Should fox hunters be protected like gays and ethnic minorities?

38 Degrees ask: should fox hunters be protected like gays and ethnic minorities | Beastrabban\’s Weblog

Really? Should fox hunters be protected like gays and ethnic minorities?

What a crazy question. Why should they be protected like something they aren’t?

I tend to agree with my brother, the Beast, who

thought the move by the foxhunting fraternity to have themselves declared a protected group bizarre and, actually, quite offensive.

Buy Cruel Britannia in print here. Buy the Cruel Britannia ebook here. Or just click on the image!

Sexuality and race or ethnicity are innate, unchanging characteristics that people can’t and don’t choose, and who have been persecuted to a greater or less extent because of them.

Foxhunting is a leisure activity. It is, as Oscar Wilde, who knew a thing or two personally about gay persecution, ‘the unspeakable in pursuit of the inedible’.

It’s a pastime that people can choose not to indulge in.

And despite the fact that there are parts of the countryside that vehemently and passionately defend foxhunting, there are other country people, including farmers, who hate it and the people who practise it.

A foxhunter off with his hounds in hunting pink has absolutely nothing in common with the gay men who were jailed for their sexuality before it was decriminalised and who may still be abused and assaulted today.

Or Roma, Jews, Blacks, Asians and Muslims, who may also be beaten up and insulted for their race or religion.

It seems a pro fox-hunting group really is currently preparing a legal case to prove hunters should be protected by law, arguing that fox hunters should be classed as an ethnic minority under equality laws and have the same protections as the Roma community or LGBTQ+ groups.

If you want to register your own opinion on this matter, visit 38 Degrees Ask Their Supporters If Foxhunters Should Be Protected Like Gays and Ethnic Minorities | Beastrabban\’s Weblog


Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
(
but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:

Donate Button with Credit Cards

Be among the first to know what’s going on! Here are the ways to manage it:

1) Register with us by clicking on ‘Subscribe’ (bottom right of the home page). You can then receive notifications of every new article that is posted here.

2) Follow VP on Twitter @VoxPolitical

3) Like the Facebook page at https://www.facebook.com/VoxPolitical/

Join the Vox Political Facebook page.

4) You could even make Vox Political your homepage at http://voxpoliticalonline.com

5) Join the uPopulus group at https://upopulus.com/groups/vox-political/

6) Join the MeWe page at https://mewe.com/p-front/voxpolitical

7) Feel free to comment!

And do share with your family and friends – so they don’t miss out!

If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!

Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.

Cruel Britannia is available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

The Livingstone Presumption is available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:

SWAHTprint SWAHTeBook

2 Comments

  1. El Dee August 22, 2024 at 1:34 pm - Reply

    For them this is a win/win. If they were to win this point then they are protected against ‘prejudice’ If they don’t win (by far much more likely) they get to make a mockery of the whole ‘wokeness’ idea of having protected categories. Other similar nonsense is being tried elsewhere..

  2. Martyn August 26, 2024 at 7:09 am - Reply

    hunting for ‘sport’should be banned… The vermin are the hunters that just love killing our wildlife..

Leave A Comment