The PIP lie: Benefits assessment is not about claimants’ needs – it is about CUTTING COSTS

Robert Donaldson, 66, says he has been unfairly treated by benefits assessors [Image: Daily Record].

Stories like that of Robert Donaldson are now so commonplace they are part of the furniture in modern Britain.

But that doesn’t mean they are acceptable.

The Conservative Party, in government, has always claimed that its benefit assessment systems – whether for IB, its replacement ESA, DLA or its replacement PIP – take into consideration the health and daily needs of claimants.

That claim has always been a lie.

The initials ‘PIP’ euphemistically stand for the words ‘Personal Independence Payment’. The benefit is said to be intended to allow disabled people to live independently, by covering the extra costs associated with their health conditions.

Cutting Mr Donaldson’s income by £242 clearly contradicts that!

Perhaps the benefit should be renamed ‘Starve The Disabled‘. That would be a more accurate description and the acronym – ‘STD’ – is already associated with unpleasant practices.

Perhaps the government would think twice if disabled people went around saying, “The Tories are giving me STDs”.

Here’s Mr Donaldson’s story:

An amputee pensioner with kidney failure, heart problems and hearing loss has had his benefits cut because he’s not sick enough.

Robert Donaldson has been told his £300 a week payment is being slashed to £58.

He is now frantic with worry about how he will buy food and pay his bills.

The pensioner used to receive £300 a week Disability LivingAllowance.

But that benefit is being replaced by the new Personal Independence Payment (PIP) and claimants have to undergo an assessment.

When deciding whether to grant benefits, the Department for Work and Pensions score people on how their disabilities affect their daily living needs and mobility.

To qualify for the basic living needs payment, wheelchair-bound Robert had to score eight to 10 points. He fell short by two points.

(Source: ‘I’m worrying about buying food’ Wheelchair-bound pensioner has benefits slashed by £242 a week)

ADDITIONAL: A commenter on the Vox Political Facebook page (and if you’re not subscribed to it, why not?) has reminded me that, of course, PIP costs more to administer than it saves, and the money goes to private contractors. Therefore the whole exercise is about giving public money to private business, by taking it away from taxpayers.

He’s right, although I’ll stick with my headline because the Tory plan is to cut the cost of benefit payment by ensuring the deaths of the claimants.

Join the Vox Political Facebook page.

If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!

Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:

Donate Button with Credit Cards

Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.

The Livingstone Presumption is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:


3 thoughts on “The PIP lie: Benefits assessment is not about claimants’ needs – it is about CUTTING COSTS

  1. Dez

    That is one massive drop in benefits but not clear if the orginal £300 payment was to
    pay for rent, rates, living costs additional gas, electric etc which if it was they will be miles short of the needed amount and will be causing no end of unnecessary

  2. Jenny Hambidge

    I don’t think the amounts are factually correct- PIP/DLA are not worth that amount per week at the highest rate. This spoils the validity of the argument

  3. colin perfect

    I was told to claim PIP by the DWP for help with mobility issues. Filled out the form asking for a home assessment but was refused unless they got a letter from my Doctor, which was sent to them. My claim was refused because i could not travel the 30 miles to the assessment center as i could travel the 40 yards to my Doctors. Bloody Joke

Comments are closed.