Deficit deceit: How the Tories played on your fears to needlessly harm public services
The British people have been deceived about the need for ‘austerity’ cuts to public services and benefits. The local elections on May 4 are a chance to express our anger at this huge lie. Make sure you use your vote to show your anger at this cynical manipulation by the Tory liars.
Simon Wren-Lewis re-states a valuable point in his latest Mainly Macro post – that the UK has suffered under Conservative austerity policies, not because there was a need for spending cuts but because the Tories had an excuse to impose them.
He writes:
I tend to agree with Kevin Drum in this: he says that basically politicians did what they wanted to do, and economists were simply used to provide some kind of cover for politicians’ decisions. This is the argument I make in my General Theory of Austerity paper.
The clearest case of this is probably the UK. George Osborne opposed the fiscal stimulus in 2009, and what changed is that he became Chancellor in 2010. So in this case there was no change of view, just a change in who was in power.
Professor Wren-Lewis calls the policy deficit deceit: reducing the state using fears about the deficit as a pretext.
You could perhaps argue that the Treasury and the Governor of the Bank [of England] encouraged George Osborne, but I think he would have done it anyway: he was never one to let economics get in the way of achieving a political goal.
So there you have it.
There was no economic necessity for the austerity cuts that have been imposed on the United Kingdom – no need for the cuts to benefits, most particularly for women and those with long-term illnesses and disabilities.
No need for wage restraints that have kept pay rises below the rate of inflation and put working families into poverty while employers paid themselves huge salary increases.
No need for the Bedroom Tax.
No need for cuts in Westminster government grants to devolved regional parliaments/assemblies, or to local councils.
No need for the unreasonable changes to the work capability assessment that have caused many thousands of unnecessary deaths.
No need for the provocation of hate crime against the sick, the disabled, and people from foreign countries who live and work in the UK (who, we already know, weren’t stealing our services away from us, as the Tories claimed – it was the government that was rationing those services).
It was all just a flimsy excuse to inflict harm on the most vulnerable people in the country.
And far too many of us fell for it.
How could we be so stupid?
Was it because we were conditioned to believe the lies that have been pumped out to us on a regular basis by government spokespeople who have been turned into Tory propagandists – supported by a compliant right-wing media machine?
Why did we stop thinking for ourselves and start letting these creeps do our thinking for us?
And isn’t it time we turned the tables on them?
There are local elections on May 4. You have an opportunity to make a change, at the ballot box. Don’t miss it.
Source: Henry Farrell on economists and austerity
Join the Vox Political Facebook page.
If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!
Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
(but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:
Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.
The Livingstone Presumption is now available
in either print or eBook format here:
Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:
The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:
Nothing that has happened in the economy over the last forty years has happened by accident. It is simply called Neo-Liberalism.
This phenomena has spread among right wing politicians throughout the world and repeated as though it were gospel. First appearing in 1970 in this country under the Heath government and with full force under Thatcher, which we then called Thatcherism. The architects of this wonderful vision were Friedrich Von Hayek (Austrian School) and Milton Friedman of the (Chicago School).
George Monboit has recently produced an article in the Guardian which is the most comprehensive and detailed background information relating to the origins and intent of these vile creatures who use their wealth and power to subjugate ordinary people into creating wealth for them and impoverishment to the rest of us.
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/feb/02/corporate-dark-money-power-atlantic-lobbyists-brexit
poverty is a political objective, which maintains support for financial interests of the Banks and the mega rich that make money out of money and property.
This other document which is Margaret Thatcher’s secret 1982 Cabinet papers called “the longer term options” released in 2012 under the thirty year rule, spells out in detail how the Tories would dismantle the state and hand public assets over to the private sector.
https://skwalker1964.files.wordpress.com/2016/10/cab-129-215-6.pdf
It is imperative that people understand where all this insanity comes from and so we must all do our bit by circulating this information as widely as possible, it really doesn’t have to be this way, we have the money to fund our public services and create jobs that pay real wages, but those standing in our way want us to work for nothing so that they can prosper at our expense.
The nasties like Rees-Mogg make no secret of the fact that they want the British workforce to be completely subjugated and powerless and working for peanuts, with no holiday or any other entitlements. Of course the odious Rees-Mogg will make millions out of such a society.
.i personally have been wide awake to what they have been doing for a long time and with pleasure join you and others in the fight against them with thanks
Well hopefully when the stream of foreign workers dries up we will be able to get proper recompense and benefit payments again, unfortunately the local elections will have no effect on the westminster imposed cuts, and the whole idea of having to cut the deficit was always a con because we have hardly ever not been in deficit.