Why has the government been lying to us about the effect of Cameron’s migrant ’emergency brake’?

David Cameron had claimed that 40% of recently arrived EU migrants were dependent on benefits. In fact the total is less than three per cent. [Image: Andy Rain/EPA.]

We all know the answer to the question – to make it seem that David Cameron has done something effective when he has not.

As with so many other statements made by the Cameron government, the ’emergency brake’ has been stopped in its tracks – with facts gained from an unwilling HMRC.

It seems that, instead of affecting 148,000 people, this ’emergency brake’ would in fact affect 84,000 migrant families.

Even then, “migrant families” include families in which one parent and the children may be UK citizens, meaning many of the 84,000 who would be affected are from this country.

Perhaps most damningly, the total number of EU migrants living in the UK in the first quarter of last year was around three million. The number of migrants affected by this ’emergency brake’ isn’t 40 per cent of that total (1,200,000). It isn’t even four per cent; it’s 2.8 per cent. And many of them are UK citizens.

Any claim that this part of Cameron’s ‘deal’ will have any tangible effect on inward migration from the EU is nonsense.

Furthermore, let’s pay the attention it deserves to the fact that HMRC did not willingly honour the Guardian‘s Freedom of Information request, and only surrendered the facts under orders from the Information Commissioner (as the DWP did with my FoI request on benefit claimant deaths).

In both cases, it seems the government departments concerned were more interested in hiding the facts, for the benefit of the Conservative Government, than in freedom of information. That is not the purpose of the Freedom of Information Act.

FoI procedures are currently under review.

It is clear from the evidence we have that the rules need to be strengthened in the public’s favour, rather than that of the government.

These bureaucrats are meddling with our right to the facts.

A total of 84,000 EU migrant families on tax credits would have been affected by David Cameron’s “emergency brake” if it had been introduced four years ago, official figures reveal.

The number – released by HMRC six months after it was first requested by the Guardian – appears far smaller than had been suggested by the prime minister in previous public statements justifying the plan.

Cameron had appeared to indicate that many more families would be affected. Speaking in the Commons on Wednesday, he claimed 40% of EU migrants coming to Britain access the in-work benefits system. A briefing from Number 10 and given to the Times [paywall] in November said this amounted to 148,000 people.

At the time, the government refused to explain the way the figures – given to the Times and provided by the DWP – had been calculated or give a detailed breakdown. The UK statistics authority said the way those figures were presented by the DWP was “unsatisfactory”.

Jonathan Portes, principal research fellow at the National Institute of Economic and Social Research, said: “This new data shows that the prime minister’s claim that 40% of recently arrived European migrants were dependent on benefits was at best selective and misleading.”

A second set of figures – also obtained on Thursday four months after they were first requested – show that one in 10 “migrant couples” on tax credits actually include one UK national. HMRC considers a family to be an EU migrant family when at least one member of that family is a migrant from elsewhere in the EU.

Given this broad definition, it remains unclear how many British nationals and their children could be hit by an emergency brake targeted at “migrant families”.

Source: Revealed: tax credit data exposes limits of Cameron’s ’emergency brake’ | Politics | The Guardian

Join the Vox Political Facebook page.

If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!

Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:

Donate Button with Credit Cards

Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.

Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:


4 thoughts on “Why has the government been lying to us about the effect of Cameron’s migrant ’emergency brake’?

  1. Terry Davies

    Its clear , metaphorically Cameron thinks he has found snow and is trying to sell it to eskimos who dont believe it is snow!!! Thus his need to save face and try to sell the ‘snow’ to Parliamentary advocates who share opinions of eskimos but from a differing perspective.

  2. mohandeer

    The TV has been repeating one of the series of Benefits scroungers. One of the claimants is a Bulgarian who claims dole and has a side line in scrap metal and openly admits that he will steal to get what he wants. Another family is a Polish chap working in Bristol on £18,000 a year while Britain sends his wife and son in Warsaw £224 per month. This is deliberate propaganda by the TV station involved since examples like this lead to accusations by the British watchers, that the migrants are “all at it”. It is neither representative of the majority no demonstrates the failure of the Tory government to provide decent wages for people to be able to get by without making in work benefit claims and housing benefit.
    Cameron needs to invest in people and businesses (instead of handing “gifts” to the already rich) and chase down money the British people are owed which costs the taxpayers billions out of their poorly waged pockets. The progressive and regressive taxes need to be assigned fairly and multi million pound “bonuses” need to be included under taxation laws. If these examples alone were followed the migrant issue would not be an issue, if only people could be made to understand this. None of our present difficulties are as a result of migrants but solely the consequence of Osborne’s inept and unworkable austerity fixation.

Comments are closed.