Failed NEC candidate has been asking local Labour parties to exclude members from leader nomination votes


Here in Wales, Blaenau Gwent is the only Constituency Labour Party to have nominated Owen Smith for the party leadership – by underhand means.

CLPs are allowed to organise their constituency meetings along two lines – as all-member or delegate-only meetings. If Blaenau Gwent had held its nomination meeting in the same way as all the others, there would be nothing to say about it.

But that isn’t what happened.

Last year, that constituency nominated Jeremy Corbyn after an all-member meeting; this year, the meeting was restricted to delegates and Owen Smith got the nod.

Senior figures in the constituency party had decided that only delegates would be able to vote – and the ballot would be secret.

Knowing that, take a look at the following email from failed right-wing candidate in the recent National Executive Committee elections, Luke Akehurst:

160815 Akehurst email

The image was provided by fellow blogger Steve Walker, who provides the following illumination in his blog:

Luke Akehurst, bastion of Progress (the shadowy ‘party within a party’ promoting right-wing views in the Labour party), avowed opponent of Jeremy Corbyn and failed 2016 NEC candidate (who still sees fit to call Corbyn ‘unelectable’), has been writing to CLPs reminding them that the party’s rules give them an option to exclude constituency membership from the nomination ballot.

He also suggests that they may not wish to have a ballot at all in case it’s ‘divisive’ – reading between the lines, he seems to be suggesting that constituency execs should arrange nominations for Smith by excluding the membership and that if it doesn’t think it can win the nomination process even via that option, they shouldn’t have one.

Considering that Mr Akehurst, as his own blog details, holds no official position in the national party that would entitle or require him to be contacting CLPs to advise them on the rules regarding ballots, Smith’s supporters are extremely desperate to ensure that the nomination numbers don’t humiliate their candidate.

The numbers do humiliate Mr Smith. His CLP support is only a fraction of that won by Jeremy Corbyn.

And who knows how many nominations were gained in the underhand way suggested by the underhand Mr Akehurst?

This leadership election is shaping up to be less a choice between two left-wing politicians and more a battle between good and evil.

Source: Luke Akehurst encouraging CLPs to exclude members from leadership nomination votes | The SKWAWKBOX Blog


Join the Vox Political Facebook page.

If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!

Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:

Donate Button with Credit Cards

Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.

Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:


7 thoughts on “Failed NEC candidate has been asking local Labour parties to exclude members from leader nomination votes

  1. John

    Akehurst should be kicked out of the Labour Party. His machinations bring the party into disrepute and his actions are clearly not just anti-Corbyn (which he is entitled to be) but also – and far more importantly – anti-Labour. Entryists like him should be shown the door – for ever.

      1. Brenda Addison

        To my mind, Labour First is ‘old labour’ associated with the right wing unions in the Midlands. Progress is ‘new labour’. Labour First is quite strong in the West Midlands where I live. Sure they collaborate with Progress on certain things, but they have their own national annual conference (in Tipton this year) and organisational structures. They favoured Tom Watson for Deputy Leader. However, I’m no expert. You’d have to confirm this with your own sources and research.

Comments are closed.