Judges say families forced into poverty by the benefit cap are not identified ‘with sufficient precision’

Last Updated: March 17, 2018By

Agony: The Tory benefit cap is intended to hurt single parents; They don’t care if it “encourages” anybody into work.

This is the problem with the fight against Tory cruelty:

Judges say single parents with a child aged less than two are not a group described “with sufficient precision” – but it is precise enough to fulfil the Tories’ purpose.

All they want is to deprive poor people of the means to survive.

They don’t actually care if this prompts the poor to get a job or not.

The idea is to hurt these people for claiming benefits that mean Tories have to pay more tax.

So thousands of people are forced into homelessness, have to visit food banks because they cannot afford the basic necessities of life –

And this proves that the Tories have wrecked the UK’s system of social security, which was intended to ensure that those necessities would be supported

– are forced to move away from their homes because they cannot afford to live there any more, or are pressured to stay with abusive partners (which encourages crime and the continuation of abuse cycles).

Tories know these are the results of their cruelty.

They are perfectly happy with such results, even though they lead to greater drains on the public purse in terms of law enforcement, social and health care.

Knowing these are the results, they continue with the policies, and defend them in the courts.

This is how we know they want to inflict this agony on people. They want the poor to suffer… for the sake of a few farthings.

Almost 20,000 single parents hit by the cruel Tory benefit cap were dealt a huge blow … as the government won a landmark case at the Court of Appeal.

The High Court had ruled the cap should not apply to single parents with a child under two – of which there were an estimated 19,700.

In a key victory last year a judge declared the cap, which limits total household benefits to £20,000 a year, was causing “real misery to no good purpose”.

But … the Court of Appeal reversed that decision and sided with the government.

Government lawyers said the original legal analysis had been “flawed in various ways” and the judge had not identified the disadvantaged group “with sufficient precision.”

The four mums involved are now set to counter-appeal in the Supreme Court.

Source: Huge blow to 20,000 parents hit by the benefit cap as Tory government wins top court appeal – Mirror Online


Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
(
but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:

Donate Button with Credit Cards

Here are four ways to be sure you’re among the first to know what’s going on.

1) Register with us by clicking on ‘Subscribe’ (in the left margin). You can then receive notifications of every new article that is posted here.

2) Follow VP on Twitter @VoxPolitical

3) Like the Facebook page at https://www.facebook.com/VoxPolitical/

Join the Vox Political Facebook page.

4) You could even make Vox Political your homepage at http://voxpoliticalonline.com

And do share with your family and friends – so they don’t miss out!

If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!

Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.


The Livingstone Presumption is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:

SWAHTprint SWAHTeBook

4 Comments

  1. Ultraviolet March 17, 2018 at 4:36 pm - Reply

    Mike,

    The judgement last year on Employment Tribunal fees gives a very good understanding of the respective positioning of the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court at the moment:

    https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/uksc-2015-0233.html

    I reckon this appeal will get a sympathetic hearing.

  2. Florence March 17, 2018 at 9:50 pm - Reply

    This keeps on happening – like the Rutherford case and others, taken through every level of the courts piling on agony to families already driven to the courts to get some relief. The DWP is not fit for purpose. Like the government that kills its own citizens.

  3. Pat Sheehan March 17, 2018 at 11:25 pm - Reply

    Millions upon millions of pounds have been spent in the courts in recent years by wealthy torys, enjoying lavish subsidy paid for by the taxpayer, to stop sick, disabled and unemployed people getting access to basic ‘welfare’ provision. The next General Election is probably our last chance to rid the UK of this tory pestilence: these tory parasites! Young voters everywhere: you need to get a grip on your lives, your futures: now!

  4. The Toffee March 18, 2018 at 10:09 am - Reply

    I’ll wager those judges that refused the appeal will no doubt become lord justices or get peerages soon enough…

Leave A Comment