Hacking trial: what did Cameron really know?
I suggested yesterday that a Prime Minister in a precarious position might find it handy to have someone who knows how to hack a phone on his payroll. Smiling Carcass agrees.
Do you?
I suggested yesterday that a Prime Minister in a precarious position might find it handy to have someone who knows how to hack a phone on his payroll. Smiling Carcass agrees.
Do you?
Here here my thoughts entirely and I would love to find out what IDS has on Cameron
spot on
Isn’t it strange that at the last general election Cameron seemed to be always one step ahead of Brown throughout his election campaign? Just a thought….
I echo Mr Angry’s reply, i would say that he knew and that an employee with such a skill would be a very useful asset.
[…] Hacking trial: what did Cameron really know?. […]
The conspiracist in me believes that Cameron deliberately sabotaged the second set of charges against Coulson because they carried a far heavier sentence than the hacking charges and Coulson promised to reveal all if he did not.
We now know that even if Coulson was an exception on DV, to predecessors and those following, the fact that his deputy was DV vetted makes it inevitable that he was given exemptions because of the things that DV would have revealed.
I think that at least some of the 200 plus being taken to trial will spill the beans over the next two years and this has a long long way to run yet.
Me too.
Btw, the me too comment was in answer to Mr Angry.