The battle against anti-Semitism is wrapped up with aggressive Zionism, not bigots like Kevin Myers

Alan Hart: His book suggests the real way to fight anti-Semitism is by defeating aggressive, nationalist Zionism.

With anti-Semitism on the rise again in countries around the world, a book written more than a decade ago seems to provide the reason.

Entitled Zionism: The Real Enemy of the Jews, BBC and ITN reporter Alan Hart’s book was published in 2005, and suggests that anti-Semitism is on the rise because of the abhorrent behaviour of aggressive – or, as he describes it, nationalist – Zionists in Israel.

This Writer reckons it is worth reminding people of this, on the day Holocaust denier Kevin Myers was sacked as an Irish Sunday Times columnist for anti-Semitic and misogynist comments.

And at a time when Israel has risked “religious war” with Muslims after trying to install metal detectors and CCTV cameras outside the Al-Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem, recognised as Islam’s third most holy site, the book’s message seems entirely up-to-date.

According to the Independent: “The new security measures were introduced after two Israeli policemen were shot dead by three Arab-Israeli gunmen on July 14. Then 113 people were injured outside the Al-Aqsa mosque on Thursday after Muslims returned to prayers, having initially boycotted services because of the new security measures. The site’s religious authority encouraged worshippers to attend after saying Israel had removed the controversial new security measures.

“Violent clashes broke out as crowds flocked back to afternoon services, and security forces used stun grenades, tear gas and rubber bullets in attempting to control the crowd.”

This was an attempt by the Israeli government to stop innocent people from attending their place of worship – on the flimsy pretext that some of them might be carrying weapons. Would you carry a gun into a church? For what purpose?

Mr Hart’s book shines a light over similar behaviour by Israel. In a review on his own site, Beastrabban states: “Hart is outraged at the bullying and intimidation of decent, non-racist people, by the Zionists, who use false accusations of anti-Semitism to silence their critics.”

There’s an implied accusation against the peaceful worshippers at Al-Aqsa, isn’t there? And doesn’t it appear to be false, if the aggressors were all Israeli security forces?

It is incidents like this that resonate around the world. Remember the 2014 Israel-Gaza conflict, often known as Operation Protective Edge?

That fight led to the deaths of 67 Israeli soldiers, with 468 wounded, while six Israeli civilians were killed and 36 wounded. Compare that with United Nations figures that show 789 Palestinian militants killed, along with 1,462 Palestinian civilians. The Gaza Health Minister suggested that 10,626 militants and civilians were wounded.

These figures are completely disproportionate. While nobody should condone violence carried out by anybody, because armed conflict of any kind is a failure, when one side suffers 577 casualties while the other suffers 12,877 – 25 times as many – outrage seems more than justifiable.

And – unfortunately – that outrage seem to find its expression, not in Israel where it could be used to fuel efforts to find a peaceful end to such conflicts, but in Europe and America, where most Jews live as spiritual Zionists, looking on Jerusalem as the centre of their religion and spiritual capital, but with no further ambition towards that part of the world.

That is the thesis of Mr Hart’s book – “that the behavior of political Zionism’s child, Israel, where only a minority of the world’s Jews live giving substance to Jewish nationalism in action, is the prime cause of the re-awakening of the sleeping giant of anti-Semitism” [from the book’s dust-jacket].

The author was heartened by the result of a debate on the subject “Zionism is today the real enemy of the Jews”, when the motion was carried. For him, it meant “the silence of mainstream diaspora Jews on the matter of the Zionist state’s behavior had been broken”.

But, after reaching out to Jewish groups and organisations, he had to admit that he was facing a long struggle, as he “learned that most Jews, because of the past, are so fearful of the future – unspeakably terrified – not just frightened – that they are frozen in silence, unable more than unwilling to criticize Israel”.

The Beast adds: “This passage therefore shows just how immensely courageous Jewish critics of Zionism… are, in defying this fear. And it also shows just as clearly how utterly wretched and despicable [are] those would try to silence Israel’s critics by denouncing them as anti-Semites, when they are nothing of the sort, and constantly trying to invoke fears of a renewed holocaust. These are the tactics used by the Campaign Against Anti-Semitism and the Jewish Labour Movement.”

I should not have to remind anybody reading this of the names of people who have been denounced as anti-Semites for criticising the behaviour of the Israeli state – or of the fact that I was denounced as one, simply for trying to uncover the facts behind the defamation of some of those people.

A definition of anti-Semitism that includes criticism of Israel among its criteria has been approved by the UK government for no very good reason. What other definition of racism refers to a specific country in such a manner?

So we can see that good people are being terrorised by the threat of being labelled as anti-Semites (or “self-hating Jews”, which is another term directed at Jews who criticise the Israeli political regime).

And organisations like the Campaign Against Antisemitism legitimise their behaviour by joining those who accuse genuine anti-Semites like Kevin Myers.

His abhorrent behaviour has nothing to do with criticism of Israel and everything to do with historic stereotypes that have no place in society – any society. But the CAA can use him to justify its campaign to silence critics of Israel.

That is why most of the fight against anti-Semitism in the modern world is a struggle against those who would abuse the term, applying it to those who don’t deserve it, in order to silence a vast majority of others.

You all know that This Writer is taking part in that struggle. I have been trying to get my local police force to investigate the false statements that were made against me when I was standing as a candidate in the county council elections last May.

The police have been sluggish, to say the least. I had to lodge an official complaint against a wrong decision not to investigate the crime. I was told a week ago that a decision had been made by the force’s legal department but have not been contacted by the Professional Standards Department, which handles complaints, with the details of that decision.

If it comes down against me, I have further legal arguments to put forward. will have justice.

And I know it will take time. It seems I am trying to change an entire culture that is standing against me, solely to perpetuate a lie.

It would be easy to give up, but I won’t.

If I don’t go through with this, how can I expect anybody else to?

Here are four ways to be sure you’re among the first to know what’s going on.

1) Register with us by clicking on ‘Subscribe’ (in the left margin). You can then receive notifications of every new article that is posted here.

2) Follow VP on Twitter @VoxPolitical

3) Like the Facebook page at

Join the Vox Political Facebook page.

4) You could even make Vox Political your homepage at

And do share with your family and friends – so they don’t miss out!

If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!

Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:

Donate Button with Credit Cards

Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.

The Livingstone Presumption is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:


2 thoughts on “The battle against anti-Semitism is wrapped up with aggressive Zionism, not bigots like Kevin Myers

  1. dsbacon2017

    “This was an attempt by the Israeli government to stop innocent people from attending their place of worship – on the flimsy pretext that some of them might be carrying weapons. Would you carry a gun into a church? For what purpose?”

    People might have a multiplicity of purposes for taking a gun into a church from having a weapon blessed by a priest or to actually use it to murder people there. Inter-religious violence might be tolerated by a state opting to look in the other direction as it has in Egypt and Pakistan where Christian churches have been attacked, machine gunned, burned down and the congregations murdered by muslim extremists. Whilst governments have condemned such terror, it seems that they aren’t moved to do too much about it, possibly because they are frightened of annoying the extremists in their countries and having to face their vengeance, too.

    In the US, pro-life activists have targeted and murdered medics working in abortion clinics. So m¨ch for those motivated by the message of their religions as they see them. I can’t see what well-meaning governments can really do except to wait for
    the roots and attractions of terrorism evolve to something more rational.

    Religion and politics are often a cat’s cradle of entanglement. The main difficulty, I think, is that from governments to the ordinary person interested in politics, we all like it most when everybody agrees with us. And, with religion, what can be more pleasing to a missionary to rack up a few conversions from other faiths to his/her own? And this is all tied up with individuals to use power responsibly.

    1. Mike Sivier Post author

      HAving a weapon blessed by a priest?
      That would be a very strange thing for a priest to do, and I wonder where you have seen such a thing.
      As for the possibility of committing crimes of violence in the place of worship, do you honestly think a Muslim in Jerusalem is going to attack other Muslims in Jerusalem? That would seem, to me, a very perverse notion.

Comments are closed.