Poll: Almost nobody would support a military coup against Jeremy Corbyn

Jeremy-Corbyn-009
Does anybody else find it more than a little strange that a military coup against a democratically-elected political leader can be even considered, here in the United Kingdom?

And what about the fact that this suggestion was made about a political leader whose mandate from his membership was overwhelming?

If a military coup was within the bounds of reason here, surely it should be directed against the Conservatives, whose wafer-thin majority was based on the votes of just 24 per cent of the population and built on a tissue of lies.

There would be very little support for a military coup if Jeremy Corbyn won the next election, a poll has found.

An unnamed British army general told the Sunday Times newspaper last month that the Labour leader could face a “munity” from senior military officers, “by whatever means possible, fair or foul”.

But a YouGov poll found that only nine per cent of the population would be sympathetic to a coup if Mr Corbyn became Prime Minister.

Source: Almost nobody would support a military coup against Jeremy Corbyn, poll finds | UK Politics | News | The Independent

Join the Vox Political Facebook page.

If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!

Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
(
but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:

Donate Button with Credit Cards

Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.

Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:

SWAHTprint SWAHTeBook

8 thoughts on “Poll: Almost nobody would support a military coup against Jeremy Corbyn

  1. ian725

    I do not believe that a sane British General or Admiral would even countenance such a move. That would mean a Queens Commissioned Offer has mutinied against his own head of state … The Queen ….. unthinkable balderdash.

  2. gfranklinpercival

    We had all this in Wilson’s time as party leader and later as pm. It becomes tedious. There is a far larger number of us than there is of them. Armed, trained men have no choice but to die when confronted by determined masses. If you doubt my word, I offer this link:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fhfgQOLSrTQ

  3. chriskitcher

    More importantly what is the SoS for Defence, or is it War now, doing about seeking out and sacking these terrorists that are in the ranks of the military extablishment?

  4. Martin Odoni

    In fact, I’m frightened that as many as 9% of the country are so blinkered in their selfish anti-Leftism that they would support the destruction of their democratic rights, ahead of accepting the leadership of a man who simply thinks we should try being nicer to each other for once.

  5. John Gaines

    Yeah, yeah…we had that nonsense against Dear Old Harold:
    But new revelations in BBC drama documentary The Plot Against Harold Wilson, to be broadcast next Thursday, suggest the Labour prime minister was also convinced he was the target of plans to stage a military coup – and that the Royal Family backed it…

    No not The Royal Family, Mountbatten had a relative in the Palace which we all know, and his Military connections were the military screwballs and wasters..British Forces serve the Crown. not political shysters such as the Tories.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/4789060.stm

  6. Dez

    At this point in time there would be a lot more support for a coup against Camoron and his gangster chums

  7. NMac

    Some reactionaries only put up with democracy when it gives them the result which they want, and to achieve that result they will lie through their teeth.

Comments are closed.