Tories won’t keep their election promises – so why should we swear to support their values?
They cannot be trusted to keep their own election promises, so they have no right to ask us to keep any promises – especially promises they want to force us to make. We would be well within our rights to ignore whatever was said.
For holders of political office, this is doubly true. Nobody belonging to another political party could possibly accept being held to a Conservative Party definition of British values, because their definition is – by definition – different.
This is another non-starter from Sajid Javid, the man who – as Business Secretary – famously failed to re-start the UK’s industry. Rather than fight for our steelworks, he went to a party in Australia.
Surely no season calls for the nation to unite and put its ugly squabbles behind itself more than this one. Sajid Javid has the answer: he doesn’t want a “government-approved, one-size-fits-all identity”, which is fortunate, since the spirit recoils at the identity the government would approve. But he does want to establish some “building blocks of society”, which will involve, in the first place, requiring the holders of public office to swear some oaths of allegiance to British values. “Tolerating the views of others, even if you disagree with them” is the one that would cause the immediate problem for the prime minister, who finds many views, even her own of six months ago, utterly intolerable.She would also struggle with Javid’s proposed oath of “respect for the law, even if you think the law is an ass”. Isn’t Theresa May explicitly at war with the law in styling herself for a hypothetical snap election, according to leaks, as the “people versus the judges” candidate?
And the oath of “believing in freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom from abuse …” would arguably entail, from the prime minister, her cabinet, her party and her Ukip fellow travellers, a rather more rigorous rejection of Islamophobia, so that Muslim women in shopping centres didn’t have to be dragged along the ground by their hijabs in a newly emboldened climate of “saying the unsayable”. Finally Javid has in mind allegiance to “a belief in equality, democracy and the democratic process”, that quintessentially British principle to which almost the entire world at least claims to subscribe.
Join the Vox Political Facebook page.
If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!
Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
(but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:
Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.
The Livingstone Presumption is now available
in either print or eBook format here:
Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:
The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:
I would Never pledge an oath allegiance to the queen, never mind these homicidal, evil subhumans. I didn’t ask to be born and I really wish I hadn’t been!!!
Never heard of racist vans, are ford and renault worried after all due to eu membership we lost erf foden leyland albion aec dennis albion guy atkinson scammel dodge and bedford so is it anther foreign make like mercedes?
More hogwash from the Leave propaganda machine. Firms went out of business, but it was nothing to do with the EU (which did not exist at the time most of these went under).
Stop your scaremongering and learn something!
‘National Institutionalisation’ – The obsessive obedience by a country’s population to a political ideology, despite all Facts and Morality. – Kanjin Tor
Mendacity is a system that we live in. Liquor is one way out and death’s the other. Tennessee Williams
This is really all about Tory “values” and nothing more. Flag waving, keeping the Windsor dynasty in the lap of double luxury and dreaming of a lost Empire. All designed to keep people in their place and ensure that power and money remains in the hands of the aristocratic and monied classes.