Labour pledges to stem women’s refuge closures – kittysjones


Thanks to kittysjones for reposting this article by Yvette Cooper:

Theresa May and the Home Office are turning a blind eye to the crisis in safe haven provision caused by public service cuts

‘Today, on the International Day for the Elimination of Violence Against Women, I am deeply worried that the clock is being turned back.’ 

A few weeks ago an emergency housing officer made a late night call to the domestic violence helpline run by Women’s Aid and Refuge. He was trying to find refuge accommodation for Violet (names in this piece have been changed), a 19-year-old who had escaped abuse with her twin babies. She had nowhere else to turn.

There was refuge space for Violet and her children in a neighbouring county, far from her abuser, where she would be safe. However, a new rule capped the number of women they could take from outside their area. The bed was left empty and they turned her away.

Today, on the International Day for the Elimination of Violence Against Women, as I hear more stories like Violet’s, I am deeply worried that the clock is being turned back. Instead of the improvements we need in the criminal justice system and local services, the opposite is happening. As home secretary, Theresa May’s policies are letting women down, and it’s time for urgent change.

Shockingly, the national network of refuges is starting to crumble before our eyes. Britain was one of the first countries to pioneer safe houses for those fleeing violence. More than a million women and hundreds of thousands of men experience domestic violence every year. And women can be at greatest risk when they make the brave decision to leave. Refuges provide a vital safe haven with expert support and sanctuary to help families get back on their feet and start rebuilding their lives.

That network is now under terrible strain. Women’s Aid estimates that 155 women and 103 children are turned away from refuges every day. And services are closing. Many are using their reserve funding to stay open and some areas have no refuge provision left at all. In the face of big budget cuts, some councils have brought in the “local connections” rule to ring-fence their funding for local women. Yet this is putting more women at risk.

Lorna is convinced that moving saved her life. She suffered persistent beatings and sexual abuse by her partner. Her employer helped her move to another branch of the business in another town without telling anyone where she had gone. But she couldn’t have managed it without temporary supportive accommodation near the other branch office. Violet and her twins did not have the same option. They were forced to take emergency accommodation in the very area she was trying to flee from.

Specialist support is being lost too. Some areas are only funding generic accommodation or help in victims’ own homes – ending the expert support and sanctuary that some families need.

So what is the Home Office doing about it? Where are the national standards? What is Theresa May doing to protect women’s safety? Or to make sure that local councils work together so women’s safety isn’t disproportionately hit?

Too often this government is just turning a blind eye. What is happening to refuges reflects a wider and deeper problem. Labour’s women’s safety commission has been gathering evidence from across the country, and time and again it has heard that women’s safety is being hit disproportionately and justice is being undermined. The proportion of rape and domestic violence cases reaching prosecution is falling, not rising. Specialist prosecutors for rape have been cut back, domestic violence courts are closing, and specialist police officers are overstretched. Mothers fleeing violence are struggling to get legal aid. Families with police-backed security and panic rooms at home are being charged the bedroom tax and told to move.

Yet amazingly, the government has no idea of the cumulative impact their policies are having on women’s safety, because they haven’t carried out a proper audit in the face of huge upheaval. Lack of Home Office interest or intervention and lack of national standards at a time of big budget cuts, are letting women down.

A Labour government would use £3m of the savings made from abolishing police and crime commissioners to set up a national refuge fund and we will continue national support for rape crisis centres too. We will bring in new local and national standards for policing, prosecutions and support services and a new national commissioner to make sure standards are met, as well as strengthening the law. And perhaps most important of all, we will insist on action to prevent violence in the next generation. This government has voted repeatedly to block our proposal for compulsory sex and relationship education to teach zero tolerance of violence in relationships among growing girls and boys.

Across the world, other governments, charities, criminal justice organisations, councils and community campaigners are marking 16 days of action to eliminate violence against women. It is time our government stopped turning its back and did far more to keep women safe.

See also:

“The report highlights the key areas where women’s rights in the UK have come to a standstill and in fact some are being reversed” – UK Government still in breach of the human rights convention on gender discrimination.

Welfare reforms and the language of flowers: the Tory gender agenda.

Follow me on Twitter: @MidWalesMike

Join the Vox Political Facebook page.

Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:

Donate Button with Credit Cards

Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
bringing you the best of the blogs!

Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:


7 thoughts on “Labour pledges to stem women’s refuge closures – kittysjones

  1. joanna may

    Did you know that if UC is rolled out there will also be a lot of cases of economic abuse? As UC is to be paid in one payment to the head of each household, it is likely that the abused partner will suffer even more degradation and humiliation, than they already suffer, both money and food could be withheld from the victim, causing much more trauma, and nowhere to turn to. IDS will be committing even more indirect Murders!!!

  2. Guy Ropes

    I signed an on-line petition initiated by one of the Action groups in respect of refuges for women and have received notification in the past couple of days that after presenting the petition to Downing Street, the coalition have promised to ear-mark a considerable amount to set up new refuges. No doubt you will be aware of this (surely?). Did you not sign the petition? If not I’ll dig out the e-mail and give you chapter and verse. As I said at a local Labour Party meeting only a couple of weeks ago, if Political groupings don’t up their game soon, 38 degrees, Avaaz et al will be running for office in 2020. Can’t wait.

    1. Mike Sivier Post author

      Would this be the Women’s Aid ‘Save Refuges, Save Lives’ petition? Last I heard, the only party to out-and-out support the campaign was Labour.

  3. Guy Ropes

    The details are as follow: £10 million has been pledged to national refuges as a result (apparently) of the handing in of the petition as stated in my previous post. The campaign was called SOS Save Refuges, Save lives. This was a 38 degrees petition supported via campaigns for you

    1. Mike Sivier Post author

      I found the information on the Women’s Aid site. Looks very nice. Reading this article again, it seems entirely possible that the Coalition can put up this money without addressing the issues raised by Yvette Cooper.

  4. Guy Ropes

    If that’s the case then Yvette Cooper can make a name for herself. Let’s hear her. BTW If Labour were the only party to out-and-out support this initiative, why isn’t she (and others from Labour) publicly associated with it? Only asking

    1. Mike Sivier Post author

      In order not to dissuade supporters of other parties from supporting the campaign, perhaps?

Comments are closed.