Nobody said Hitler supported Zionism as a matter of principle, but Baddiel seems to want us to think so – he refers to Hitler writing Mein Kampf “before he went mad… so exactly in that period when he was, as we know, supporting Zionism”. Except he ONLY supported Zionism in the matter of transporting German Jews out of Germany, as was made perfectly clear to anybody with ears to listen or eyes to read. And he was only persuaded to support it by others – Hitler’s own attitude to the Haavara agreement was characterised by ambivalence until around 1937, when he is documented as having accepted it.
He says Hitler’s support of Zionism is not a fact but an “interpretation”. Wrong. It is a clear fact – in the instance mentioned. The German Zionists would not have been able to get 60,000 Jews to relative safety without that help. There was actual support for the Haavara agreement – not interpretative support (whatever that may be).
He suggests that “the forced emigration of Jews from Germany was pushed further along by various Nazi economic incentives”, which is plain wrong. German Zionists came to the Nazis with a plan to move Jews to British Mandate Palestine and the Nazis supported it because they wanted Jews out of Germany. Baddiel put the cart before the horse there.
Ken Livingstone never said Adolf Hitler supported the idea of a Jewish state. I wonder where Mr Baddiel got that idea.
And Livingstone wasn’t trying to make a point “that Zionism is bad”. He was answering a question that referred to a satirical plan to force-remove Israel (in its entirety) to the USA – and was itself a response to a genuine Israeli plan to force-remove Palestinians to Jordan, Egypt or other neighbouring Arab countries – by pointing out that the Nazis had actually gone through with such a plan.
And Baddiel uses an example of a Twitter user who doesn’t even support Livingstone’s position to support his case. Sorry, but that guy has nothing to do with any of the arguments in this case. He clearly has his own issues but there’s no reason to link them with Ken Livingstone just because his name is mentioned.
I’ll be kind, and choose to believe that Baddiel is merely misinformed, rather than having decided to fabricate a lot of nonsense.
But this is another example of an opinion-former deviating from the facts in order to skew public opinion. He should publish a correction at the very least.
The statement “Hitler supported Zionism” is not a fact. It’s an interpretation. An interpretation of a particular historical moment, in the 1930s, when the forced emigration of Jews from Germany was pushed further along by various Nazi economic incentives allowing those who fled to Palestine to get some of their stolen assets back.
That is not Adolf Hitler supporting the idea of a Jewish state (even writing that sentence looks ridiculous). It is the Nazis taking advantage of the terror and despair of fleeing refugees to get more of them to leave the country. It is just the thin edge of the wedge of Nazi horror.
the problem is that an awful lot of antisemites – often unconsciously – do conflate anti-Zionism with antisemitism. Indeed, they often just conflate Israelis with Jews. Yesterday on Twitter, a chap called Kenard told me: “Ken is an irrelevance with little influence, unlike a large number of Israeli’s [sic] who dominate the media and have done for decades.”
It seems clear what Kenard really wants to say: Jews. But because he has a vague awareness that isn’t allowed any more, he just substitutes the word Israelis. Or Israeli’s, because he doesn’t understand grammar as well as racism.
So that’s the problem with Livingstone’s statement. The interchangeability of Zionist with the word Jew means that in saying “Zionism is bad”, which is what Livingstone wants to do, he emboldens Kenard, and all those like him.
I’ll leave with the words of Adolf Hitler in Mein Kampf, before he went mad, according to Livingstone. So exactly in that period when he was, as we know, supporting Zionism.
I may have as much of a tin ear for meaning as Livingstone has for antisemitism, but I can’t, for the life of me, make this out to be as pro the idea of the creation of a Jewish state as Livingstone insists it is.
Additional: As a courtesy, I tweeted the above article to David Baddiel. Here’s his response:
I include it as an image because these things have a habit of being deleted. For now, the original is here.
You know, I was actually quite concerned about the reaction this article would get because of my experiences last year. On Twitter, might certainly makes right and I did attract the ire of people with enormous numbers of followers who also attacked me. I thought the article might attract something similar.
But to have a huge amount of careful research dismissed as “internet shite” by someone who hasn’t even taken the time to read it (and after a tweet from me that said, simply, that I wished he’d checked the facts)?
In the circumstances, I think the best reply is to note that I’m not the one who has reacted unreasonably.
Still, let’s not be overly judgemental – it’s that kind of attitude that caused the furore over Ken Livingstone’s comments in the first place. Perhaps Mr Baddiel is responding in this way because he has received more antagonistic tweets.
Maybe he’ll reconsider his position later.
Join the Vox Political Facebook page.
If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!
Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
(but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:
Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.
The Livingstone Presumption is now available
in either print or eBook format here:
Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:
The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here: