Share this post:
Just days after Vox Political published a 5,000-word plan to fix the asylum system, the government has suddenly announced… a plan to fix the asylum appeals system.
Home Secretary Yvette Cooper now admits that delays in appeals are “unacceptable” and has promised a new, independent panel of adjudicators to hear cases more quickly.
If that seems familiar, it should. This Site’s plan set out the case for a “decision surge” — hiring and training decision-makers and tribunal capacity to clear claims faster, including appeals.
That’s the lever that collapses demand for so-called “asylum hotels”, because right now it takes more than a year to hear an appeal and 51,000 cases are stuck in the pipeline.
So: credit where it’s due — but let’s be clear about what this move isn’t.
-
It isn’t a full fix. Appeals are only one bottleneck. Without more capacity for initial decisions, housing, and returns agreements, hotels will still fill up.
-
It isn’t transparent. This Site called for a public scoreboard — weekly intake v outputs, hotel headcounts, costs — independently validated. Cooper hasn’t offered that.
-
And it isn’t proof against spin. A new “independent body” risks being another layer of bureaucracy unless it’s properly staffed and funded.
Meanwhile, the Conservatives are shouting “chaos” while quietly encouraging councils to block hotels — with no answer to the question of where people go instead.
Reform UK shouts “mass deportations” that have no basis in law or capacity.
The truth is simple: you don’t drain hotels with slogans; you drain them with throughput.
Appeals reform is a start, but unless Cooper takes on the rest of the system, this looks like politics first, competence second.
Still — let’s not ignore the timing.
Vox Political published a plan on Tuesday; the government shifted by Saturday. You decide whether that’s coincidence.
Share this post:
Vox Political called it – now the government is scrambling to fix asylum appeals
Share this post:
Just days after Vox Political published a 5,000-word plan to fix the asylum system, the government has suddenly announced… a plan to fix the asylum appeals system.
Home Secretary Yvette Cooper now admits that delays in appeals are “unacceptable” and has promised a new, independent panel of adjudicators to hear cases more quickly.
If that seems familiar, it should. This Site’s plan set out the case for a “decision surge” — hiring and training decision-makers and tribunal capacity to clear claims faster, including appeals.
That’s the lever that collapses demand for so-called “asylum hotels”, because right now it takes more than a year to hear an appeal and 51,000 cases are stuck in the pipeline.
So: credit where it’s due — but let’s be clear about what this move isn’t.
It isn’t a full fix. Appeals are only one bottleneck. Without more capacity for initial decisions, housing, and returns agreements, hotels will still fill up.
It isn’t transparent. This Site called for a public scoreboard — weekly intake v outputs, hotel headcounts, costs — independently validated. Cooper hasn’t offered that.
And it isn’t proof against spin. A new “independent body” risks being another layer of bureaucracy unless it’s properly staffed and funded.
Meanwhile, the Conservatives are shouting “chaos” while quietly encouraging councils to block hotels — with no answer to the question of where people go instead.
Reform UK shouts “mass deportations” that have no basis in law or capacity.
The truth is simple: you don’t drain hotels with slogans; you drain them with throughput.
Appeals reform is a start, but unless Cooper takes on the rest of the system, this looks like politics first, competence second.
Still — let’s not ignore the timing.
Vox Political published a plan on Tuesday; the government shifted by Saturday. You decide whether that’s coincidence.
Share this post:
you might also like
Latest DWP outrage: cold calls with ‘take it or leave it’ offer for reduced benefits
DWP hires opinion poll firm to survey benefit claimants who challenge decisions. Why?
Benefit tribunals: appellants are warned if their hearing is by video link, their home becomes part of the court