Benefits claimants are subjected to an ‘amateurish, secret penal system which is more severe than the mainstream judicial system’, writes Dr David Webster of the University of Glasgow.
Few people know that the number of financial penalties (‘sanctions’) imposed on benefit claimants by the Department of Work and Pensions now exceeds the number of fines imposed by the courts.
In Great Britain in 2013, there were 1,046,398 sanctions on Jobseeker’s Allowance claimants, 32,128 on Employment and Support Allowance claimants, and approximately 44,000 on lone parent recipients of Income Support. By contrast, Magistrates’ and Sheriff courts imposed a total of only 849,000 fines.
Sanctioned benefit claimants are treated much worse than those fined in the courts. The scale of penalties is more severe (£286.80 – £11,185.20 compared to £200 – £10,000).
Most sanctions are applied to poor people and involve total loss of benefit income.
Although there is a system of discretionary ‘hardship payments’, claimants are often reduced to hunger and destitution by the ban on application for the first two weeks and by lack of information about the payments and the complexity of the application process. The hardship payment system itself is designed to clean people out of resources; all savings or other sources of assistance must be used up before help is given.
Decisions on guilt are made in secret by officials who have no independent responsibility to act lawfully; since the Social Security Act 1998 they have been mere agents of the Secretary of State.
These officials are currently subject to constant management pressure to maximise penalties, and as in any secret system there is a lot of error, misconduct, dishonesty and abuse.
Source: Benefit sanctions: Britain’s secret penal system – Dr David Webster | Politics and Insights – and you are strongly encouraged to read the rest of the article and pass it on.
Join the Vox Political Facebook page.
If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!
Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
(but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:
Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.
Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:
The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:
It isn’t Great Britain any more Mike, on many levels!!!!
Sanctions, therefore, contravene the fundamental human right to a fair trial, under Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights: the determination of culpability is not held in public, the “judge” is not independent, there is no presumption of innocence, the accused is not able to confront the evidence and there is no way for the claimant to defend himself / herself against the allegations.
Couldn’t a claimant, using a legal team working pro bono, take the Secretary of State to court in a judicial review and, if needs be, to take the matter to the ECHR?
That would indeed be poetic.
Cant afford to top up salary packets all the time
They seem to manage to top up executive salaries just as much as they like.
This is brilliant! We need to stand up to the bullying that underlies this unjust nonsense that has been creeping up in the last 25 years.
I think armed with these statistics we can challenge every decision made. We need to tackle our MP’s of every colour and shade and get this stopped.
Check out my successful JSA Sanctions Appeal on fb at #DansLaMerde.