Bombing Syria won’t solve terrorism – we need to out-THINK the murderers

Even if ‘Mad Nad’ gets her wish and an early vote takes place, the result should remain the same.

Bombing Syria indiscriminately will do Daesh (let’s not dignify these people with the name they’ve chosen for themselves) more good than harm, encouraging more young recruits to rally to the terrorists’ cause.

The British security services and armed forces need to be cleverer than that; they need to out-think the murderers and undermine their support base.

Oh, but I know what people are thinking.

Bombing is so much easier.

Tory MP Nadine Dorries has called for MPs to vote on whether to bomb ISIS targets in Syria.

The outspoken backbencher called for a Commons vote to authorise air strikes no later than Monday.

Source: Paris attacks: Tory MP calls for vote on bombing ISIS targets in Syria – Mirror Online

Join the Vox Political Facebook page.

If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!

Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
(
but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:

Donate Button with Credit Cards

Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.

Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:

SWAHTprint SWAHTeBook

Related posts

6 Thoughts to “Bombing Syria won’t solve terrorism – we need to out-THINK the murderers”

  1. Pitty we turned our back on Russia when they wanted us to help shows how sick we are and up the US back passage

  2. Brian

    ” (let’s not dignify these people with the name they’ve chosen for themselves)”

    Daesh, why Daesh? They ARE Islamic Extremist, (the clue’s in the name!) trying to break the religious link with these ‘people’ is just diverting the cause of their existence. Muddying the waters will not persuade anyone affected by these atrocities to change opinion because you change the terms of reference. Call a spade a spade, and face the truth.

    1. Mike Sivier

      I am calling them what they are.
      If you would prefer to use the name they have chosen for themselves, what does that say about you?

  3. Follow the money! Thats what we should be doing.ISIS or whatever it is called has billions of dollars sqirrelled away in accounts across the world thanks to money laundering and the ability to “wire” money across the globe with ease. But money talks and getting co-operation to pursue this course of action is unacceptable. Droppings bombs is more visual and doesn’t destabilise the money market. God Bless America!

  4. I’m not Peter Hitchens’ biggest fan. But he says exactly the same thing in a most intelligent article on the subject – that we should THINK before acting with knee-jerk responses, and that by so doing we will come around to seeing how we can best undermine these grotesque jihadis.

    1. Mike Sivier

      Yes, I’ve reblogged it.

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this:

By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. This includes scrolling or continued navigation. more information

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.

Close