if not to undermine Mr Blair’s credibility?

Source: Tony Blair attacks Daily Mail’s ‘hypocrisy’ over suicide bomber | World news | The Guardian

Join the Vox Political Facebook page.

If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!

Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:

Donate Button with Credit Cards

Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.

The Livingstone Presumption is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:


4 thoughts on “Mail’s hypocritical Jamal al-Harith claim – an attack on Blair for opposing Brexit?

    1. Mike Sivier Post author

      Remember we’re discussing the Daily Mail.
      And while we agree that Mr Blair’s credibility has been eroded beyond repair, it is just an opinion. Others may differ. The Mail‘s article would have been aimed at those people.

  1. Peter Hepworth

    Once again the Heil scoops the hypocrisy prize. PS I think it’s straying too far into conspiracy theory to suggest Blair was seeking to sabotage the byelection results. It is the duty of Remainers to seek to convert as many Brexiters as they can, in the national interest.The only justification for a Remainer to support Brexit would be a convictiion that it is the clear, unequivocal and settled view of the people. It wasn’t even that last June. Combating the folly of May’s headlong rush to catastrophe transcends party political boundaries and a couple of by-elections results are as nothing in this context (though I would love to see Labour win them on a pro-immigration platform in line with its principles).

Comments are closed.