Right-wing paper shows how REAL anti-Semitism is perpetrated

Last Updated: July 30, 2017By

Kevin Myers [Image: Irish Times].

Look at that! All the strident whining about anti-Semitism having found a home on the Left has just been shattered by a puff of reality.

No doubt it will be back as soon as its proponents have recovered, but Kevin Myers’s article in the Irish edition of the Sunday Times really is the kind of showstopper that could shut down the whole argument altogether.

This is a right-wing Holocaust denier, writing stereotypical fact-free anti-Semitic comments, in a Conservative-supporting newspaper run by Rupert Murdoch.

There is no ambiguity about it – no room for argument, as there has been in my own case, or those of Ken Livingstone, Jackie Walker or any of the other Lefties who have been maligned by (right-wing) crusaders claiming to be fighting anti-Semitism.

The article, headlined Sorry ladies, equal pay has to be earned, states: “I note that two of the best-paid women presenters in the BBC – Claudia Winkleman and Vanessa Feltz, with whose, no doubt, sterling work I am tragically unacquainted – are Jewish. Good for them.

“Jews are not generally noted for their insistence on selling their talent for the lowest possible price, which is the most useful measure there is of inveterate, lost-with-all-hands stupidity. I wonder, who are their agents? If they’re the same ones that negotiated the pay for the women on the lower scales, then maybe the latter have found their true value in the marketplace.”

While it may be true that Ms Winkleman and Ms Feltz are Jewish, and highly-paid (these facts being, respectively, public knowledge and revealed by the BBC recently), the remaining assertions have no basis in reality, other than in the fevered brains of anti-Semites like Mr Myers.

The claim that Jews demand higher pay than their worth is a pillar of anti-Semitic belief. The inference that they have done so, in this instance, for that reason, is at best a distortion of the facts and at worst an outright lie.

Oh, and the swipe at women in general – claiming that they may deserve to be lower-paid than men – is just plain, old-fashioned mysogyny.

Apparently the article is full of it, but it’s behind a paywall. I’m having to settle for pulling quotes from the Wikipedia article about this controversy, such as: “Is it because men are more charismatic performers? Because they work harder? Because they are more driven? Possibly a bit of each”. He also claimed men may be paid more because they “work harder, get sick less frequently and seldom get pregnant”.

The article prompted a storm of protest, resulting first in an apology from News UK, publishers of the Irish edition of the Sunday Times:

Then came the announcement that Mr Myers has been fired as a columnist for the newspaper:


Finally – an apropos of nothing much, it seems – we learned that his nickname at the Irish Independent was “My Arse”:

(I mention that as light relief because there’s very little of it coming up.)

Unfortunately for the fight against anti-Semitism, the article attracted the attention of the so-called Campaign Against Antisemitism, an organisation that more commonly targets people who make legitimate criticism of the state of Israel and smears them with accusations that they hate Jews. I have experienced this scurrilous and disreputable tactic firsthand.

It also handles some cases of actual anti-Semitism, such as this. I’ll not comment on whether this is because the transgression is so obvious it can’t be ignored.

The CAA demanded an investigation and apology from the Irish Sunday Times – which would be fine, if the tactics employed by Mr Myers were not so similar to those employed by that organisation.

I’m sure you all remember the CAA’s article about me, in which it was stated: “He writes prolifically on issues relating to Zionism and Jews and is an ardent defender of members of the Labour Party who are suspended or expelled over allegations of antisemitism. He has defended Jackie Walker, particularly for her comments that Jews were the chief financiers of the the slave trade. He endorses the views and cross-posts the writing of Tony Greenstein.

“Concerning the late Tam Dalyell’s comment that Tony Blair may have been “unduly influenced…by a cabal of Jewish advisers”, Mr Sivier suggests that this may have been “entirely justified”. He has defended some of the antisemitic tweets of Naz Shah, despite that MP accepting that what she had said was indeed antisemitic. He has asserted that the Socialist Workers’ Party’s omission of Jews from a list of victims of the Holocaust may have been “politically correct” and defended NUS President Malia Bouattia’s reference to the “Zionist-led media”. He regularly accuses Jews and others who point to antisemitism in his Party of acting in bad faith.

“In fact, it seems there are virtually no allegedly antisemitic incidents or individuals on the Left that Mike Sivier has not either defended or supported.”

All of the above claims are either lies or distortions, based on half-truths. There is not a single accurate fact there at all.

I wrote an article that addressed and dismissed all the issues raised by the CAA, and I strongly advise you to read it for yourself.

It is sad that such hypocrites put themselves forward as defenders and representatives of Jewish people, and cynical that they would exploit an obvious case of anti-Semitism like that of Kevin Myers to legitimise their own unacceptable – and similar – behaviour.

Fortunately – at least regarding Mr Myers – we may turn to more acceptable opinions:



Here are four ways to be sure you’re among the first to know what’s going on.

1) Register with us by clicking on ‘Subscribe’ (in the left margin). You can then receive notifications of every new article that is posted here.

2) Follow VP on Twitter @VoxPolitical

3) Like the Facebook page at https://www.facebook.com/VoxPolitical/

Join the Vox Political Facebook page.

4) You could even make Vox Political your homepage at http://voxpoliticalonline.com

And do share with your family and friends – so they don’t miss out!

If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!

Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:

Donate Button with Credit Cards

Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.

The Livingstone Presumption is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:


One Comment

  1. Owen Williams July 30, 2017 at 7:57 pm - Reply

    If the Irish Sunday Times feels so embarrassed about the response that they not only issued an apology for the article, but actually sacked the arseclown who wrote it, it does beg the question of why they allowed such rancid tripe to get past the editor in the first place, doesn’t it?

    It’s one of the first moral lessons we’re taught as children — “If I do this, will I get in trouble for it?” If the answer is such a resounding YES that you know you’ll not only be made to issue an apology to those your actions have affected, but will be punished profusely besides, then it’s common sense to just not bloody do it in the first place! ¬_¬

Leave A Comment

you might also like